IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Unix Forum / I'd use tar.
Post #175,887
by static
Picture of static
9/23/04 10:25:44 AM
Reply
New I'd use tar.
Tar I can make do what I need it to. I don't know cpio.

Incidentally, I've done this over an ad-hoc ssh pipe. Required some thinking to setup but it worked.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.
Post #175,895
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
9/23/04 10:44:56 AM
Reply
New Re: I'd use tar.
I have a bad feeling about tar. Not standard, sometimes doesn't copy 0 length files, etc. cpio is totally standard. But I really don't know which is better. Who else has needed to mv/cp a gigantic tree?
-drl
Post #175,898
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
9/23/04 10:46:57 AM
Reply
New I've done it on Linux.,
cp -pR does the honours, preserves security.

Note that that's GNU cp. Proprietary UNIX upholds the tenet that "if it don't suck ass, it ain't worth paying for", and cheerfully trashes the security.

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
     tar vs. cpio - (deSitter) - (43) - Sept. 23, 2004, 09:34:54 AM EDT
         I'd use tar. - (static) - (2) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:25:44 AM EDT
             Re: I'd use tar. - (deSitter) - (1) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:44:56 AM EDT
                 I've done it on Linux., - (pwhysall) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:46:57 AM EDT
         dd - (pwhysall) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:44:18 AM EDT
         What I'd do. - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:48:01 AM EDT
             Re: What I'd do. - (deSitter) - (1) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:50:13 AM EDT
                 Nope - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 23, 2004, 11:05:45 AM EDT
         What I'd be inclined to do - (ben_tilly) - (35) - Sept. 23, 2004, 11:01:05 AM EDT
             What he said. -NT - (static) - Sept. 23, 2004, 10:09:07 PM EDT
             Re: What I'd be inclined to do - (deSitter) - (33) - Sept. 24, 2004, 04:19:06 AM EDT
                 The CPU overhead is likely less than the network overhead. - (pwhysall) - (30) - Sept. 24, 2004, 07:04:00 AM EDT
                     Especially text... -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 24, 2004, 10:31:45 AM EDT
                         Not a given - (deSitter) - (3) - Sept. 24, 2004, 10:46:03 AM EDT
                             Even PKZip on a 286 running DOS could fly through text files - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 24, 2004, 11:04:49 AM EDT
                                 Re: Even PKZip on a 286 running DOS could fly - (deSitter) - Sept. 24, 2004, 11:08:01 AM EDT
                             Doesn't matter - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 24, 2004, 11:07:23 AM EDT
                     In fact... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 24, 2004, 11:22:34 AM EDT
                         Re: In fact... - (deSitter) - Sept. 24, 2004, 11:47:50 AM EDT
                     Your pipe is too small then - (broomberg) - (22) - Sept. 24, 2004, 05:46:13 PM EDT
                         Try different compression quality? - (ben_tilly) - (18) - Sept. 24, 2004, 06:54:01 PM EDT
                             Try? We do not try. We do. - (broomberg) - (17) - Sept. 25, 2004, 08:13:15 PM EDT
                                 An advantage of gzip is that it's easy to detect errors. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Sept. 25, 2004, 08:25:35 PM EDT
                                     If you MUST... - (broomberg) - Sept. 25, 2004, 08:44:07 PM EDT
                                 Thanks for the figures - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 26, 2004, 01:56:09 AM EDT
                                 Thanks, and questions. - (pwhysall) - Sept. 26, 2004, 02:00:08 AM EDT
                                 lzop vs. gzip - (pwhysall) - (12) - Sept. 26, 2004, 02:34:36 AM EDT
                                     Interesting - (broomberg) - (11) - Sept. 26, 2004, 07:31:51 AM EDT
                                         Seeing you tease Peter makes me aware that... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2004, 11:58:22 AM EDT
                                             In person - (broomberg) - Sept. 27, 2004, 12:41:09 PM EDT
                                         What are happening to the 450s? - (folkert) - (3) - Sept. 27, 2004, 12:28:46 PM EDT
                                             Dunno. Ask Dave. - (broomberg) - (2) - Sept. 27, 2004, 12:39:33 PM EDT
                                                 I'm sorry Dave, but Dave's friend Dave says Dave's at... - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 27, 2004, 01:05:25 PM EDT
                                                 Thanks. -NT - (folkert) - Sept. 28, 2004, 02:19:24 PM EDT
                                         Ah, but in MY house... - (pwhysall) - (4) - Sept. 28, 2004, 03:32:35 AM EDT
                                             Not spam - (broomberg) - (3) - Sept. 28, 2004, 07:33:49 PM EDT
                                                 Still spam; just spam on dead trees. - (CRConrad) - (2) - Sept. 29, 2004, 01:43:02 AM EDT
                                                     "admirable or honourable" - Yup - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2004, 08:19:15 AM EDT
                                                         The fulfillment (sic) third, maybe. The rest? Nope. - (CRConrad) - Sept. 29, 2004, 01:54:13 PM EDT
                         That was my intuitive suspicion -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - Sept. 25, 2004, 06:22:42 PM EDT
                             And as usual - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 25, 2004, 08:15:23 PM EDT
                                 Well sure - (deSitter) - Sept. 26, 2004, 12:52:31 PM EDT
                 Beware spaces in filenames - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Sept. 24, 2004, 01:37:14 PM EDT
                     Already checked :) -NT - (deSitter) - Sept. 24, 2004, 03:11:47 PM EDT

Yeah, God forbid it should be your Mom.
114 ms