Which will be called a Newton II.
And then they'll get bought by Disney.
Or Sony.
And launch the Apple Phone as well.
Any rumours I forgot to cover? :)
Intel Apples?
- (andread)
- (29)
- May 23, 2005, 05:51:53 PM EDT
doubtful
- (SpiceWare)
- (1)
- May 23, 2005, 06:06:42 PM EDT
I agree
- (folkert)
- May 23, 2005, 10:47:19 PM EDT
Cnet says announcement expected Monday 6/6/2005.
- (Another Scott)
- (20)
- June 4, 2005, 12:08:52 PM EDT
Re: "write Intel software".
- (a6l6e6x)
- (13)
- June 4, 2005, 01:18:06 PM EDT
Good and bad
- (admin)
- June 4, 2005, 01:23:57 PM EDT
Apple aren't a software company, though.
- (pwhysall)
- (6)
- June 4, 2005, 01:34:26 PM EDT
Yeah, we wouldn't want it to become popular or something.
-NT
- (folkert)
- (5)
- June 4, 2005, 10:43:07 PM EDT
Selling desktop OSes for PCs is not a business model...
- (pwhysall)
- (3)
- June 5, 2005, 02:54:42 AM EDT
Then... umm
- (folkert)
- (2)
- June 5, 2005, 08:35:58 AM EDT
Antitrust, I expect.
-NT
- (pwhysall)
- June 5, 2005, 09:53:37 AM EDT
Where else would MS get ideas for new features?
- (tuberculosis)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:05:07 AM EDT
I agree
- (tuberculosis)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:06:22 AM EDT
True, but let me elaborate.
- (Another Scott)
- (4)
- June 4, 2005, 02:00:34 PM EDT
Apple running Intel on their new tablet computer
- (Meerkat)
- June 4, 2005, 10:24:27 PM EDT
Andrew Orlowski on the Osborne Effect.
- (Another Scott)
- June 8, 2005, 01:03:02 PM EDT
The Osborne Effect didn't kill Osborne Computer.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- June 20, 2005, 06:18:03 PM EDT
Reading that reminds me of IMSAI.
- (static)
- June 20, 2005, 09:40:41 PM EDT
NY Times has the story now, with more details.
- (Another Scott)
- (5)
- June 5, 2005, 08:47:50 PM EDT
Why do they write for it now?
- (altmann)
- (4)
- June 5, 2005, 09:47:55 PM EDT
Various reasons.
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- June 5, 2005, 11:00:54 PM EDT
Galaxy not the same thing
- (altmann)
- (2)
- June 5, 2005, 11:47:44 PM EDT
One more thing
- (altmann)
- (1)
- June 6, 2005, 04:27:28 AM EDT
Thanks.
- (Another Scott)
- June 6, 2005, 09:48:15 AM EDT
Intel PowerPC CPUs?
- (altmann)
- (3)
- June 5, 2005, 03:55:23 AM EDT
Entirely more feasible than the alternatives. imho
-NT
- (pwhysall)
- June 5, 2005, 06:42:47 AM EDT
makes more sense than Mac on x86
- (cforde)
- (1)
- June 6, 2005, 12:56:38 AM EDT
There is a good reason.
- (folkert)
- June 6, 2005, 07:01:28 AM EDT
Interesting theory on why Apple is switching
- (bluke)
- June 6, 2005, 05:57:52 AM EDT
It's true. They're switching to x86 (new thread)
- (altmann)
- June 6, 2005, 01:55:43 PM EDT