IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Hmm.
Dunno about Palin snippets.
Know why?
I'm pretty sure nothing she writes (or has ghost written) is worth the time taken away from, hmm, oh, I dunno.
Anything?
So I won't be going for context there.
No point.

As far as the rest.

History of violence?
But they've done so much for their members.
And society as a whole.

Not that I excuse it, just it's pretty much the same story of the Catholic church, except the church has another level of pedophilia to damn it over.
Yet even I see some of the societal benefits of it.

So, do the holy wars define the church?
The ass raping priests?

Or the whole story?

Note: I'm not a rabid union supporter. They are simply better than the alternative, ie: people treated worse than animals, interchangeable pegs in the most inhumane conditions, yadda yadda yadda.


And no, it's not crap.

By the way, you are usually a bit more reserved (in your mild smirky snarky way) in the subject line. I hit a nerve or something?
New Continued
If a representative of the church came out now talking about "cute boys"...how do you think that would be covered...under a veil of how much good they do for society?

Doubt it very much.

And dismissing Palin's treatment because you don't feel her worthy of your time doesn't change the fact that the press did..and all but accused her of the shooting itself...but in this case they seemed much more worried about dismissing because of context (which, by the way, was exactly the same).

Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
     Where's all the faux outrage now? - (beepster) - (42)
         and what were those comments? - (rcareaga) - (5)
             Hoffa's? - (beepster) - (4)
                 Yup, context does matter - (rcareaga) - (3)
                     You don't know the Teamsters - (beepster) - (2)
                         I was a member once, back in the day. And you? -NT - (rcareaga) - (1)
                             oh never mind - (beepster)
         There isn't any reason for outrage - (jay) - (26)
             Interesting - (beepster) - (25)
                 "You can't cut that any differently." - (rcareaga) - (1)
                     On that... - (beepster)
                 You should know better then that - (jay) - (22)
                     covered in a different post - (beepster) - (21)
                         She only got hammered because of the unfortunate connection - (jay) - (20)
                             Continued rationalization - (beepster) - (19)
                                 Cunningham's speech was a string of insults - (jay) - (18)
                                     So now - (beepster) - (17)
                                         Rush deserves it in full - (jay) - (16)
                                             Ah.. - (beepster) - (15)
                                                 Stop trying to make all offenses equivalent - (jay) - (14)
                                                     Precisely. -NT - (Ashton)
                                                     Fine - (beepster) - (12)
                                                         BinaryBot is Binary. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                                             better be binary than 2 faced. -NT - (beepster) - (10)
                                                                 Re: better be binary than 2 faced. - (hnick) - (9)
                                                                     much easier - (beepster) - (8)
                                                                         No - (crazy) - (1)
                                                                             only sane people inside the beltway and in the press. - (beepster)
                                                                         now beep you know the rule - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                             I know that rule, you know that rule - (beepster) - (4)
                                                                                 So you finally admit that your guys are Republicans - (lincoln) - (3)
                                                                                     my guys are the ones who point fingers and laugh - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                         Yep and the really sad thing is. - (mmoffitt)
                                                                                     Did anyone reference republicans? - (beepster)
         its the teamsters, cement shoes and all -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             baseball bats, bullets, icepicks... - (beepster)
         You're doing a pretty good job in cranking it up. - (Another Scott) - (6)
             yeah, what would his dad say huh -NT - (boxley)
             sure I am - (beepster) - (4)
                 No it's not - (crazy) - (3)
                     That's crap and you know it - (beepster) - (2)
                         Hmm. - (crazy) - (1)
                             Continued - (beepster)

We either do it ourselves, or nobody does.
123 ms