IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why would he?
It's only the second most important work of literature in the English Language, after Beowulf.

The fact that most people in North America are ignorant of their language's history (and indeed of its beauty in its permutations through time) doesn't mean we all have to toss aside constructions and words because they don't appear in American Pop Culture anymore.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Because it isn't really in our language?
What we know today as English is more properly known as Modern English. This is usually dated as starting from the Great Vowel Shift during the reign of Queen Elizabeth 1. Even so, we don't accept the latitude of spelling that, say, Shakespeare enjoyed.

Chaucer spoke a closely related language (we can mostly read it, but couldn't understand it spoken) called Middle English. You can get a sample at [link|http://www.librarius.com/gy.htm|http://www.librarius.com/gy.htm]. Most people have trouble reading it, and a lot of the words there aren't words in English as well.

Beuwulf is in Old English, or Anglo-Saxon which is incomprehensible to most, see [link|http://www.georgetown.edu/labyrinth/library/oe/texts/a4.1.html|http://www.georgetow...e/texts/a4.1.html] for a sample. As an example of how different even basic grammatical concepts were, English today has no genders. Anglo-Saxon had no less than 5 genders (strong masculine, weak masculine, neuter, weak feminine, strong feminine). Virtually any Latin-based word that we use today was not part of the language. A good number of the words that we kept are now swear-words (eg fuck) or bears a negative connotation (eg cunt vs vagina).

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New Weird
I actually have an easier time understanding Chaucer when spoken than I do when reading it.

'Course, I can neither read nor understand Beowulf in its original form.

That said, there are still many things in Chaucer that are found in today's english; while the spelling and pronunciation are different, the words are the same... when you listen to them and apply the middle english "accent".
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New You wouldn't understand Chaucer speaking it, though
When it is spoken by a modern speaker, the language is mangled to sound more like it does now. In particular you undo the effects of the great vowel shift.

I've heard reconstructions of what it could have sounded like. I completely couldn't understand them.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New I dunno
the guy who was reading it was an English prof here. There was a very large difference in the vowel sounds he was using from modern english... sounded dutch almost. However, after a few lines, it was pretty obvious which went where (to me anyway) and I had no trouble understanding it after that.

'Course, I was also reading it at the same time he was, just not out loud:)

That was back in the mid-eighties, when I was taking English, Ancient Greek, Latin, and Symbolic Logic.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New The Knight's Tale, in "Middle English"
[excerpts - as must natch be deGuidoized, me droogies]

First, from the [link|http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-old?id=Cha2Can&images=images/modeng&data=/lv1/Archive/mideng-parsed&tag=public&part=1&division=div1|
Knight's Portrait]
43: A knyght ther was, and that a worthy man,
[A K'nik't there waas, and that a ware-e-thy m(o)n]
44: That fro the tyme that he first bigan
45: To riden out, he loved chivalrie,
46: Trouthe and honour, fredom and curteisie.
47: Ful worthy was he in his lordes werre,
48: And therto hadde he riden, no man ferre,
49: As wel in cristendom as in hethenesse,
50: And evere honoured for his worthynesse.
51: At alisaundre he was whan it was wonne.
52: Ful ofte tyme he hadde the bord bigonne
53: Aboven alle nacions in pruce;
54: In lettow hadde he reysed and in ruce,
55: No cristen man so ofte of his degree.
56: In gernade at the seege eek hadde he be
57: Of algezir, and riden in belmarye.
58: At lyeys was he and at satalye,
59: Whan they were wonne; and in the grete see
60: At many a noble armee hadde he be.
61: At mortal batailles hadde he been fiftene,
62: And foughten for oure feith at tramyssene
63: In lystes thries, and ay slayn his foo.
64: This ilke worthy knyght hadde been also
65: Somtyme with the lord of palatye
66: Agayn another hethen in turkye.


[link|http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-old?id=Cha2Can&images=images/modeng&data=/lv1/Archive/mideng-parsed&tag=public&part=2&division=div1| The Knight's Tale]
987: He faught, and slough hym manly as a knyght
988: In pleyn bataille, and putte the folk to flyght;
989: And by assaut he wan the citee after,
990: And rente adoun bothe wall and sparre and rafter;
991: And to the ladyes he restored agayn
992: The bones of hir housbondes that were slayn,
993: To doon obsequies, as was tho the gyse.
994: But it were al to longe for to devyse
995: The grete clamour and the waymentynge
996: That the ladyes made at the brennynge
997: Of the bodies, and the grete honour
998: That theseus, the noble conquerour,
999: Dooth to the ladyes, whan they from hym wente;
1000: But shortly for to telle is myn entente.
1001: Whan that this worthy duc, this theseus,
1002: Hath creon slayn, and wonne thebes thus,
1003: Stille in that feeld he took al nyght his reste,
1004: And dide with al the contree as hym leste.
1005: To ransake in the taas of bodyes dede,


I still remember the (as taught) pronunciations of many of the words, now grateful for having been 'forced' to memorize some passages. It was/is fun to speak and - I challenge the assertion that it's incomprehensible. With an hour or two drill/practice, actually paying Attention - it indeed rolls trippingly off the tongue, and from even this vast chasm across events. And maybe especially - amidst today's Great Silliness.

Surely the engrams activated by this minor exercise, gave first clues about Language itself.. sneaky, that Teacher. Doing/Saying 'Chaucer' connected lots of fragments and hints about how our brains (this one anyway) grab something expressible out of the infinite soup accumulated thus (that) far.

You Can at least begin to 'feel' why it is, that C. survived.. all the way to the Great Regression of the post-literate Era-of-Distracting-Toys. (I deem that, if "all work and no play" makes Jack a dull boy; all play and no work: begets a nation of inarticulate Dubyas, Rushes and Murican Idols ---> Our Futchah.)

[Though countering this assertion -at least superficially- I see: My Gramma! knew some Chaucer - and she was a Dubya/Rush surrogate.] What's that about All Generalizations Being False? Merely memorizing Chaucer is hardly appreciating the cat, or why he survived even in superficial Murica, at least up to ~ 50 years ago.

Yes, one needs a glossary for such 'wer-des' as brennynge, waymentynge and the like. But the fluidity of metre -as spoken- and the sense of each phrase: Comes Through. 'Course such lore is irrelevant to getting your drivers license, MBA and that job at WallBurger. Evidently even the name 'Chaucer' shall become as unfamiliar as Agamemnon or Hypatia - if not already so.






But WTF - can Chaucer in NewSpeak be far behind?
Props fer the swingin Nonne, that habit habitu\ufffd with bling-blings...
(from the Prurient Priory of Pecksniffery, LLC)
ch-aa ch-aa ch-aaa
New Of course we can read Middle English, Ash.
We can read YOUR posts, can't we?


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New No dice.. that's Advanced.
Ya insufferable twit -














Defenders of the Subordinate Clause LLC
Subversively undoing damaged attention spans everywhere, wrought by Digi-speak TLAs and MAN-pages


extralinguistic yammerers - outside the province of linguistics

:-\ufffd
     It's a wonder you're alive... - (CRConrad) - (40)
         Ah, so sorry I missed that - (Nightowl) - (38)
             NNNGH. - (pwhysall) - (37)
                 Oops - (Nightowl) - (34)
                     It WASN'T EVEN IN the Subject: line, you stupid FUCKING cow! - (CRConrad)
                     Owl, be very forgiving, this one knows not what he doth - (dmarker) - (32)
                         I know EXACTLY what I'm doing, fuckwit. - (CRConrad) - (30)
                             "instead" not "in stead". HTH. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (22)
                                 oh shit, duck -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                     Fire in the hole! -NT - (inthane-chan)
                                     Wrong simile - (jake123)
                                 You really sure on that? I think I've seen both... - (CRConrad) - (18)
                                     Goose, as in poke: "Don't goose the testy Swede" -NT - (drewk)
                                     From what I remember - (Arkadiy) - (11)
                                         If it's good enough for Chaucer, it's good enough for me... - (CRConrad) - (9)
                                             Geoffrey Chaucer (ca.1343-1400) - (Arkadiy) - (8)
                                                 Why would he? - (jake123) - (7)
                                                     Because it isn't really in our language? - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                                                         Weird - (jake123) - (5)
                                                             You wouldn't understand Chaucer speaking it, though - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                                                 I dunno - (jake123)
                                                                 The Knight's Tale, in "Middle English" - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                     Of course we can read Middle English, Ash. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                                         No dice.. that's Advanced. - (Ashton)
                                         No, stead is still a word - (jake123)
                                     "In stead" .eq. "instead" - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                         Or those not accustomed to using obsolete forms in - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                             Not necessarily obsolete in Actual English. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                 er__________{cackle}___Home Sweet Home Stead -NT - (Ashton)
                                                 Because. - (mmoffitt)
                             A definition... - (danreck) - (1)
                                 Here ya go: - (CRConrad)
                             A challenge - (dmarker) - (4)
                                 Let's see YOU show ANYTHING, first. - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                     Stopped your foul mouth for once - (dmarker) - (2)
                                         Stalling, stalling, stalling... - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                             WTF is this [anti-] Chinese fetish? - (Ashton)
                         I'm always very forgiving, as a rule. - (Nightowl)
                 is the lesbian or the bike black? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                     you choose :) -NT - (pwhysall)
         Gads... yew r so californicationious. - (folkert)

Lichen shows more autonomy.
74 ms