dkime-linux:~$ dpkg -l | grep vim
ii vim 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii vim-common 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - Common files
Not gvim ... vim
dkime-linux:~$ dpkg -l | grep vim
ii vim 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor ii vim-common 6.3-015+1 Vi IMproved - Common files ===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001. |
Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color terminal?
- (drewk)
- (15)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 01:05:09 PM EDT
Yes.
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 02:42:51 PM EDT
Not gvim ... vim
- (drewk)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 03:27:30 PM EDT
Two things.
- (static)
- (1)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 09:37:51 PM EDT
Yes, syntax is on in the new vimrc
-NT
- (drewk)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 05:11:48 PM EDT
ln -sf /usr/bin/emacs /usr/bin/vim
- (pwhysall)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 12:29:05 PM EDT
Re: Any idea why vim 6.3 doesn't know I've got a color termi
- (n01)
- (1)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 05:26:44 AM EDT
Cool, that seems to be *half* the problem
- (drewk)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 09:00:01 AM EDT
:syntax on OSLT, put in .vimrc
-NT
- (deSitter)
- (7)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 08:56:45 AM EDT
It's there, syntax *is* being hilighted
- (drewk)
- (6)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 09:02:04 AM EDT
Then check $TERM
- (deSitter)
- (5)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 12:07:50 PM EDT
$TERM is Eterm
- (drewk)
- (4)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 01:22:29 PM EDT
Are you using E-Term?
- (folkert)
- (3)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 02:34:51 PM EDT
Yes, E-Term
- (drewk)
- (2)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 02:45:58 PM EDT
I believe that...
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 03:27:02 PM EDT
Tried it
- (drewk)
- Sept. 22, 2004, 03:58:43 PM EDT