Servers?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #247,220

3/8/06 12:37:34 PM

Servers?

IBM still makes thier own servers, AFAIK. I'm guessing, though, that mix of Linux/AIX/Windows is such that the risk of increased licensing cost is acceptable to them in that market.

--
Steve
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu]

Post #247,237

3/8/06 3:49:13 PM

3/8/06 3:49:52 PM

So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday.

Mainly because the "big accounts" already have a VLK/MLP/OLP with Microsoft.

Weee. Watch the fallout as it continues.

Oh yeah, one other thing.

It explains why I believe Microsoft has been behind the SCOG machinations from the start.

--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ i_wethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?

SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.

Edited by folkert March 8, 2006, 03:49:52 PM EST

Expand All History

IBM ditching windows - (SpiceWare) - (28) - March 8, 2006, 09:37:22 AM EST

:-) - (Steve Lowe) - March 8, 2006, 11:24:21 AM EST

Re: IBM ditching windows - (pwhysall) - March 8, 2006, 12:09:41 PM EST

More - (Steve Lowe) - (23) - March 8, 2006, 12:24:09 PM EST

One piece of speculation there sounds on the money - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 8, 2006, 12:33:42 PM EST

Servers? - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - March 8, 2006, 12:37:34 PM EST

So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday. - (folkert) - March 8, 2006, 03:49:52 PM EST

Good point. - (Another Scott) - March 8, 2006, 12:38:27 PM EST

His Reflections on Apple seem wrong - (SpiceWare) - (18) - March 8, 2006, 01:11:14 PM EST

I think they're accurate - (ben_tilly) - (17) - March 8, 2006, 06:04:29 PM EST

interesting - thanx -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 8, 2006, 06:15:00 PM EST

Not entirely - (tuberculosis) - (15) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:30:40 AM EDT

They comply with the license. Big whoop. - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 13, 2006, 06:40:32 PM EST

That's a very old post - (tuberculosis) - (13) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:32:02 AM EDT

It is under a year old - (ben_tilly) - (12) - March 13, 2006, 08:17:21 PM EST

Things move fast - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:34:18 AM EDT

Please clarify - (ben_tilly) - (10) - March 14, 2006, 01:25:36 AM EST

The post that you cite - (tuberculosis) - (9) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:55 AM EDT

Sounds like desperate rationalisation on your part. - (CRConrad) - (8) - March 15, 2006, 02:33:07 AM EST

No, Apple is plenty flakey in lots of areas - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:36:40 AM EDT

So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (CRConrad) - (4) - March 15, 2006, 09:53:23 AM EST

It doesn't have one - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:37:10 AM EDT

Re: So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 15, 2006, 02:44:23 PM EST

That would mean I was at least partly wrong - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 04:21:17 PM EST

maybe you should suggest an Apple Is Guilty forum -NT - (SpiceWare) - March 15, 2006, 04:54:30 PM EST

And your familarity with the events is what, CRC? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 15, 2006, 07:48:06 AM EST

Zero[*]. Did I ever say anything else? - (CRConrad) - March 15, 2006, 09:55:53 AM EST

Or Not. - (altmann) - (1) - March 14, 2006, 01:46:22 AM EST

30,000 desktop "pilot program" according to . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 15, 2006, 11:09:03 PM EST

Go into the light!
115 ms