Good point.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #247,223

by Another Scott

3/8/06 12:38:27 PM

Good point.

One of the (many) criticisms of IBM and OS/2 was that IBM didn't principally use it itself or offer it on many of their systems.

"Why won't IBM eat its own dog food?"

It's good to see IBM finally moving off it. I hope it's not just an isolated win for Linux inside the company.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who figures this move by IBM is about 12 years later than it should have been...)

IBM ditching windows - (SpiceWare) - (28) - March 8, 2006, 09:37:22 AM EST

:-) - (Steve Lowe) - March 8, 2006, 11:24:21 AM EST

Re: IBM ditching windows - (pwhysall) - March 8, 2006, 12:09:41 PM EST

More - (Steve Lowe) - (23) - March 8, 2006, 12:24:09 PM EST

One piece of speculation there sounds on the money - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 8, 2006, 12:33:42 PM EST

Servers? - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - March 8, 2006, 12:37:34 PM EST

So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday. - (folkert) - March 8, 2006, 03:49:52 PM EST

Good point. - (Another Scott) - March 8, 2006, 12:38:27 PM EST

His Reflections on Apple seem wrong - (SpiceWare) - (18) - March 8, 2006, 01:11:14 PM EST

I think they're accurate - (ben_tilly) - (17) - March 8, 2006, 06:04:29 PM EST

interesting - thanx -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 8, 2006, 06:15:00 PM EST

Not entirely - (tuberculosis) - (15) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:30:40 AM EDT

They comply with the license. Big whoop. - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 13, 2006, 06:40:32 PM EST

That's a very old post - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:32:02 AM EDT

It is under a year old - (ben_tilly) - (12) - March 13, 2006, 08:17:21 PM EST

Things move fast - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:34:18 AM EDT

Please clarify - (ben_tilly) - (10) - March 14, 2006, 01:25:36 AM EST

The post that you cite - (tuberculosis) - (9) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:55 AM EDT

Sounds like desperate rationalisation on your part. - (CRConrad) - (8) - March 15, 2006, 02:33:07 AM EST

No, Apple is plenty flakey in lots of areas - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:36:40 AM EDT

So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (CRConrad) - (4) - March 15, 2006, 09:53:23 AM EST

It doesn't have one - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:37:10 AM EDT

Re: So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 15, 2006, 02:44:23 PM EST

That would mean I was at least partly wrong - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 04:21:17 PM EST

maybe you should suggest an Apple Is Guilty forum -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 15, 2006, 04:54:30 PM EST

And your familarity with the events is what, CRC? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 07:48:06 AM EST

Zero[*]. Did I ever say anything else? - (CRConrad) - March 15, 2006, 09:55:53 AM EST

Or Not. - (altmann) - (1) - March 14, 2006, 01:46:22 AM EST

30,000 desktop "pilot program" according to . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 15, 2006, 11:09:03 PM EST

iwethey.org

If your role can be replaced by Keanu Reeves miming walking into a non-existent wall, then you probably need to go back to waiting tables at the Ground Round--make that the homeless shelter.
84 ms