Tilting at windmills: classes vs objects - (drewk) - (35) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:26:04 PM EST
         Er, no. - (admin) - (14) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:35:32 PM EST
             Well ... - (drewk) - (11) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:41:28 PM EST
                 They're wrong. - (admin) - (9) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:49:05 PM EST
                     I'd say parallel development - (drewk) - (5) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:50:21 PM EST
                         I dispute that claim - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:13:16 PM EST
                             Exactly. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 26, 2005, 08:51:54 AM EST
                         History of PHP in question - (tablizer) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2005, 03:57:57 AM EST
                             PHP started as less then a scripting language - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2005, 08:16:52 PM EST
                                 Them 'er fightin' words - (tablizer) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:10:29 AM EST
                     I think PHP's upgrades are just practical. - (static) - (2) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:15:54 AM EST
                         By "class variables" you mean "static" class variables? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:18:47 AM EST
                             Er, yes. - (static) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:39:01 AM EST
                 What to say if someone says that... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 13, 2005, 10:43:01 AM EST
             Nit - (dshellman) - (1) - Jan. 13, 2005, 10:53:33 AM EST
                 Actually, that's not a nit - (admin) - Jan. 13, 2005, 10:58:38 AM EST
         a class is a type of object - (daemon) - (2) - Jan. 12, 2005, 10:44:44 PM EST
             It's tables all the way down. :-) - (ChrisR) - (1) - Jan. 12, 2005, 11:51:51 PM EST
                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:07:45 AM EST
         Very astute observation - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 13, 2005, 12:10:32 PM EST
         Re: Tilting at windmills: classes vs objects - (systems) - (15) - Jan. 24, 2005, 06:50:48 PM EST
             I suspected that programming would eventually converge - (Ashton) - Jan. 25, 2005, 03:04:32 AM EST
             Do you honestly believe that this is from TCL??? - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Jan. 25, 2005, 09:21:46 AM EST
                 Amen - (broomberg) - Jan. 25, 2005, 08:20:59 PM EST
                 Re: Do you honestly believe that this is from TCL??? - (systems) - (11) - Feb. 2, 2005, 02:55:04 AM EST
                     think you had better be a developer - (daemon) - (3) - Feb. 2, 2005, 09:07:03 AM EST
                         Funny; I was thinking the opposite ;) -NT - (FuManChu) - (2) - Feb. 2, 2005, 12:31:27 PM EST
                             Ive met lots of developers that have no clue - (daemon) - Feb. 2, 2005, 01:25:40 PM EST
                             Neither - (broomberg) - Feb. 2, 2005, 08:29:41 PM EST
                     Let me get this straight - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 2, 2005, 08:48:42 PM EST
                         very loud VD (clap clap clap) -NT - (daemon) - Feb. 2, 2005, 10:11:52 PM EST
                         Then let me elaborate - (systems) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2005, 04:55:39 AM EST
                             "Systems", you should meet Bryce. Bryce, this is "Systems". -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 3, 2005, 05:42:13 AM EST
                             BTW, "Systems": Lay off the exclamation marks. Have some ... - (CRConrad) - Feb. 3, 2005, 05:45:25 AM EST
                             You sound like the Rincewind of programming -NT - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 3, 2005, 11:20:52 AM EST
                     For scripting, TCL is poo. -NT - (pwhysall) - Feb. 3, 2005, 10:13:05 AM EST