IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New So, let's see if I understand this....
#1. We need these tribunals to try non-citizens for terrorist activities.

#2. We have a captured non-citizen who is charged with terrorist activities.

#3. Therefore he will be tried in an open civilian court.

Yes, I completely understand your position now. Of course we need tribunals (secret) to try these people.




PS: Prisoners taken during war are POW's. Treatment of POW's has been codified already.
New Whose position are you referring to...
...because it wouldn't be mine...even though you are responding to me.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Curious.
So, you're saying that you do not support the tribunals?
New I have nothing against the tribunals...
...its the secret part I have a problem with...and have since the beginning.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
     Indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui for 9/11 attacks. - (Another Scott) - (12)
         Question: since he's not a US citizen, how is it that we are - (Ashton) - (11)
             I think you know the answer. - (Another Scott)
             Oh DEAR.... - (bepatient) - (6)
                 Equally valid deduction from all that no-data: - (Ashton) - (1)
                     Xactly. - (mmoffitt)
                 So, let's see if I understand this.... - (Brandioch) - (3)
                     Whose position are you referring to... - (bepatient) - (2)
                         Curious. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                             I have nothing against the tribunals... - (bepatient)
             Too much work - (Ric Locke)
             please sharpen yer stick before poking - (boxley) - (1)
                 I expect that's the compelling reason too. - (Ashton)

Lather, rinse, repeat.
41 ms