IBM ditching windows - (SpiceWare) - (28) - March 8, 2006, 09:37:22 AM EST
         :-) - (Steve Lowe) - March 8, 2006, 11:24:21 AM EST
         Re: IBM ditching windows - (pwhysall) - March 8, 2006, 12:09:41 PM EST
         More - (Steve Lowe) - (23) - March 8, 2006, 12:24:09 PM EST
             One piece of speculation there sounds on the money - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 8, 2006, 12:33:42 PM EST
                 Servers? - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - March 8, 2006, 12:37:34 PM EST
                     So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday. - (folkert) - March 8, 2006, 03:49:52 PM EST
                 Good point. - (Another Scott) - March 8, 2006, 12:38:27 PM EST
             His Reflections on Apple seem wrong - (SpiceWare) - (18) - March 8, 2006, 01:11:14 PM EST
                 I think they're accurate - (ben_tilly) - (17) - March 8, 2006, 06:04:29 PM EST
                     interesting - thanx -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 8, 2006, 06:15:00 PM EST
                     Not entirely - (tuberculosis) - (15) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:30:40 AM EDT
                         They comply with the license. Big whoop. - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 13, 2006, 06:40:32 PM EST
                             That's a very old post - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:32:02 AM EDT
                                 It is under a year old - (ben_tilly) - (12) - March 13, 2006, 08:17:21 PM EST
                                     Things move fast - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:34:18 AM EDT
                                         Please clarify - (ben_tilly) - (10) - March 14, 2006, 01:25:36 AM EST
                                             The post that you cite - (tuberculosis) - (9) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:55 AM EDT
                                                 Sounds like desperate rationalisation on your part. - (CRConrad) - (8) - March 15, 2006, 02:33:07 AM EST
                                                     No, Apple is plenty flakey in lots of areas - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:36:40 AM EDT
                                                         So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (CRConrad) - (4) - March 15, 2006, 09:53:23 AM EST
                                                             It doesn't have one - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:37:10 AM EDT
                                                             Re: So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 15, 2006, 02:44:23 PM EST
                                                                 That would mean I was at least partly wrong - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 04:21:17 PM EST
                                                                     maybe you should suggest an Apple Is Guilty forum -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 15, 2006, 04:54:30 PM EST
                                                     And your familarity with the events is what, CRC? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 07:48:06 AM EST
                                                         Zero[*]. Did I ever say anything else? - (CRConrad) - March 15, 2006, 09:55:53 AM EST
         Or Not. - (altmann) - (1) - March 14, 2006, 01:46:22 AM EST
             30,000 desktop "pilot program" according to . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 15, 2006, 11:09:03 PM EST