IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Software and Applications Forum / Two things.
Post #171,142
by static
Picture of static
8/26/04 9:37:51 PM
Reply
New Two things.
Does the 6.3 vim global file turn on syntax highlighting or not? If 6.2 does, or you added that, and 6.3 doesn't it would look like it's forgotten you have a colour terminal.

The other thing is that the rules might have changed slightly for telling the syntax highlighting that you can do colour based on your TERM setting. I remember having that problem within screen somewhere when my TERM when slightly funny after an SSH.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.
Post #171,365
by drewk
Picture of drewk
8/27/04 5:11:48 PM
Reply
New Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color terminal? - (drewk) - (15) - Aug. 26, 2004, 01:05:09 PM EDT
         Yes. - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 26, 2004, 02:42:51 PM EDT
             Not gvim ... vim - (drewk) - Aug. 26, 2004, 03:27:30 PM EDT
         Two things. - (static) - (1) - Aug. 26, 2004, 09:37:51 PM EDT
             Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc -NT - (drewk) - Aug. 27, 2004, 05:11:48 PM EDT
         ln -sf /usr/bin/emacs /usr/bin/vim - (pwhysall) - Aug. 27, 2004, 12:29:05 PM EDT
         Re: Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color termi - (n01) - (1) - Sept. 22, 2004, 05:26:44 AM EDT
             Cool, that seems to be *half* the problem - (drewk) - Sept. 22, 2004, 09:00:01 AM EDT
         :syntax on OSLT, put in .vimrc -NT - (deSitter) - (7) - Sept. 22, 2004, 08:56:45 AM EDT
             It's there, syntax *is* being hilighted - (drewk) - (6) - Sept. 22, 2004, 09:02:04 AM EDT
                 Then check $TERM - (deSitter) - (5) - Sept. 22, 2004, 12:07:50 PM EDT
                     $TERM is Eterm - (drewk) - (4) - Sept. 22, 2004, 01:22:29 PM EDT
                         Are you using E-Term? - (folkert) - (3) - Sept. 22, 2004, 02:34:51 PM EDT
                             Yes, E-Term - (drewk) - (2) - Sept. 22, 2004, 02:45:58 PM EDT
                                 I believe that... - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 22, 2004, 03:27:02 PM EDT
                                     Tried it - (drewk) - Sept. 22, 2004, 03:58:43 PM EDT

5000 years from now, they'll all be mystified and have their tourist pics snapped in front of it.
59 ms