IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New And at least one other one.
This:
"While it's believable that kids will download and continue to download, it's far less believable that they'll actually drink Pepsi. Kids today are smarter than that."
Hysterically funny, IMO.

About this one, OTOH, I can't quite tell:
"Hey, tripping old ladies -- historically funny."
Is the writer (A) poking fun at the "historical relics", old people; or (B) claiming a long tradition of this sort of thing in the history of slapstick is a defense against accusations of tastelessness; or (C) just misspelling "hysterically"?

Personally, alas, I'm leaning towards (C); this Tim Goodman just doesn't seem to be a very good writer, in the "craftsmanship" sense of handling his own language. For another indicator of this, just look at his deplorable use of "semi[link|http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/|']s" as a plural.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
You know you're doing good work when you get flamed by an idiot. -- [link|http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/34218.html|Andrew Wittbrodt]
New ''' Posse
I go with C) too, or maybe D) he tells fart jokes, too.

Did you happen to read the letters at your linked site? (There are only a few in his 'forum' of weird jscript kind)

There are several links to like-minded orgs including this at [link|http://www.andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/a.html| Rutgers.]


. . .

Somehow we must make the occasional room for such increasingly necessary neologisms as [dumbth! and] fuckwit .. which need never be enhanced into polysyllabic 'explanation' - It Just Feels Right, as in the use of articles, "a" and "an" via sound.

In my parallel universe, Galileo's response would have been:
If you fuckwits think I am going to tell you It Doesn't Move, when a half-blind jackass can see that It Moves...

(Of course too, in my universe the priest class has shame; each knows that he doesn't know shit.. and is just faking it.)
New Re: And at least one other one.
I think he meant "historically in the sense of "B" with a generous dollop of irony, and while I join you in deploring that promiscuous apostrophe—semi's, indeed!—I've been generally impressed with Goodman these latter years, and regard his columns as among the few remaining reasons, along with Jon Carroll, to read the Chron. From today's riff on the episode:
Yes, clearly the boob thing and Nelly's crotch-grabbing didn't fit in with the Super Bowl ads touting long-term erections or Budweiser's guy- friendly misogyny, bestiality and flatulent horses. Somebody has to stand up for standards.

Maybe Janet's now-famous right breast was the break-point for the morality police. After all, it had been a less than wholesome day. See, there's a difference between throwing a football through a tire to illustrate, one would assume, that taking a tiny pill not only gives you a monster erection but also a good passing arm -- and flat-out nudity. Because if you're a parent and your kid says, "Mom and Dad -- why is that man throwing a football through a tire?," you can just ignore it or pretend to be sleeping. But it's hard to dismiss a breast, plain as day. You've got to tell Little Jimmy that was a CGI breast, not a real one; and Little Emma that, no, she can't get a silver sun pierced through her nipple.

All you want is some good old, violent American football, but instead you've got the Spice Channel.

Understood. But going beyond this particular context, it's a breast. And, truth be told, a damn good one. Is that more damaging than, say, having the networks show some drug-addicted perp get shot through the eye at 9 p.m. pretty much every night? We might be getting our collective panties in a twist here over the wrong thing. Just thinking out loud.
[link|http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/02/03/MNGH84NN631.DTL|http://sfgate.com/cg...3/MNGH84NN631.DTL]

Now, I personally missed this unprecedented, never-to-be-repeated opportunity to see Janet Jackson's exposed flesh—about two minutes into the halftime show I began to reflect, not for the first time, that the negrification of American popular culture has not been an unalloyed good, and retired to the kitchen to assemble additional snacks for the gathered guests—but I find all the cries of horror and calls for investigations and prosecutions pretty amusing. Remarkable what we're prepared to swallow in this country and what we gag on.

cordially,

Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.
New Regarding the standards of commercials
I have to agree, they weren't nearly as good or as funny as in past years. I was working a puzzle, and I've often done that during the game before, but this time I was a lot more interested in my puzzle than I was in the commercials. They were just flat and not that good or interesting, and bordered on downright disgusting at times.

I liked the donkey one, and the bears with the coke, and the Jimmi Hendrix one, but for the most part, it was a disappointment, nothing new and exciting and nothing that really stood out as in past years.

As for Halftime, I would have missed it, except that John had just come back into the room, and I was commenting on how badly they were singing. We both glanced at the TV in time to see it... just lucky, I guess. Hehe. And the streaker also happened to be a point where we were both looking.

Of course, we were also able to rewind and prove that we indeed saw what we thought we saw.

Still and all, it's kinda sad that the standards for the Super Bowl ads have fallen victim to the same degenerate corporate attitude as of late.

Nightowl >8#


"To become different from what we are, we must have some awareness of what we are."
Eric Hoffer
New Here's a group of people...
...who consider that boobs == bad:

[link|http://forums.crosswalk.com/webx/.209ebf74|http://forums.crossw...om/webx/.209ebf74]


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home Page - Now with added Zing!]
New Speaking of Jon Carroll (this time a mini-Shrub review) (new thread)
Created as new thread #139706 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=139706|Speaking of Jon Carroll (this time a mini-Shrub review)]
     Linked story provides an LRPDism - (lincoln) - (7)
         Re: Linked story provides an LRPDism - (deSitter)
         And at least one other one. - (CRConrad) - (5)
             ''' Posse - (Ashton)
             Re: And at least one other one. - (rcareaga) - (3)
                 Regarding the standards of commercials - (Nightowl)
                 Here's a group of people... - (pwhysall)
                 Speaking of Jon Carroll (this time a mini-Shrub review) (new thread) - (Ashton)

Consider the job: to build a structure based on live bone and meat that has to perform under extreme forces in one of the most corrosive environments on the planet. Has to look good too.
56 ms