IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New whoops, /switch_rant ID is not an American Export
go over to your nearest muslim and tell him his Uncle was a monkey, Take a zippered bag to haul your head back home. ID is a methodology claiming a being created life. As opposed to chemical soup brewing, one is as likely as another.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New You believe some silly shit, you really do.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
New Unfortunately, it is
A short while ago, the Dutch minister of education tried to introduce ID into the school programs. She was shot down rather quickly, but the propaganda keeps spreading.

(Sorry, couldn't find an english speaking article for now.)
New The price of freedom is eternal vigilance - T. Jefferson.
ID is rather like communism, or [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudzu|kudzu] - once it gets a strong foothold, it's very hard to uproot. Keep up the fight.

I find it disturbing that the [link|http://www.eternalvigilancesociety.org/|Eternal Vigilance Society] seems to have little understanding of Jefferson. But it's not surprising.

Cheers,
Scott.
New hey, post the other stuff. I can read most euro/latin
based languages.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Here are some
Text of the speech itself:
[link|http://www.minocw.nl/toespraak/73|http://www.minocw.nl/toespraak/73]
In it she calls for a debate at the scholarly level, but given her political roots and position in the government this was generally interpreted as a prelude to introducing ID in the classroom. A follow-up damage control statement to the press didn't make it much better by failing to dispel this ("changes to the school program are not yet in order")

Dutch mainstream newspaper "De Volkskrant" (critical):
[link|http://www.volkskrant.nl/den_haag/article198440.ece/Minister_wil_debat_over_evolutie_en_schepping|http://www.volkskran...utie_en_schepping]

From the Technical University Delft (critical):
[link|http://www.delta.tudelft.nl/archief/j37/n14/19695|http://www.delta.tud...ief/j37/n14/19695]

And from Katholiek Nieuwsblad (supportive):
[link|http://www.katholieknieuwsblad.nl/actueel22/kn2236b.htm|http://www.katholiek...eel22/kn2236b.htm]
(The Church hierarchy didn't want to touch the subject with a ten foot pole and steered itself well clear of the controversy.)

Most of what I could find follows the same general trend. There isn't much more to it because she didn't get any backup from her own party following the criticism so the thing died quickly.

And then we have "homegrown" comments from [link|http://www.demorgen.be/telex/?news=B348022|Miroslaw Orzechowski], Polands new vice minister of edukayshun, last Saturday... He's one of those pining for the good old days from before the Communists.

(The theory of evolution is "a cowardly opinion of an old, non-believing man" possibly arrived at because "he was a vegetarian and missed an inner spirit".)
New evolution is a theory, well founded in research
fruit fly research is extremely well documented. The creationists idealogues cannot understand that. Some evolutionists cannot understand that religion is compatible with evolution. It does belong in a philosophy class at the college level not taught as troot at the highschool biology class.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Be careful, they're changing the name again
ID has been getting a bad rap. In particular, it's getting shot down by the courts, who have actually ruled -- I believe this was the USSC that said this -- that ID is just dressed-up creationism.

So they've got a new term: critical analysis. They're not suggesting that anyone teach anything in particular, just teach the kids to critically analyze -- IOW question and doubt -- the evolution they've just been taught.

In the absence of any history, and if we didn't know who was pushing this and what their agenda has been for several decades, what they're saying would make sense. We should always want people to "critically analyze" science. That's how science progresses.

But the people pushing this are the same ones who wrote textbooks about creationism then, when that got shot down, did a global search-and-replace to change "crationism" to "intelligent design" (No, I'm not exaggerating) and put them back in schools.

And of course there's the fact that despite saying that all science should be questioned -- err, I mean "critically analyzed" -- they only seem to make an issue of it when it comes to evolution.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New It was a US District Court ruling that you're thinking of?
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=238637|#238637].

Cheers,
Scott.
New Might have been that one
But the specific quote I remember reading was specifically saying that "Intelligent Design" is a transparent renaming of Creationism, with all the same core principles behind them.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Let's boil that down to the root words:
So they've got a new term: critical analysis.


critic and anal

Nuff said.


oops, meant to respond to Drew
Smile,
Amy

[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman|Pics of the Family]
Expand Edited by imqwerky Oct. 14, 2006, 10:19:15 PM EDT
New And you're not even talking about lawyers, either!
jb4
"When the final history is written in Iraq, [link|http://images.ucomics.com/comics/tmate/2006/tmate060926.gif|it'll look just like a comma.]"
George W. Bush, 24 Sep 06
     NOW: Sci. Fri. - Richard Dawkins, book: 'The God Delusion' - (Ashton) - (45)
         Some extracts on the BBC site - (scoenye) - (39)
             Amen to that! - (a6l6e6x) - (21)
                 Phooey - (andread) - (20)
                     Aw, did ver nasty nasty scientist touch a nerve? - (pwhysall) - (18)
                         Re: Aw, did ver nasty nasty scientist touch a nerve? - (andread) - (17)
                             So what's your point? -NT - (pwhysall) - (16)
                                 Re: So what's your point? - (andread) - (15)
                                     Re: So what's your point? - (pwhysall) - (14)
                                         Re: So what's your point? - (andread) - (13)
                                             Re: So what's your point? - (pwhysall) - (12)
                                                 Oh, really? - (andread) - (11)
                                                     You misunderstand, I think - (rcareaga) - (10)
                                                         {sigh} - (Ashton)
                                                         Re: You misunderstand, I think - (andread) - (8)
                                                             Salon interview - (Silverlock) - (2)
                                                                 Fundamentalists of all stripes brook no argument - (imric) - (1)
                                                                     Re: Fundamentalists of all stripes brook no argument - (Ashton)
                                                             Re: You misunderstand, I think - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                 is there life on other planets? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                     Of course. - (Silverlock)
                                                                 Re: You misunderstand, I think - (andread) - (1)
                                                                     from string theory to the flying spaghetti monster -NT - (boxley)
                     Different strokes for different folks. - (a6l6e6x)
             a tad strident dont you think? bizzaro foulwell -NT - (boxley) - (16)
                 Not at all - (scoenye) - (15)
                     What makes you think we care about ID? - (boxley) - (14)
                         uhm, ID in this context is acronym for 'Intelligent Design' -NT - (Steve Lowe)
                         Intelligent Design, Bill. - (pwhysall) - (12)
                             whoops, /switch_rant ID is not an American Export - (boxley) - (11)
                                 You believe some silly shit, you really do. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                 Unfortunately, it is - (scoenye) - (9)
                                     The price of freedom is eternal vigilance - T. Jefferson. - (Another Scott)
                                     hey, post the other stuff. I can read most euro/latin - (boxley) - (2)
                                         Here are some - (scoenye) - (1)
                                             evolution is a theory, well founded in research - (boxley)
                                     Be careful, they're changing the name again - (drewk) - (4)
                                         It was a US District Court ruling that you're thinking of? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                             Might have been that one - (drewk)
                                             Let's boil that down to the root words: - (imqwerky) - (1)
                                                 And you're not even talking about lawyers, either! -NT - (jb4)
         Dawkins was on Colbert Report 10/18/2006. - (Another Scott) - (4)
             Very good - (crazy)
             He's touring US - was on another brief NPR interview today. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 His on the road blog is pretty interesting. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     'Liberty' U review: priceless! - (Ashton)

Denying simple readings of the process.
136 ms