IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New so how do you know what the government is taking?
So how many also work off the books because they do not have to file a tax status form? Curious.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New It's on my payslip every month.
And I get a P60 form at the end of the year, showing a summary for the year.
New Remember...
Taxes were what founded this country. Or... well the abhorrence of taxes.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
New Damn Tea Party
Messing us up again... Bitter irony?
Just a few thoughts,

Dan
New Bitter Tea... more like.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
New do they break it down at all or is it just a single sum?
What percentage would be interesting as well. How do you handle job expenses that your job doesn't cover? Home internet, gas costs for short trips etc?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New What is this thing you earth people call
"job expenses that your job doesn't cover"?

If I spend money, I claim it back. There's no tax implication. Every mile I drive for work is accounted and claimed for.

If I were being taxed on BIKs, such as fuel, that would be broken out.
Expand Edited by pwhysall Oct. 22, 2013, 12:54:01 PM EDT
New Does 30% on 62K sound about right?
I used this http://www.listentotaxman.com/index.php
and have no idea if that's right. I didn't plug anything into "pension" contribution, nor "allowances/deductions" nor "childcare vouchers". Just clicked "married" and put in 62K pounds (approx $100,000 US) for an example.
New Wouldn't be a million miles out.
Probably a little bit higher. The higher tax rate (40%) kicks in at ~£35K, so:

£0-10K: untaxed
£10-35K: 20%
£35K-whogivesacrap: 40%

New Interesting.
If you're at or near US household median income (51K USD/year), you'd take home *more* if you had your tax code and national health insurance than you would here (assuming you purchase a family health insurance plan through your employer). With the added bonus of not needing to file for bankruptcy if you or a family member gets sick.

I've always suspected that would be the case, but now I know it. Thanks!
     American Healthcare - It is to laugh - (pwhysall) - (61)
         Yeah. They should get off our lawn. -NT - (CRConrad)
         Yeah, we're stupid. - (mmoffitt) - (19)
             TWICE! -NT - (folkert)
             Whatever gets you through the paperwork - (pwhysall) - (17)
                 so how do you know what the government is taking? - (boxley) - (9)
                     It's on my payslip every month. - (pwhysall) - (8)
                         Remember... - (folkert) - (2)
                             Damn Tea Party - (danreck) - (1)
                                 Bitter Tea... more like. -NT - (folkert)
                         do they break it down at all or is it just a single sum? - (boxley) - (4)
                             What is this thing you earth people call - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                 Does 30% on 62K sound about right? - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                     Wouldn't be a million miles out. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                         Interesting. - (mmoffitt)
                 You also forgot to mention your Queen. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                     Nuh-uh. - (pwhysall) - (5)
                         But not greatly simplifying things. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                         We've fought lots of wars. Which one are you referring to? -NT - (drook) - (3)
                             Does it really matter which one? -NT - (folkert) - (1)
                                 (Right answer.) -NT - (Ashton)
                             Or, IOW: Most of them. -NT - (CRConrad)
         You got some splainin' to do Petey - (danreck) - (37)
             "as mind numbingly incomprehensible as ours plus VAT"? - (CRConrad) - (29)
                 Yup. - (Another Scott) - (15)
                     Secretly? Not quite the right word there. -NT - (drook)
                     so you are supporting the fairtax or still demagogueing it? - (boxley) - (13)
                         Heh. - (Another Scott) - (12)
                             support a VAT of 23% but not a sales tax of 23% got it :-) -NT - (boxley) - (11)
                                 The difference between VAT and sales tax. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                     We need to tax unearned income at the same rate as earned. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                         Agreed. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                         Damned Skippy! -NT - (folkert)
                                         agreed, it's all earned -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                             There you Go Again with the snide self-cancelling phrases - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                 Re: There you Go Again with the snide self-cancelling phrase - (boxley) - (1)
                                                     There's Shrub-grade mechanical-stubbornness.. for All t'see. -NT - (Ashton)
                                     oh, you mean like this? - (boxley) - (2)
                                         That's not how it works, do your homework -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                             Why... when you will gladly will... - (folkert)
                 Re: "as mind numbingly incomprehensible as ours plus VAT"? - (danreck) - (12)
                     Nope, you're still not getting it. - (CRConrad) - (11)
                         Quite right. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                         So, in essence, you are Pete by proxy - (danreck) - (9)
                             naw, save that for the good stuff -NT - (boxley)
                             Mine's only ten, but he's precocious. - (CRConrad)
                             Now then, Dan--may I call you 'Dan', Dan? - (Ashton) - (5)
                                 Go right ahead and call him "Milkman Dan". -NT - (CRConrad)
                                 Always going for the Meta aren't you - (danreck) - (3)
                                     No, you just make an arse of yourself. - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                         sure, here crc, have some grapes -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Naah, grapes are far too sweet... - (CRConrad)
                             Re: European - (a6l6e6x)
             Naw, it's dirt simple - (pwhysall) - (6)
                 That's what I tried to explain to him, but he either refused - (CRConrad) - (5)
                     It's just so very very sad... - (jake123) - (4)
                         getting old, not as nimble -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                             Is that your excuse then? - (folkert) - (2)
                                 Gentle, now... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     Yeah yeah... - (folkert)
         But they love filthy socialism - (warmachine) - (1)
             Well, we've got the world's largest per-capita Gun supply.. - (Ashton)

Let's face it: you can't Torquemada anything!
186 ms