IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New NRFI fell off a cliff due to worries about taxes. Ok.....
[edit]

Oh, I guess that explains why PNFIA fell when W was elected, too. Worries about taxes being raised. Yeah. http://research.stlo...ies/PNFIA?cid=112

For someone who likes to point out apparent dogmatism here, you seem to have a mighty big beam in your own eye, you know? I didn't say that lack of customers is the only reason why nonresidential investment fell and remains low. But I think it's apparent that it's a better explanation than crocodile tears about taxes. Do you have some evidence to offer for your view that it isn't? Or are you just burning down strawmen again?

Thanks. ;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
Collapse Edited by Another Scott Oct. 7, 2010, 02:45:53 PM EDT
NRFI fell off a cliff due to worries about taxes. Ok.....
     zimbabwe here we come - (boxley) - (76)
         Maybe our resident dismal scientists can explain - (drook) - (74)
             I'm not one but I occasionally play one on IWT. - (Another Scott) - (71)
                 On business.. - (beepster) - (70)
                     NRFI fell off a cliff due to worries about taxes. Ok..... - (Another Scott)
                     No one gets a sure thing - (drook) - (68)
                         Hmm - (beepster) - (67)
                             Republicans criticize Obama. Film at 11:00. - (Another Scott) - (62)
                                 Hmm - (beepster) - (61)
                                     IOW, you can't do it. <Snoopy Dance> :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (60)
                                         Well... - (beepster) - (59)
                                             Um, something in particular in that 20 page screed? - (Another Scott) - (58)
                                                 why is gold so high? insecurity of investors - (boxley) - (2)
                                                     That's a different topic. - (Another Scott)
                                                     Those who are flogging gold . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                                 How do you translate - (beepster) - (54)
                                                     Now you're saying something different - (drook) - (48)
                                                         you obviously didn't read the links - (beepster) - (47)
                                                             Scott already asked you to show your work - (drook) - (46)
                                                                 Well done - (crazy) - (1)
                                                                     Glad you think so... -NT - (beepster)
                                                                 In all of this... - (beepster) - (43)
                                                                     Or you could read the first post in this thread - (drook) - (42)
                                                                         Re: Or you could read the first post in this thread - (beepster) - (41)
                                                                             Why do you make people work so hard to figure out your point - (drook) - (40)
                                                                                 Not certain what is clouding your mind - (beepster) - (6)
                                                                                     Wherein I replace you with a simple script - (drook)
                                                                                     Aaaaaand ... let's try a different tack - (drook) - (4)
                                                                                         you had 3/4 of the repo party chanting voodoo economics - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                                             So to be clear ... - (drook) - (1)
                                                                                                 wrong the economy was in the toilet - (boxley)
                                                                                         Riight. - (beepster)
                                                                                 It's hopeless. - (Another Scott) - (32)
                                                                                     Whatever dude. - (beepster) - (31)
                                                                                         For the customers - (drook) - (1)
                                                                                             Wherever they may be - (beepster)
                                                                                         One more thing to consider. - (Another Scott) - (28)
                                                                                             Meaning... - (beepster) - (27)
                                                                                                 Nope. - (Another Scott) - (26)
                                                                                                     Go figure, we disagree here also. - (beepster) - (25)
                                                                                                         What a surprise. - (Another Scott) - (24)
                                                                                                             Heh.. My Gramma quoted similarly - (Ashton)
                                                                                                             Also not a surprise - (beepster) - (22)
                                                                                                                 Green Peace is right - (boxley)
                                                                                                                 What's not a surprise is you trust teabagger sites. - (Another Scott) - (20)
                                                                                                                     what crap - (boxley)
                                                                                                                     Ah, George Mason University is now a teabagger site. - (beepster) - (18)
                                                                                                                         RCP? - (Another Scott) - (17)
                                                                                                                             Hmm - (beepster) - (16)
                                                                                                                                 Ha! - (Another Scott) - (15)
                                                                                                                                     You ever going to read an entire post? -NT - (beepster) - (14)
                                                                                                                                         Move to strike as unresponsive. - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                                                                                                                             a blog from someone who lives off of BOA bonuses, sure -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                                                 Heh. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                                                                                             Slump in commercial real estate post bubble. News @ 11! - (beepster) - (5)
                                                                                                                                                 Here ya go. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                                                                                                                     What are you babbling about now? - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                                                                                                         Reread #37242 - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                                                                                             you are claiming it is lack of demand - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                                                                 Not me, businesses. Show me I'm wrong. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                                                                                         One more thing - NFIB - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                                                                                                             Hardly - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                                                                                                 I keep finding guys on the K bros payroll - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                                                                                                     More words, please. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                                                                                         sorry - (beepster)
                                                     You're trying to change the topic. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                         That's it! - (drook) - (1)
                                                             Re: That's it! - (beepster)
                                                         then read the links I posted. -NT - (beepster)
                                                         nor is it a semantic game - (beepster)
                             'Human Events', eh? - (Ashton) - (3)
                                 Ah, I see - (beepster) - (2)
                                     Sorry. But.. - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         latin rules are quite clear, econ isnt - (boxley)
             Re: Maybe our resident dismal scientists can explain - (lincoln) - (1)
                 yes it does -NT - (boxley)
         Heh. - (Another Scott)

Specifically, why is he still allowed to make them?
147 ms