I was much too skeptical of the science and too trusting of the critics for too long. I changed, too, once I understood the science better.
Why haven't you?
Back then, your position seemed to be:
1) We're adding too little CO2 for it to matter.
2) Sure, AGW is real, but: the models are crap, and scientists are corrupt, and warming in the Arctic is good anyway, and AlGoreisFatandWantsAllMyMoney, so I will fight tooth and nail to prevent an effective government response.
3) Volcanoes!!111
Is that still a good summary of your views? :-) If not, tell me please.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Scott.
Why haven't you?
Back then, your position seemed to be:
1) We're adding too little CO2 for it to matter.
2) Sure, AGW is real, but: the models are crap, and scientists are corrupt, and warming in the Arctic is good anyway, and AlGoreisFatandWantsAllMyMoney, so I will fight tooth and nail to prevent an effective government response.
3) Volcanoes!!111
Is that still a good summary of your views? :-) If not, tell me please.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Scott.