Immodest dress is an issue for many Christian **sects**...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #246,051

by jb4

2/24/06 12:22:21 PM

Immodest dress is an issue for many Christian **sects**...

Especially of the fundie whack-job variety. Yet I don't know of any Christian (with the possible exception of the sickest of the fundie whack-jobs) who would accept stoning of a woman for failing to veil her face, or for automatically exonerating the husband for any "punishment" he would mete out to a wife who failed to veil her face. Do you?

jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration

Iran perhaps more dangerous than Soviet Union - (tablizer) - (40) - Feb. 23, 2006, 01:07:23 AM EST

Economics - (systems) - (36) - Feb. 23, 2006, 08:42:20 AM EST

Deving into Religion.... - (Simon_Jester) - Feb. 23, 2006, 09:22:52 AM EST

It all makes sense now - (broomberg) - Feb. 23, 2006, 09:32:05 AM EST

Scripts - (admin) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:21:53 AM EST

Piling on...(a little bit, anyway) - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:05:22 PM EST

Immodest dress is an issue for many Christian religions -NT - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:52:32 PM EST

There is only one Christian religion. - (CRConrad) - Feb. 24, 2006, 02:38:14 AM EST

Immodest dress is an issue for many Christian **sects**... - (jb4) - Feb. 24, 2006, 12:22:21 PM EST

Re: Economics - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:48:19 PM EST

Re: Economics - (GBert) - Feb. 23, 2006, 03:48:17 PM EST

Re: Economics -- few more points - (systems) - (26) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:10:01 PM EST

okay...recommend this thread move to religion -NT - (Simon_Jester) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:54:32 PM EST

Re: Economics -- few more points - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 23, 2006, 06:21:05 PM EST

I am reminded... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 23, 2006, 06:31:04 PM EST

I don't doubt your faith, but it's not for me. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 24, 2006, 12:03:45 AM EST

So Islam rejects polytheist religions (e.g. Hinduism) - (jb4) - (21) - Feb. 24, 2006, 12:27:45 PM EST

Nah. The Muslims and Hindus get along swell in Kashmir. - (ChrisR) - Feb. 24, 2006, 02:06:44 PM EST

The 'remedy' is simple: convert or die. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (19) - Feb. 24, 2006, 02:15:55 PM EST

Of course. The hallmark of all enlightened people is... - (jb4) - (12) - Feb. 24, 2006, 04:10:48 PM EST

jb4 - (systems) - (11) - Feb. 25, 2006, 06:58:29 PM EST

Must be an Islamic thing... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2006, 07:07:38 PM EST

Nah, I do it also. -NT - (broomberg) - Feb. 25, 2006, 07:29:58 PM EST

You make it all sound so simple. (new thread) - (broomberg) - Feb. 25, 2006, 07:34:12 PM EST

How do you read Quran 5:10? (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2006, 08:54:02 PM EST

So Muslims that want to destroy Israel are sinners? - (a6l6e6x) - (5) - Feb. 26, 2006, 12:18:43 AM EST

Re: So Muslims that want to destroy Israel are sinners? - (systems) - (4) - Feb. 28, 2006, 03:59:48 AM EST

Nice dodge...gambit rejected - (jb4) - Feb. 28, 2006, 09:55:20 AM EST

Thanks for responding. I well knew it would be difficult... - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2006, 01:36:47 PM EST

That's because Jews don't proselytize. - (broomberg) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2006, 08:26:17 PM EST

And everyone should follow their example! :) - (a6l6e6x) - Feb. 28, 2006, 11:35:52 PM EST

When something "rings hollow" - (jb4) - Feb. 27, 2006, 02:14:29 PM EST

The irony is it's not supposed to be that way. - (admin) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2006, 04:29:29 PM EST

I guess somebody 'lost' that script.... - (jb4) - Feb. 24, 2006, 05:01:51 PM EST

But we were talking polytheists here . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2006, 05:15:26 PM EST

Yep, my bad. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 24, 2006, 05:39:20 PM EST

Define "tolerant" - (broomberg) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2006, 06:58:51 PM EST

By the standards of the day, that was generous -NT - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 24, 2006, 08:38:06 PM EST

Re: Iran perhaps more dangerous than Soviet Union - (rcareaga) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:36:40 AM EST

Machiavelli would be proud -NT - (drewk) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:51:37 AM EST

Iran may be a bigger threat to nuke somebody - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:13:50 PM EST

iwethey.org

CFoC
133 ms