IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why.. you could take a Regiment all the way to N. Korea
New And one SAM would eliminate said regiment.
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
New The Stealth A380 is planned for Version 2.0.
;-j

Cheers,
Scott.
New You!

Sillies...!
New Re: Why.. you could take a Regiment all the way to N. Korea
I'd just like to say that I work on the 380 wings at Aerospace in Broughton, UK. It is an impressive piece of engineering.
New Welcome! Tell us more.
Any composites used? How does it compare (in any way you'd like) to the [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spruce_Goose|H-4 Hercules]?

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Welcome! Tell us more.
As far as I'm aware the A380 is about 25% composites in total. Don't ask me the exact make up, I'm just an electrical grease monkey. The wing itself feels very slick to the touch, more than the 330. A comparison with the Hercules? I don't I can make any meaningful comparison. I've never been inside a Herc. (Come to that, I've never been inside a 380 - yet)
New I assume this is fly-by-wire.
Can you turn it off in this model? Or is it like the A320's and you can't?

(I could look this up, perhaps, but hey, we've got an expert! And add my WELCOME! to the bunch).
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
(Just trying to be accepted in the New America)
New Re: I assume this is fly-by-wire.
Yes, it is. The FBW system is operational 100% of the time with high redundancy. The hydraulics look a little different too.
Apparently, talking to one of my aircraft obsessive workmates, the original A380 FBW system had to be degraded. It was working too well, you could lose power from one of the engines and the cabin crew wouldn't know about it, so they programmed it to add some slippage.
New That's what I'd guessed.
I just got my Private license about 2.5 years ago and have talked about FBW technology that you "can't turn off" quite a bit with other PPSEL's through ATPs. The consensus was that FBW was great, but all of us agreed that it should be implemented on Boeing's model - the PIC can turn it off.

I'm geniunely not trying to tick you off. But I am very curious if there ever has been any debate with Airbus that you're aware of concerning adding the PIC's ability to shut off the FBW?

I guess what scares me and the other pilots I've spoken to is stuff like this:
[link|http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/lh2904/photo.shtml|http://www.airdisast...h2904/photo.shtml]

DLH 2904 flight from Frankfurt to Warsaw progressed normally until Warsaw Okecie TWR warned the crew that windshear exists on approach to RWY 11, as reported by DLH 5764, that had just landed. According to Flight Manual instructions PF used increased approach speed and with this speed touched down on RWY 11 in Okecie aerodrome. Very light touch of the runway surface with the landing gear and lack of compression of the left landing gear leg to the extent understood by the aircraft computer as the actual landing resulted in delayed deployment of spoilers and thrust reversers. Delay was about 9 seconds. Thus the braking commenced with delay and in condition of heavy rain and strong tailwind (storm front passed through aerodrome area at that time) aircraft did not stop on runway.

In effect of the crash one crew member and one of the passengers lost their lives. The aircraft sustained damage caused by fire.


[link|http://sunnyday.mit.edu/accidents/warsaw-report.html|http://sunnyday.mit....arsaw-report.html]

There are more, of course, like the Lufthansa flight in the clouds on final where the first officer thought he keyed in -3.5 degrees and what he actually keyed in was -3,500/min descent. They broke through the clouds at 1,000 agl, both pilot and first officer yanked the stick back but nothing happened because the computer decided that was "too much input" and instead nicely rounded it out into the ground and killed all on board.

bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
(Just trying to be accepted in the New America)
New Re: That's what I'd guessed.
>I'm geniunely not trying to tick you off. But I am very curious if there ever has >been any debate with Airbus that you're aware of concerning adding the PIC's >ability to shut off the FBW?

I really don't know. As I said in a previous post, I'm just a grease monkey. I leave the clever sods to concentrate on design and safety issues, while I concentrate on not falling off a four storey high wing jig. :)
New ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
(Just trying to be accepted in the New America)
New There's only one H-4 Hercules. :-) 3 images.
It's also known as the "Spruce Goose".

[link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spruce_Goose#Specifications|H-4 Hercules]:

[image|http://commons.wikimedia.org/upload/thumb/4/4c/300px-H-4_Hercules_2.jpg|0|Hughes H-4 Hercules|214|300]

General characteristics

* Wingspan: 319 ft 11 in (97.54 m)
* Length: 218 ft 8 in (66.65 m)
* Height: 79 ft 4 in (24.18 m)
* Fuselage height: Approx. 30 ft (9.1 m)
* Engines: 8 \ufffd Pratt & Whitney R-4360 Wasp Major, 3,000 hp (2.2 MW) each
* Propellers: 8 \ufffd four-bladed Hamilton Standard, diameter 17 ft 2 in (5.23 m)

Performance (projected)

* Intended cruising speed: Approx. 200 mph (320 km/h)
* Intended maximum range: Approx. 3,000 miles (4,800 km)
* Intended endurance (cruise): 20.9 h
* Intended service ceiling: 20,900 ft (6,370 m)


[link|http://www.pbs.org/kcet/chasingthesun/planes/a380.html#specifications|A380]:

[image|http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1390000/images/_1393390_300parisairshow3.jpg|0|A380 Mockup in Paris|280|380]

SPECIFICATIONS
Manufacturer \tAirbus
First Flight: \tSeptember 1, 2004
Wingspan: \t261 feet, 10 inches
Length: \t239 feet, 6 inches
Height: \t79 feet, 1 inch
Weight: \t606,000 pounds (empty)
Top Speed: \t652 miles per hour
Cruising Speed: \t630 miles per hour
Flight Altitude: \t43,000 feet
Range: \t8,000 miles
Engines: \t4 engines Rolls-Royce Trent 900 or Engine Alliance
Passenger
Accommodations: \t555 passengers


They're obviously quite different. The H-4 still has the longest wingspan. The [link|http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/transport-m/an225/|An-225] has the largest wingspan of the modern jets (88.4 m = 290 feet):

[image|http://www.globalaircraft.org/photos/planephotos/an-225-1.jpg|0|An-225|324"|480]

It must be fun to work on such a unique project as the A380.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Sweet...
Now we gots the AeroSpace mIndustry here... TOO!

Awesome.

Meets and Greets required!
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

[link|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Miltary Intelligence"]
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
New Re: Sweet...
Thanks for the greet Folkert
New wow! welcome!!
now is there any design functions of the wings different or is it a case of lighter and bigger.
regards,
daemon
that way too many Iraqis conceived of free society as little more than a mosh pit with grenades. ANDISHEH NOURAEE
clearwater highschool marching band [link|http://www.chstornadoband.org/|http://www.chstornadoband.org/]
New Re: wow! welcome!!
Mainly lighter and bigger. The internal structure has changed slightly, but nothing drastic. And as I said before, the wing is smoother, not just to the touch, but when you look at it you can see there are less rivets. Transportation is the biggest change, we fly the A330 wings out to France on a Beluga from the nearby airport. The 380's have to be driven on a monster 100 wheel trailer to the nearest dock, and then loaded onto a specially built barge to cross to the Continent.
New Hail, fellow Brit. (new thread)
Created as new thread #190977 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=190977|Hail, fellow Brit.]


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
     "Airbus A380 doubledecker plane" - (a6l6e6x) - (38)
         And the insurance companies are in a cold sweat. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
             Airports, too. - (static) - (1)
                 Just a few to begin with. - (a6l6e6x)
         Photos linky. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Pictures 2, 3 & 4 mislabled - (drewk)
         Somehow.. the prospect of remembering , with two - (Ashton) - (2)
             I'm sure they have to be able to evacuate it in 90 s too... -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Well, maybe. - (a6l6e6x)
         I wonder what the wake turbulence will be like. - (mmoffitt) - (22)
             FedEx and UPS are customers. - (Another Scott) - (21)
                 Yikes! - (folkert) - (20)
                     Why.. you could take a Regiment all the way to N. Korea -NT - (Ashton) - (17)
                         And one SAM would eliminate said regiment. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (2)
                             The Stealth A380 is planned for Version 2.0. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 You! - (Ashton)
                         Re: Why.. you could take a Regiment all the way to N. Korea - (saganista) - (13)
                             Welcome! Tell us more. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                 Re: Welcome! Tell us more. - (saganista) - (6)
                                     I assume this is fly-by-wire. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                         Re: I assume this is fly-by-wire. - (saganista) - (3)
                                             That's what I'd guessed. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                 Re: That's what I'd guessed. - (saganista) - (1)
                                                     ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                     There's only one H-4 Hercules. :-) 3 images. - (Another Scott)
                             Sweet... - (folkert) - (1)
                                 Re: Sweet... - (saganista)
                             wow! welcome!! - (daemon) - (1)
                                 Re: wow! welcome!! - (saganista)
                             Hail, fellow Brit. (new thread) - (pwhysall)
                     Does anyone see the possibilities here? - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                         Might get ahead of the demand. -NT - (folkert)
         Assembly line show and tell - (scoenye) - (2)
             Neat. Thanks. The twiki might be a good spot. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Up under OpenForum -NT - (scoenye)
         'Ask the Pilot' (Salon) on the 380 - (Ashton) - (3)
             Teehee - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 Maybe the FBW thing is for those French pilots ... - (mmoffitt)
             Oh, yippee, one-point-three whole *inches*! Feh... -NT - (CRConrad)

Sex. Always sex.
99 ms