IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yes.
Remember that thing about implicitly condoning stupidity?













































































but first we gotta know what gvim you have:
Package gvim is a virtual package provided by:\n  vim-tcl 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-ruby 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-python 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-perl 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-lesstif 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-gtk 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-gnome 1:6.3-015+1


Uh, which one.

But anyway, the process is the same:

mkdir foo ; cd foo
dpkg-deb -x /where/the/packge/is/virt-gvim-someversion.i386.deb .


That will extract the package with foo/ as the "rootdir"

get the file(s) you want out of there. BTW gvim is prolly vim with the "named version" added to it.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Not gvim ... vim
dkime-linux:~$ dpkg -l | grep vim
ii vim 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii vim-common 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - Common files
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color terminal? - (drewk) - (15)
         Yes. - (folkert) - (1)
             Not gvim ... vim - (drewk)
         Two things. - (static) - (1)
             Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc -NT - (drewk)
         ln -sf /usr/bin/emacs /usr/bin/vim - (pwhysall)
         Re: Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color termi - (n01) - (1)
             Cool, that seems to be *half* the problem - (drewk)
         :syntax on OSLT, put in .vimrc -NT - (deSitter) - (7)
             It's there, syntax *is* being hilighted - (drewk) - (6)
                 Then check $TERM - (deSitter) - (5)
                     $TERM is Eterm - (drewk) - (4)
                         Are you using E-Term? - (folkert) - (3)
                             Yes, E-Term - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I believe that... - (folkert) - (1)
                                     Tried it - (drewk)

Powered by a Commodore 64!
70 ms