Re: 1. no 2.it is slowing the cooling 3. unknown still warmer in the 1930's

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #393,548 by pwhysall 8/22/14 3:36:10 AM Reply	Re: 1. no 2.it is slowing the cooling 3. unknown still warmer in the 1930's http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_warming_denialism
Post #393,554 by boxley 8/22/14 11:07:36 AM Reply	nice, explained here http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Red_herring Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 59 years. meep
Post #393,555 by pwhysall 8/22/14 11:13:14 AM Reply	Incorrect, the answer to all 3 questions is "yes" Now if you can prove otherwise using non-wingnut data and methods, do so, and win yourself a Nobel.
Post #393,561 by boxley 8/22/14 2:31:41 PM Reply	http://forum.iwethey.org/forum/post/274586/ Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 59 years. meep
Post #393,562 by malraux 8/22/14 2:38:07 PM Reply	Peter is open minded, film at 11. ;-) Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #393,564 by Another Scott 8/22/14 2:41:35 PM Reply	Lots of us have modified our thinking on AGW over the years. I was much too skeptical of the science and too trusting of the critics for too long. I changed, too, once I understood the science better. Why haven't you? Back then, your position seemed to be: 1) We're adding too little CO2 for it to matter. 2) Sure, AGW is real, but: the models are crap, and scientists are corrupt, and warming in the Arctic is good anyway, and AlGoreisFatandWantsAllMyMoney, so I will fight tooth and nail to prevent an effective government response. 3) Volcanoes!!111 Is that still a good summary of your views? :-) If not, tell me please. Thanks. Cheers, Scott.
Post #393,565 by boxley 8/22/14 3:16:10 PM Reply	of course I have modified my postion as well greenhouse gas forcing by humans is a bad thing transferring the wealth of the west to the third world will not stop AGW taxing the west into poverty will not stop AGW the scientists are just starting to recognize that AGW alone will not predict a reliable climate model, they realize they don't know enough. The advice I gave a few years ago about stockpiling water in california is here 6 years ahead of time for example. volcanoes may be a good solution Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 59 years. meep

One for Box: Atlantic causes global warming "haitus". - (Another Scott) - (23) - Aug. 21, 2014, 02:34:52 PM EDT

at least they are now acknowledging that there is more than - (boxley) - (22) - Aug. 21, 2014, 03:40:35 PM EDT

You do realize this *supports* AGW rather than refutes it, right? -NT - (drook) - (21) - Aug. 21, 2014, 03:51:03 PM EDT

You do realize this a complex climate where AGW is not the sole driver right? -NT - (boxley) - (20) - Aug. 21, 2014, 03:57:50 PM EDT

Careful of terminology - (Another Scott) - (19) - Aug. 21, 2014, 04:16:02 PM EDT

Okay, more carefully ... - (drook) - (14) - Aug. 21, 2014, 04:51:55 PM EDT

1. no 2.it is slowing the cooling 3. unknown still warmer in the 1930's -NT - (boxley) - (13) - Aug. 21, 2014, 09:25:33 PM EDT

The 1930s were hotter *in the US* - (malraux) - (5) - Aug. 21, 2014, 11:22:47 PM EDT

got a link to go with that? -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Aug. 21, 2014, 11:50:27 PM EDT

Actually I was wrong. - (malraux) - (3) - Aug. 22, 2014, 08:51:55 AM EDT

is that from the real temps or the normalized ones? -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 22, 2014, 11:03:46 AM EDT

Re: is that from the real temps or the normalized ones? - (malraux) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2014, 11:30:08 AM EDT

thanks, -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 22, 2014, 01:09:06 PM EDT

Re: 1. no 2.it is slowing the cooling 3. unknown still warmer in the 1930's - (pwhysall) - (6) - Aug. 22, 2014, 03:36:10 AM EDT

nice, explained here - (boxley) - (5) - Aug. 22, 2014, 11:07:36 AM EDT

Incorrect, the answer to all 3 questions is "yes" - (pwhysall) - (4) - Aug. 22, 2014, 11:13:14 AM EDT

http://forum.iwethey.org/forum/post/274586/ -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Aug. 22, 2014, 02:31:41 PM EDT

Peter is open minded, film at 11. ;-) -NT - (malraux) - Aug. 22, 2014, 02:38:07 PM EDT

Lots of us have modified our thinking on AGW over the years. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2014, 02:41:35 PM EDT

of course I have modified my postion as well - (boxley) - Aug. 22, 2014, 03:16:10 PM EDT

it was 5 years ago I pointed out that the deep ocean - (boxley) - (3) - Aug. 21, 2014, 11:55:26 PM EDT

Let's see the linky, please. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Aug. 22, 2014, 12:41:59 AM EDT

cant find the dogs ass comment that was in the thread - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2014, 11:01:58 AM EDT

Me neither. Somewhere else? Otherwise, find a different example please. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 22, 2014, 12:14:06 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Ignore the man behind the curtain!
59 ms