If this dry-run on florid amateur forensic fisticuffs is aborted, for a bit:
I await your Review of the mentioned tomes: these shall require of you authentic attention to discursive, oft [actually!-] subtle means of getting across
--the essence of various zeitgeists.. too-many-words?--OK: telling How it Was, so you can feel it.
(Will that do?)
I have supposed.. that you will deem the time invested as Worth-it; I may be wrong. Advance-apology could be an ez-out--but I won't give that.
Fact is, within this doomed anti-culture of rampant diseasedvulture-capitalism: damn few with families and oodles of techno-toys as diversions:
Will read lengthy tomes (other than escape-type stories)==they. no. time. Maybe you, too. Oh well.
Oh, and:
iffen ya means to inject Annie-Randish stuff about Econ and all who sail in that miserable pseudo-nonscience all over the place,
may I direct your attention to my post today in the Money/Mammon forum?
(It seems that holy-Science has finally turned a spotlight onto those who Believe-in Certain-knowledge of what a Debt/GDP Ratio (is that a koan?)
MUST BE and your subtext-messages recently have strongly implied that you are a Card-carrying
Acolyte of all Econ-mumbo-jumbo du jour/du yester-jour.
(I Hope Not, 'cause I'd like to continue to believe that you aren't a self-styled Gnostic on these evanescent/unfathomable intentionalyl-obscurant 'matters'..
of tryin to link Econ-megalo-theories to anything! in Real Life.)
Say It Ain't So, Dan! Hey Man!--it's bogus-think: stuff for anal retentive number freaks, as far from wisdom as a one can <-----> get.
(Of course I have the Proofs: Google Gödel, then Korzybski, Stuart Chase and maybe Geo. Carlin. 'that enough?)
Ta, you smug polysyllabic antidisestablismentarian-outlier/avec coprophagic-grin
er, ;^>
(iI do regret that we had that just-one fone-con wherein the demons could be compared.. eons ago. But now yer Baaack, sorta?)