IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New except not having one to deliver.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New True - but you have repeated claimed it wasn't a bomber
and I'll say it again - there is this company called Boeing that sells these cargo thingys to a company called FedEx. We could've shipped on of those aircraft.
New Re: True - but you have repeated claimed it wasn't a bomber
Except it appears they already own the planes being discussed, we just never delivered them.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Yep, we never delivered them
Libya bought eight C-130s in 1969 and liked them well enough to buy eight more for $42 million in 1972. Lockheed built the new aircraft at its Marietta assembly line, test-flew them and painted them in Libyan colors. When they were ready for delivery, however, political considerations kept them grounded.


Libya is still on the U.S. State Department's list of countries that support terrorism, and military sales to such countries are illegal. The United States has lifted travel and trade bans against Libya in the last two months, but State Department officials say Libya is likely to remain on the terrorism list for some time.

The toll that time and neglect have taken on the airframes also is unknown. The planes have stayed outside and exposed to the elements since the Carter administration. Each plane's engines, propellers, avionics and wiring are likely to need overhauls or outright replacement.


www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1129951/posts


Yep, we didn't deliver them. Looks like we had good reasons for not delivering them.

Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Dubya and Obama....and none of these guys (or their administration) have delivered on these planes. Now McCain wants to.
New Actually - we might have delivered them...
The U.S. military dramatically stepped up its assault on Libyan government ground forces over the weekend, launching its first missions with AC-130 flying gunships and A-10 attack aircraft designed to strike enemy ground troops and supply convoys.

The use of the aircraft, during days of heavy fighting in which the momentum seemed to swing in favor of the rebels, demonstrated how allied military forces have been drawn deeper into the chaotic fight in Libya. A mission that initially seemed to revolve around establishing a no-fly zone has become focused on halting advances by government ground forces in and around key coastal cities.

The AC-130s, which fly low and slow over the battlefield and are typically more vulnerable to enemy fire than fast-moving fighter jets, were deployed only after a week of sustained coalition attacks on Libyan government air defenses and radar sites. These aircraft, armed with heavy machine guns and cannons that rake the ground, allow strikes on dug-in Libyan ground forces and convoys in closer proximity to civilians.



http://nation.foxnew...bya#ixzz1WdTitYKP




Abdul - is that our plane?
New See the linkies in 50198. :-)
http://iwt.mikevital....iwt?postid=50198

He has C-130s, and he has more waiting in Marietta that he'll never get.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Sorry...should've included the sign on that one.
We sent over an AC-130 over to Libya...it didn't land, but did leave some presents.
New Whoops! :-)
     Leaked cable: John McCain pushed to arm Qadhafi - (lincoln) - (39)
         Call bs - (beepster) - (38)
             A C130 - (S1mon_Jester) - (22)
                 continued BS - (beepster) - (21)
                     The M form of the plane - (folkert)
                     Used by military organizations. - (Another Scott) - (16)
                         Its not armaments - (beepster) - (12)
                             Hmmm.... - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                 forget it - (beepster) - (6)
                                     Why are you trying to defend him? -NT - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                         Not the point - (beepster) - (4)
                                             Then don't read Politico. Works for me. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                 Well.. - (beepster) - (2)
                                                     I was arguing with you. Doesn't mean I like Politico. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                         Ayup. That much I gathered. -NT - (beepster)
                             So then.. - (Ashton) - (3)
                                 I think what Beep is saying... - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                     I suppose.. - (beepster) - (1)
                                         That'd be dual use. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                         So I guess Alaska Airlines is an airforce? - (boxley) - (2)
                             Why would Qadaffi want them? - (Another Scott)
                             Actually those were L-100 - (S1mon_Jester)
                     I think you're thinking of the AC-130 - (S1mon_Jester) - (2)
                         Spooky. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                             No, the C-130 is fitted with . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             Re: Call bs - (pwhysall) - (14)
                 It's used for many things. - (beepster) - (11)
                     Re: It's used for many things. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         I wouldn't. - (beepster)
                     Nothing I've seen prevents a C-130 - (S1mon_Jester) - (8)
                         except not having one to deliver. -NT - (beepster) - (7)
                             True - but you have repeated claimed it wasn't a bomber - (S1mon_Jester) - (6)
                                 Re: True - but you have repeated claimed it wasn't a bomber - (beepster) - (5)
                                     Yep, we never delivered them - (S1mon_Jester)
                                     Actually - we might have delivered them... - (S1mon_Jester) - (3)
                                         See the linkies in 50198. :-) - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Sorry...should've included the sign on that one. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                                                 Whoops! :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                 they are used to move food and freight to rural alaska - (boxley) - (1)
                     Why would Qadaffi need a STOL plane? - (Another Scott)

You sly ol' iconoclast, you...
146 ms