IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Explaining Ross's homophobia.
Was looking at the blimp thread, decided to look at other threads by the same guy - voila.

[link|http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=220602|http://boards.straig...read.php?t=220602]

Short answer: It's genetic. Don't blame him.

(Posted in here because it's going to touch off a shitstorm.)
"I'll stop calling this crew 'Orwellian' when they stop using 1984 as an operations manual." - J. Bradford DeLong
New his biology is a dodgy as his argument
The only thing worse than watching granny porn is starring in granny porn
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New His biology is essentially wishful thinking
OTOH that puts it on par with a lot of what passes for "evolutionary thinking" on topics which people care about.

Which I take to be a symptom of people being more interested in finding the right conclusion than coming up with a solid understanding of the phenomena at hand.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New If it wasn't headed for a flame-fest...
...I probably would have stuck it in Oh Pun.
"I'll stop calling this crew 'Orwellian' when they stop using 1984 as an operations manual." - J. Bradford DeLong
New Always been wondering
What does OTOH mean and what does HTH mean?

Thanks.

Nightowl >8#


"To become different from what we are, we must have some awareness of what we are."
Eric Hoffer
New On The Other Hand and Happy To Help
Here are [link|http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/|a few more].

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New "Hope This Helps", I always thought. (Your link agrees! :-)
New I always thought you meant hope to hell :-)
The only thing worse than watching granny porn is starring in granny porn
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Hit the Highway?
-----------------------------------------
"If you don't vote, it's your fault!"

George W. "I cannot tell a lie"
George W. B. "I cannot tell a lie from lie related program acitivites"

jb4
New Huh, multiple options
[link|http://www.gaarde.org/acronyms/?lookup=H|http://www.gaarde.org/acronyms/?lookup=H] lists both expansions. And "happy to help" is definitely the way that I learned it. But from a google search, "hope this helps" is about 10x more popular than "happy to help".

Live and learn.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New Maybe a bit more plausible wrt racism/xenophobia, though?:-(
New Phobos = Fear
I a'int asceered a' no fags. I find their behavior repulsive and sad.
-drl
New Funny, I find *your* behvaiour repulsive and sad.
John. Busy lad.
New Great! Glad to know it
I stand by the values that make good safe normal worlds, not sterile amalgams of hedonist freaks.
-drl
New Like fuck, you do.
You stand by the kind of values that got the Inquisition where they were. "Ooh! It's different! It's heresy! I fear it! BURN HIM!"

If that's The American Way, you can stuff it.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
New Re: Like fuck, you do.
Who said anything about persecuting them? I feel sorry for the poor freaks. Would you want to be a freak? What I said - repeat - is that I find them repulsive and wish to avoid them. I feel it is in the best interest of a healthly balanced society to avoid the deliberate destruction of its most basic institutions, like child care and marriage.

-drl
New You fear it, all right.
All the blather to the contrary cannot hide that.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
New You sad sack of shit.
Wonder if you even realise that you sound EXACTLY like all fucking Nazi / KKK / whatever scumbags throughout history...? Naah, probably not.

And no, you're probably not "asceered a' no" OTHER "fags" -- more likely, you're "asceered" of the possibility that you might be one yourself.

You really ought to learn when to SHUT THE HELL UP, you fuckwit.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
You know you're doing good work when you get flamed by an idiot. -- [link|http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/34218.html|Andrew Wittbrodt]
New Really
A society that explicitly endorses perversion is as good as dead. Of course one could argue that the endorsement is a symptom, not a cause. That's more likley IMO. It's most likely alreadly over for the West. Done in by self-indulgence and hedonism, and the idea that "fair and just" equals "do your own thing" equals "do your brother's thing".

Of course it's all a piece with feminism and the ruination of women by a society that has lost its real love for them and the care they once embodied. A society that literally despises children by refusing to raise them right.

You can have it friend.



-drl
New You know what you should do?
If you don't already belong to one, seek out the nearest Southern Baptist Church and start attending weekly. I think you'll find a lot of people there who are kindred spirits. You might also want to start watching The 700 Club with Pat Robertson - he definitely shares many of your views.

And may I add that the bullshit you are spouting here is the main reason I wanted to get the hell out of the South. I was afraid that I might actually raise children who would repeat some of that same drivel - as pervasive as it is amongst the inbred.
bcnu,
Mikem

I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.
New Re: You know what you should do?
It's absurd - by expressing my own opinion (which is well founded), everyone here immediately collectivizes like a hive of angry bees, proving my exact point! Rally round the queen! Throw the infidel out! He's got his own opinion! Cast him to the evil Baptists!

But you see, the Baptists are just like you bees - utterly collectivized to the point of being nothing but a collage of other people's ideas.

Are there any MEN left? Where the hell did everyone go? You've made whores and uncaring slatterns of the women, you've ruined the kids with overindulgence and lack of any discipline or expectation, you've destroyed the idea of representative government, you've annihilated marriage, you've made a joke of science, you've erased the entire ethos of scholarship, you've dishonored the dead, you've pissed on, spit on, stomped on, defiled every decent tradition that ever existed, and what do you have to put in its place? A tolerance for buttfucking.

YOU go to the fucking Baptists - merge your Church of Chickenshit Sameness with their Virgin Gangster God.

There is no South, there is no North, there is only the boundless mediocrity of the Land of Craven Weenies.


-drl
New Let me get this straight.
You've taken offense at the fact that your espousing bigoted, intolerant opinions is frowned on by the folks here?

You are absolutely entitled to your opinions. But when they are as offensive and inane as the ones you listed above, do try to hide them. Or find a more receptive forum. Rantings similar to yours can be found here:
[link|http://christianactionleague.net/modules/news/index.php?storytopic=8&storynum=10|http://christianacti...pic=8&storynum=10]

Go there when you want to post your wholly without merit opinions.
bcnu,
Mikem

I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.
New The men are waiting for the boys to tire of fighting
...then we they will wade in and send them to bed without supper.
I was one of the original authors of VB, and *I* wouldn't use VB for a text
processing program. :-)
Michael Geary, on comp.lang.python
New {sigh} Orthogonal to this juicy flamefest..
(OK I like orthogonal; it's a fey disdainful Insider word; needs only the Publically-encrypted key & handshake, to intimidate the dysliterati.)

IMhO - Ross merely 'sounds' like some of the trodlodytes dredged up here. Unfortunately.. for a Quick-Pick of these black/white faux-sides, I think he's on the horns of a more subtle dilemma here, and has failed to er explicate? exactly where his 'instinctual' judgments are meeting a basic metaphysical barrier ->| So not everyone is a Cicero, eh?

Where to begin, when a tangent is approaching an asymptote? WTF, let's try this:

Look, Puritanism, "the nagging fear that Somewhere, SomeHow Someone.. is enjoying himself.." -- this pernicious afterglow of the Hugely misogynistic metaphor of that Garden/Eden thing -

["Blame Snake - He Made Me Eat of the Fruit"; Oh, for Xians - Snake==Woman]

Puritanism is by now so deeply ingrained in what passes for Murican kultur, only very few have ever been able to cleanse their souls of its pernicious putrefying effects. The language itself has now adsorbed connotations of Pleasure/Sex == Bad and You Were Born Guilty .. and all the rest of the horseshit that is inculcated from the day little babies get pink or blue nappies.

Now, from such a deranged milieu.. just throw in :-0
Non-Standard pleasurable / sexual acting-out -- and watch the neurons go into anaphylactic SHOCK. And.. they do.

THAT is where this thread really began from, and countless ones since even before the Inquisition, even before the suppressing of all those early scrolls (and the ones that really did get burned). Precisely! as the Conquistadores 'bulldozed' all vestiges of the culture they came solely: to loot, just South of the current 'looted' US. (We're well practised in that method, we see.)

Folks, this discussion and most like it - completely omit the pre-Xian rich civilizations of the kind: *Not* dedicated to perpetual warfare; *Not* dedicated to the perpetual protection of the fragile male-ego and the relegation of 'females' to: 3rd Class servitors, nonentities disallowed from participation in the fruits of labour, the spiritual life and intellectual aspirations of the entire group. yada yada.

In brief, it's my opinion that - from within this milieu, and from no personal information about That Which Was Destroyed by and since ~ the plan of Constantine: there can't BE any semi-objective assessment of 'sexuality' or even pleasurable activity: just black/white spluttering.

I accept Ross's assertion that ~ "he doesn't harbor malice re 'homosexuals'" - even though I cannot see that he demonstrates a sustainable perspective which is not infected by rampant Puritanism too, (probably all unawares).
[And THAT: would be Hard to Do, given the history of our constricted Consciousness.]
BTW: 'Perversion' is a word which presupposes that one possesses a clear experience of The Sublime: First. See the Catch?

Nor may I pretend to have cleansed my own early-conditioning .. back to pre-Constantine, less intentionally malicious days: I only claim to see that the damage has been continuous, progressive and - possibly Terminal:

Terminal? Yes -
Given the proliferation of Heartless Mindless very-efficient nuclear Infernal Devices: embraced and yes, Loved.. in that perverse sense of the word, if you constructed a {ugh} sentence, "Cheney loves ____"




Arguing about whether "homosexuality is Right" - is IMhO tantamount to seeking to convince via the [link|http://webpages.charter.net/djhalnon/anselm.html| Ontological Proof of Gawd]; it's so fucked it's not even Wrong.

Lastly - I don't really give a shit how "Ross's social development / skills" .. "measure up/down" with mine, yours or some Mythical Average within Puritan Murica '04. I just won't rank him with KKK, Nazis - for a value judgment which is weighted towards [hopes for] "survival beyond the inane 00s" of a bunch of effete, spoiled non-voting Consumer Yuppies whose actual God is: The Acquisition of Limitless $$. By any means Possible.

Such a 'culture' needs to die; it need not take all the people with it -- but, WTF do *you* think the neoconmen Preverts of the world will do with Limitless Power? Let some others Get Away???

So: bite me.



Maybe we can have a small chat about Constantine + the Xian Rewrite, sometime: endless sardonic fun, that Massive Coup over sentience! His was an early Fatherland Security Sweep - with full lethal Powers over any recalcitrant Ones. Effective as Hell (prolly still effective in those who believe in such fantasy, Literally. Still.) This is already too long.


Ashton,
incorrigible, most likely
New Re: {sigh} Orthogonal to this juicy flamefest..
Thank you for thinking, which is more than can be said for the irascible Norsemen, but..

My point is that the entire idea of "equalism" as Mags puts it - "androgyny" as I would state it - is a destructive derangement of natural order, and that its most obvious manifestations are the physical perversion of homosexuality and the mental perversion of blind feminism, and that both of these have their common origin in a deranged disembodiment of the anima in both individuals and the collective - if drawn farther, this derangement could easily be shown to be the origin of most of our other woes. One does not tinker with nature and get away with it. I cannot expect anyone who is unfamiliar with the symbolic ideas, and who lacks simple skills of observation without prejudice, to understand this perspective - so I quit with the final statement:

Feminism and homosexuality are in fact disguised hatred of women and children and their natural relation to each other.

-drl
New Redux.
blah blah blah I hate queers blah blah I might be one blah blah I'm afeared of that fact blah blah did I mention I hate women too blah blah especially strong women blah blah they should all go back to being brood mothers and housewives blah blah equality is for white men only blah blah the good old days blah blah.

And Ashton, you should be ashamed of supporting this ridiculous viewpoint. It's 2004, not 1804.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
New Straw queer.
C'mon Peter, your brain is more original than that. I didn't PICK 'sides' in this faux-dichotomy - remember?

It doesn't matter that (too) often -- your stereotypical analysis of homophobia IS.. quite close enough for government work; I mean.. some of the slavering hordes with pitchforks Are that lawful prey!

I don't see Ross's putative -phobia nor steely-suppressed envy. And not hatred in its various telltale forms. If you think you do (see such) . . .

I also don't know that the Jung / animus syntax (or other archetypal approach to human fucked-uppedness) -- is without its own recursive flaws: few things involving 'us' are ever reducible to algorithms. That idea is a conceit of not just er programmers. It's an equivalent of The Market Will Correct, for those whose religion is Econ 101A, and who see 'humans' as decimal points on their generated graphs. It compiles: it must be Truth.

(A similar flaccid digital-think as in those who can also stomach the Social-Darwinist Neoconmen because: they be so Efficient at clearing out the Undesirables.. which screw up *their* inane spreadsheets diagramming Authority Rulez.) Clear out these pissy nonconformist outliers and THEN -- we can calculate the velocity of money into our offshore accounts, to the nearest penny. Same class of vicious reduction of humans to 'entries' - by people with stunted emotional age ~11. Lots of these around. Majority??

ie. if you want to refute Ross's model, you have to refute it - not impute troglodyte transparent ugliness of the chain-queers-to-fences sort. Repeat: (Ross says) he doesn't 'Hate Queers'. Or envy same etc. The comments on the form of the sex, now (!) - I deem gratuitous and counterproductive. Don't Do that, Ross! It gets you: methinks the gentleman doth protest too much.

WTF - analyze the motions of a decent orgasm (let alone the internal mental acrobatics -- after all, the most Erotic part of the body is ... the Mind) -- and it's *all* stuff for Monty Python wink/nudge ...
WhatsItLike, huh.. WhatsItLike !?

(Even Vulcans forget that curl grad V = 0, when the annual green testosterone flood hits the old limbic system..)

The fact that this self-selected group, demonstrably possessing 52 cards and even a couple spare Jokers in the deck -- is unclear about the tenuous fabric of "our '04 civilization ??" -- Is a bit unnerving though. To moi, anyway.

Chicken Little had a rather dull vocabulary; WTF, she was a fucking chicken. We. Have. Nukes. and are likely about to use them (if a LOT goes wrong between now and November Two Thousand and Four)

Screw the Queers AND the Heteros and their internal clockworks:
THE FUCKING SKY *IS* FALLING !!


Ashtonradamus
Find a Way to get the fucking Neoconmen back into their padded cells, you assholes; screw the dance about Who's Tougher on Crime or Hates Sin Most.
New Re: Straw queer.
The basis of my argument is a desire to have and live in a productive culture. A culture that can't properly inhabit the masculine and feminine principles equally will die.

A similar thing happens with self/shadow splits - the Nazis, for example, identified their "self" with Aryan perfection, and so projected their "shadow" onto Jews and outcasts. We know the results. Anima/animus problems are not as dire but they do lead to sterility. The creative faculty needs inspiration tempered by judgement to generate ideas (masculine) and then needs feeling tempered by sensation to give them form (feminine). A society with "female issues" coming from a warped anima image will be safety obsessed, unable to create new things,and obsessed with "relating", be it by sex, prison, corporate work, politics... One with "male issues" will be unable to properly structure creative energy, and so obsessed with "newness", be it by nomadic wandering, pillaging and plunder, short-term plans without regard for permanence of effectiveness.

Thus - the ultimate reason feminism and HS repel me, is that they are sterile and inherently moribund.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with "homophobia" (what a stupid word). It has to do with "ambiphilia" - love of balance.

-drl
New My 2 pence
IMnaaHO[1] what pisses Ross off most is the unjustifiable extreme to which a large part of modern society has carried the goal of "equality of the sexes". Was there a time when it was "normal" to believe that men were "better" than women, or more "deserving" of $foo? Yes. Is it a Good Thing[tm] that it is now generally unacceptable to profess such blanket judgements? Again, yes.

But what too many people have forgotten is that just because neither gender is "better" than the other, that doesn't mean they're the same. In general:
  • Men are larger than women
  • Men are more agressive than women
  • Women have better communication skills than men
  • Women have more of a nurturing instinct than men
  • etc. etc. etc. ...
Does this mean that only women should raise children? Absolutely not. Does it mean that only men should be police officers? No.

But political correctness has gone too damn far when it's unacceptable to observe that the average man is more likely to pass the physical part of the entrance exam to be a firefighter than the average woman. To suggest that maybe some women would actually prefer to stay home and raise their children than to drop them in day care and go to work.

Would society be better off if it were widely preferred that someone stay home to raise the kids? Probably. Do the apparent general tendancies of our genders suggest that that would result in more women staying home? Probably. Does that make me a mysoginistic neanderthal who thinks all women should be breed sows? Not even close.

From what I've read of Ross' position, he's mostly saying that women and men are different; and that encouraging men to act more like women and women to act more like men is taking "equality" too far.[2]



[1] not-at-all

[2] Yes, that reads somewhat like a "separate but equal" argument. It's not.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New 'Fact' extrapolated from complete ignorance of the subjects?
Seems you don't know two fifths of nine eigths of fuck-all about homosexuality, or feminism/equality of the sexes, etc.
No, "it's bad coz it's not all about me and my extreme manliness, grrrr, watch me beat my chest" does not count as knowledge of the subject.

Hope you're enjoying being consumed by your hatred of all things 'not-me'.
John. Dickhead-intolerant.
New Re: 'Fact' extrapolated from complete ignorance of the subje
Chest-beating machoism is yet another expression of a deranged anima-image expressing as vanity (consider for example the rigid codes of presentation in biker gangs, a very anima-dominated group) and in itself is every bit as repulsive as the most preening effeminateness of the fairest of fairies - overcompensation for being dominated by the Unrestricted Feminine. Actual maleness would be found more in, say, the understated, controlled behavior of test pilots.

Note that an ideal balance involves both feminine and masculine expression - one needs the former for "structure" and the latter for "direction". When one or the other is projected, the remaining side expresses negatively. Our entire society is so in the grip of a negative projected anima-image that it is impossible for most people to see clear of it.

You show that you do not understand what I am saying with the above comment.
-drl
New I will take at face value that you dont hate queers
I think that at any given time in history there is an average percentile that prefer their own sex for sexual activities with slight fluctuations.

It is only in times of societal stress that such tendancies tend to come into the open, not demanding space alongside as much as demanding a right to live not in fear. As a society sways right and left due to economic stress there always emerges a hedonistic group that flings all sense of survival out the window and lives for the sexual moment. This includes hetro nympho sapho homo and lesbo tendencies along with bestiality and ritual bloodletting. Because this black entre is visible half the population is horified and the other half is secretly titillated while pretending to be horrified.

As we are all sexual creatures and during teen years hormones are raging this hedonistic fringe attracts perfectly normal hetro folks who want to "experiment" notice todays middle schoolers proclivity for oral sex. You arnt cool if as a 12 yo gal you havnt baba'd a bobo. There is ample evidence that young female collegians have an almost 50% ratio of "fooling around with other girls" because it is cool. Boys tend to hang with boys and if there is a 10%er in the midst a few will say what the hell I aint queer he is and experiment away.

After an openist era ages it is always replaced with a fanatical repression as those who played grow older and place blame on the gay folks down the street for their own sexual issues and causes reprobation, hatred and harm. This has played out so many times it is cyclic in nature.

Just in our own century we have the roaring 20's, depression where gangsters and molls were accoladed (John Dillenger got headaches if he didnt have regular punch while in Prison) The Berlin scene in the early 30's Adolph's pet bumboy Ernst Rohm, Errol Flynn's notorious paties and Beria's penchant for chirrun.

All of these were followed by making homosexuality a crime punishable by death, lengthy jail sentences or vigilantism.

Well society is in a turmoil again what with the industrial age being traded for the information age and the hedonism of the 60's being rehashed in the 90's but with AIDs as the levellor so it is a matter of time before the worm turns and it will be national sacrifice and the first to get sacrificed are always the different.

Ross I know you feel the current imbalance and the ensuing chaos but lets hope those of us who are exposed will spot the pendulem swing soon enough to get the fuck out of the line of fire.

thanx,
bill
calling the demo primaries since [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=2275|http://z.iwethey.org...ow?contentid=2275]
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Not bad.
Boxlish is at least a compressed language :-\ufffd

I'd add (as to symptoms of dis-integration):

Body piercings ['Pierce' - now a er staple character in daily paper comix] Pierced Genitals !?
Diet-to death, bullemia and related
Intensified homogenization; you MUST wear really shitty-looking baggy pants.
Cap MUST be [forward/backward] - depending on local Authority Figure's sense of shitty-chic.
American Idol | Elimidate | FOX-anything | Ann Coulter (not smothered at birth)

and... resoundingly,

the fact that Neoconmen managed! a coup in the midst of the flag-wavinest
In-duh-vidualist kultur a Jingoist ever lusted-after -- even so far as to install a Pecksniff Pope in place of the "Justice System"! cha cha cha



So if all THIS does not constitute a small 'suggestion' of just how it is that the sexual stuff Also Got Fucked Up -?- I don't know what that would take...
New must protest at your use of language
you MUST wear really shitty-looking baggy pants.

as I explain to my one baggy son "MUST you wear really baggy pants that look as though they have been shat in?" walking like he is hiding a stray log.
thanx.
bill
calling the demo primaries since [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=2275|http://z.iwethey.org...ow?contentid=2275]
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Well, baggy pants sure are about implying the large log...
...just a different type of wood than what you're thinking of.
"I'll stop calling this crew 'Orwellian' when they stop using 1984 as an operations manual." - J. Bradford DeLong
New Don't forget to add the Apprentice show to your list
I caught one of those last week and I have to say that I was amused in a gory car accident kind of way - I knew I shouldn't look (I didn't want to look) but I just had to look. If this one show doesn't epitomize the death of our culture, then I can't watch the one that does. America, "you're fired".

I believe that many in our fora are sucked in to this obvious little "election year political" tarbaby issue because they believe that it will further their electoral goals. I understand and agree with much of what Ross says. He could definately soften the language, but I never really gave a rat's ass about political correctness to begin with.

If egg and sperm do not unite, then the species does not propogate... In this sense, homosexuality is probably "unnatural". Having said that, natural does not equate to good. Arsenic is natural. Additionally, I believe that homosexuality is most probably inate, which then makes the "unnatural" argument even more specious... Perhaps this genetic makeup puts homosexuals as outlyers as opposed to being unnatural. My daughter has a genetic "defect" (Down Syndrome). I think of her as an outlyer and not unnatural or defective.

I think that homosexuality is most probably innate. I base this premise on purely anecdotal evidence (my life). I do not look at other men in a sexual way. It would be very hard to "teach" me to think otherwise. Given that belief, I do not fear homosexuality will "spread" to me or my children just by proximity. Teachers should continue to teach. Boy Scout leaders should continue to lead boy scouts. Until someone shows me decent statistics that prove that homosexuals have a higher proclivity for child molestation than the non-homosexual population, I can't see the point in discrimination of jobs.

Now, as for marriage - I don't see it as black and white. There is the civil union that the state recognizes (marriage certificate, divorce decrees, etc...) and there is the marriage ceremony. I can think of absolutely no reason why gays shouldn't be able to have the civil union. Even our President agrees with this, so let's move on...

Marriage is predominately a religious ceremony. Each culture has its own rules. In India and many other parts of the world, arranged marriages are the norm. In Nigeria and many other African countries, bigomy is the norm. The countries laws are set up to accomodate these "norms". Traditional Western Judeo-Christian "norms" (though not always one man and one woman) have always stated/strongly implied that at least one member of each sex be represented. I see the reason why this debate is so heated. I also see the "logic" behind not being a gay hating homophobic troglodyte if you hold an opinion that says, gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. It is strongly engrained in the ethos as well as the mythos. I believe that the reason gay advocates are so strongly pushing their black/white "either your for us or you're against us" rhetoric is pent up (closeted) frustration of having to deal with life as an outlyer.

Having said that, because of the way our insurance, tax laws, etc... are set up to discern only between "married and single", it would be a hell of a lot easier for the state to sanction unions/marriages between gays. If people insist on formally bestowing "second class" status on gay marriages, let them be known as garriages or what not. Make them wear a scarlet "G" when they want to visit their spouses in the hospital.

What's the hoopla? I have kids... I'm not going to teach them that gay people are anything other than different. Just like kids with Down Syndrome are different. Not less than, different.

Ashton, have I mentioned that I hate election years?
Just a few thoughts,

Danno
     Explaining Ross's homophobia. - (inthane-chan) - (35)
         his biology is a dodgy as his argument -NT - (boxley)
         His biology is essentially wishful thinking - (ben_tilly) - (8)
             If it wasn't headed for a flame-fest... - (inthane-chan)
             Always been wondering - (Nightowl) - (5)
                 On The Other Hand and Happy To Help - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                     "Hope This Helps", I always thought. (Your link agrees! :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - (3)
                         I always thought you meant hope to hell :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                             Hit the Highway? -NT - (Silverlock)
                         Huh, multiple options - (ben_tilly)
             Maybe a bit more plausible wrt racism/xenophobia, though?:-( -NT - (CRConrad)
         Phobos = Fear - (deSitter) - (11)
             Funny, I find *your* behvaiour repulsive and sad. -NT - (Meerkat) - (4)
                 Great! Glad to know it - (deSitter) - (3)
                     Like fuck, you do. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                         Re: Like fuck, you do. - (deSitter) - (1)
                             You fear it, all right. - (pwhysall)
             You sad sack of shit. - (CRConrad) - (5)
                 Really - (deSitter) - (4)
                     You know what you should do? - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                         Re: You know what you should do? - (deSitter) - (2)
                             Let me get this straight. - (mmoffitt)
                             The men are waiting for the boys to tire of fighting - (FuManChu)
         {sigh} Orthogonal to this juicy flamefest.. - (Ashton) - (12)
             Re: {sigh} Orthogonal to this juicy flamefest.. - (deSitter) - (11)
                 Redux. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                     Straw queer. - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Re: Straw queer. - (deSitter)
                         My 2 pence - (drewk)
                 'Fact' extrapolated from complete ignorance of the subjects? - (Meerkat) - (1)
                     Re: 'Fact' extrapolated from complete ignorance of the subje - (deSitter)
                 I will take at face value that you dont hate queers - (boxley) - (4)
                     Not bad. - (Ashton) - (3)
                         must protest at your use of language - (boxley) - (1)
                             Well, baggy pants sure are about implying the large log... - (inthane-chan)
                         Don't forget to add the Apprentice show to your list - (danreck)

It requests to the errors of the tree of the activator of the exit in tribune of the suggestions.
213 ms