IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Flame Quarantine Forum / It already has.
Post #198,508
by Andrew Grygus
Picture of Andrew Grygus
3/14/05 11:59:18 AM
Reply
New It already has.
California to the left of the line from the Baja cut to San Francisco Bay is not part of the continent at all. It broke off and it's firmly planted on the Pacific Ocean floor. The only way it's going to slip is north because that's the direction the ocean floor is moving.

So when people say California is "different", that's just natural since we're not even part of the continent. Note that Californians to the right of the falt voted with the Red States (but there aren't a whole lot of them).
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Post #198,536
by mmoffitt
3/14/05 1:09:06 PM
Reply
New Right. To the north.
Not the west. That's what I was talking about. The pop view that the whole state would be swallowed by the Pacific is what I was referring to.
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
God Bless America.
     There is NO redeeming virtue to life in NE Indiana. - (mmoffitt) - (44) - March 10, 2005, 04:44:59 PM EST
         And here I am complaining... - (ben_tilly) - March 10, 2005, 06:03:38 PM EST
         *whine* - (admin) - (38) - March 10, 2005, 06:43:58 PM EST
             *cheese* -NT - (n3jja) - March 11, 2005, 12:13:54 AM EST
             I know. It's snowed EVERY - (mmoffitt) - (36) - March 11, 2005, 08:30:41 AM EST
                 One two safe months... - (lister) - March 11, 2005, 08:59:07 AM EST
                 Yabut - (admin) - (30) - March 11, 2005, 04:15:31 PM EST
                     I'd trade earthquakes for snow/cold any day. - (mmoffitt) - (29) - March 14, 2005, 11:31:29 AM EST
                         Not odd at all - (ben_tilly) - (28) - March 14, 2005, 11:32:57 AM EST
                             I don't think that's it. - (mmoffitt) - (27) - March 14, 2005, 11:37:01 AM EST
                                 It already has. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 14, 2005, 11:59:18 AM EST
                                     Right. To the north. - (mmoffitt) - March 14, 2005, 01:09:06 PM EST
                                 Re: I don't think that's it. - (admin) - (24) - March 14, 2005, 01:37:25 PM EST
                                     There's a 58.4329% probability that that's true. -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - March 14, 2005, 01:42:21 PM EST
                                         It's a mandate! A landslide! Total validation! -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 14, 2005, 01:46:40 PM EST
                                             No, a mandate is 51.2441269406386282368653206 % HTH! :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 14, 2005, 01:56:21 PM EST
                                                 49% if you're using Diebold. -NT - (inthane-chan) - March 14, 2005, 02:35:13 PM EST
                                     88.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot. -NT - (pwhysall) - (19) - March 14, 2005, 02:47:25 PM EST
                                         Where's your supporting data buddy? It's 89.74% -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (18) - March 14, 2005, 03:22:19 PM EST
                                             That's all right. 67.342% of all statistics are wrong. -NT - (imric) - (17) - March 14, 2005, 03:38:57 PM EST
                                                 Huh? Last I heard wrong was hugging 100%. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (16) - March 14, 2005, 04:12:41 PM EST
                                                     See? -NT - (imric) - March 14, 2005, 04:27:51 PM EST
                                                     100.5% are wrong -NT - (Arkadiy) - (14) - March 14, 2005, 04:57:44 PM EST
                                                         Been taking math lessons from Dubya? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (13) - March 14, 2005, 05:06:40 PM EST
                                                             In that case, it would be 200% -NT - (Arkadiy) - (12) - March 14, 2005, 05:27:43 PM EST
                                                                 No,No,No. that'd be 200i% -NT - (folkert) - (11) - March 14, 2005, 06:20:39 PM EST
                                                                     You - (Ashton) - March 15, 2005, 12:32:17 AM EST
                                                                     Did you just insinuate that the current US President - (Arkadiy) - (9) - March 15, 2005, 11:34:03 AM EST
                                                                         So, I guess you got the Joke then. Excellent. - (folkert) - (8) - March 15, 2005, 03:05:54 PM EST
                                                                             So could you say... - (static) - (7) - March 15, 2005, 10:21:06 PM EST
                                                                                 It's not even a parallel reality. It's perpendicular. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (6) - March 16, 2005, 09:18:43 AM EST
                                                                                     "It might be at 90 deg to reality, but in which direction?" -NT - (static) - (5) - March 16, 2005, 11:23:44 PM EST
                                                                                         Counterclockwise - (Arkadiy) - (4) - March 17, 2005, 09:05:01 AM EST
                                                                                             OTOH, "a right turn" is usually seen as = "a clockwise turn" -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 17, 2005, 09:07:42 AM EST
                                                                                                 In which hemisphere, Northern or Southern? -NT - (folkert) - (2) - March 17, 2005, 09:37:39 AM EST
                                                                                                     Clocks and watches turn the same way everywhere, AFAIK. - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 18, 2005, 02:37:54 AM EST
                                                                                                         I see you got the insinuation. -NT - (folkert) - March 18, 2005, 08:51:37 AM EST
                 It was settled because... - (jb4) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 08:02:08 PM EST
                     :-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 24, 2005, 08:10:35 AM EST
                     First edit made it make perfect sense; the second undid it. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 25, 2005, 04:09:08 PM EST
                         It's been a long day yesterday... - (jb4) - March 25, 2005, 06:08:58 PM EST
         Hardest I had it... - (ChrisR) - (1) - March 10, 2005, 06:57:32 PM EST
             Just in the summer? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 10, 2005, 08:24:27 PM EST
         It snowed here again last night - (bionerd) - (1) - March 12, 2005, 11:15:45 AM EST
             Does the melting include sidewalks? - (lister) - March 15, 2005, 12:15:14 PM EST

Boy, isn't that true about damn near any subject?
106 ms