IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: You misunderstand, I think
What is liberal or moderate about believing in the existence of an omnipotent being which transcends all known laws of physics?

Arrogant, my arse. It's the only sane viewpoint to take.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
New is there life on other planets?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Of course.
As evidence, see Marlowe.
-----------------------------------------
Worst President ever.
New Re: You misunderstand, I think
Well doesn't physics transcend the laws of physics or was Godel wrong

A

PS the Dawkins interview at Salon exposes him thouroughly through his own words
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New from string theory to the flying spaghetti monster
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
     NOW: Sci. Fri. - Richard Dawkins, book: 'The God Delusion' - (Ashton) - (45)
         Some extracts on the BBC site - (scoenye) - (39)
             Amen to that! - (a6l6e6x) - (21)
                 Phooey - (andread) - (20)
                     Aw, did ver nasty nasty scientist touch a nerve? - (pwhysall) - (18)
                         Re: Aw, did ver nasty nasty scientist touch a nerve? - (andread) - (17)
                             So what's your point? -NT - (pwhysall) - (16)
                                 Re: So what's your point? - (andread) - (15)
                                     Re: So what's your point? - (pwhysall) - (14)
                                         Re: So what's your point? - (andread) - (13)
                                             Re: So what's your point? - (pwhysall) - (12)
                                                 Oh, really? - (andread) - (11)
                                                     You misunderstand, I think - (rcareaga) - (10)
                                                         {sigh} - (Ashton)
                                                         Re: You misunderstand, I think - (andread) - (8)
                                                             Salon interview - (Silverlock) - (2)
                                                                 Fundamentalists of all stripes brook no argument - (imric) - (1)
                                                                     Re: Fundamentalists of all stripes brook no argument - (Ashton)
                                                             Re: You misunderstand, I think - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                 is there life on other planets? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                     Of course. - (Silverlock)
                                                                 Re: You misunderstand, I think - (andread) - (1)
                                                                     from string theory to the flying spaghetti monster -NT - (boxley)
                     Different strokes for different folks. - (a6l6e6x)
             a tad strident dont you think? bizzaro foulwell -NT - (boxley) - (16)
                 Not at all - (scoenye) - (15)
                     What makes you think we care about ID? - (boxley) - (14)
                         uhm, ID in this context is acronym for 'Intelligent Design' -NT - (Steve Lowe)
                         Intelligent Design, Bill. - (pwhysall) - (12)
                             whoops, /switch_rant ID is not an American Export - (boxley) - (11)
                                 You believe some silly shit, you really do. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                 Unfortunately, it is - (scoenye) - (9)
                                     The price of freedom is eternal vigilance - T. Jefferson. - (Another Scott)
                                     hey, post the other stuff. I can read most euro/latin - (boxley) - (2)
                                         Here are some - (scoenye) - (1)
                                             evolution is a theory, well founded in research - (boxley)
                                     Be careful, they're changing the name again - (drewk) - (4)
                                         It was a US District Court ruling that you're thinking of? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                             Might have been that one - (drewk)
                                             Let's boil that down to the root words: - (imqwerky) - (1)
                                                 And you're not even talking about lawyers, either! -NT - (jb4)
         Dawkins was on Colbert Report 10/18/2006. - (Another Scott) - (4)
             Very good - (crazy)
             He's touring US - was on another brief NPR interview today. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 His on the road blog is pretty interesting. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     'Liberty' U review: priceless! - (Ashton)

We look. Often we do not see. Only rarely do we see fully.
102 ms