IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color terminal?
A recent apt-get upgrade took me from vim 6.2 to vim 6.3. Now it doesn't use color any more. I seem to remember having this problem before and fixing it, so it could be that I lost a modified config file somewhere. What should I be looking for?

While working on this I realized I shouldn't have done something I did a while back. I knew there were configs I always wanted in vim, so I modified the global vimrc instead of installing a personal .vimrc. Now every time there's an update apt asks me if I want to keep my locally-modified vimrc or take the maintainer's version. Is there a way to pull just the vimrc file from the package and install that?
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Yes.
Remember that thing about implicitly condoning stupidity?













































































but first we gotta know what gvim you have:
Package gvim is a virtual package provided by:\n  vim-tcl 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-ruby 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-python 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-perl 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-lesstif 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-gtk 1:6.3-015+1\n  vim-gnome 1:6.3-015+1


Uh, which one.

But anyway, the process is the same:

mkdir foo ; cd foo
dpkg-deb -x /where/the/packge/is/virt-gvim-someversion.i386.deb .


That will extract the package with foo/ as the "rootdir"

get the file(s) you want out of there. BTW gvim is prolly vim with the "named version" added to it.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Not gvim ... vim
dkime-linux:~$ dpkg -l | grep vim
ii vim 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii vim-common 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - Common files
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Two things.
Does the 6.3 vim global file turn on syntax highlighting or not? If 6.2 does, or you added that, and 6.3 doesn't it would look like it's forgotten you have a colour terminal.

The other thing is that the rules might have changed slightly for telling the syntax highlighting that you can do colour based on your TERM setting. I remember having that problem within screen somewhere when my TERM when slightly funny after an SSH.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New ln -sf /usr/bin/emacs /usr/bin/vim
Problem solved :-)

Otherwise, it's over to Greg at the sports desk.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Re: Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color termi
in /etc/vim/vimrc, search the path, and change vim62 to vim63.
nnn
New Cool, that seems to be *half* the problem
It's no longer complaining that it can't find the colorscheme. But it's still monochrome. :-/
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New :syntax on OSLT, put in .vimrc
-drl
New It's there, syntax *is* being hilighted
It's just being hilighted as bold or reverse. No colors.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Then check $TERM
Sounds like vt100 disease.
-drl
New $TERM is Eterm
I vaguely remember having to deal with this when I switched to eterm. Now to dig through configs and see where it identifies that ...
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Are you using E-Term?
Or are you using Gnome Terminal?
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Yes, E-Term
And I have been for a while. Colors worked with vim6.2, stopped when I got vim6.3.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Expand Edited by drewk Sept. 22, 2004, 02:45:58 PM EDT
New I believe that...
E-Term used to use another $TERM spec until recently.

This might have been the whole cause inconjunction with the 6.2->6.3 issue.

Force E-Term to use an xterm definition.

TERM=xterm

to check to see if that *IS* the issue :

export TERM=xterm

If that fixes it, you now know where you problem exists.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Tried it
Tried TERM-xterm, xterm-color, linux, etc etc etc. No joy.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color terminal? - (drewk) - (15)
         Yes. - (folkert) - (1)
             Not gvim ... vim - (drewk)
         Two things. - (static) - (1)
             Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc -NT - (drewk)
         ln -sf /usr/bin/emacs /usr/bin/vim - (pwhysall)
         Re: Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color termi - (n01) - (1)
             Cool, that seems to be *half* the problem - (drewk)
         :syntax on OSLT, put in .vimrc -NT - (deSitter) - (7)
             It's there, syntax *is* being hilighted - (drewk) - (6)
                 Then check $TERM - (deSitter) - (5)
                     $TERM is Eterm - (drewk) - (4)
                         Are you using E-Term? - (folkert) - (3)
                             Yes, E-Term - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I believe that... - (folkert) - (1)
                                     Tried it - (drewk)

Per nostra Pentium Quatro cum 2 gigahertzum e bus de cuatrocentum megahertzum...
Deo Gratie...
Per nostros Quinientum Doce megabaitum de RAMus...
Deo Gratie...
Per nostra GeForsum Duo Mu Omega cum centum ventiocho megabytum de memoria Delta Delta Rho...
Deo Gratie...
E por nostro casum de aluminum con sweetum modus e infinitum blinkenlightenus...
Amen
127 ms