IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New A plausible scenario
They get their big Islamic cleric get-together. They mull things over for a few days. Then they say, "Okay, we'll hand him over. OOOPS! We can't find him, he must have left the country."

They've done that ploy before in 1998. Now whether or not he actually does leave the country is almost immaterial - all they have to do is claim they don't know where he is. And (strictly speaking) they'd probably be telling the literal truth, even if they did know he was still in the country somewhere.
Rest in peace, Jeremy, Mark, Thomas, and whoever else who helped overpower the hijackers on Flight 93.
New The don't-know-where-he-is dodge only works if we let it.
Tell `em they'd damn well better find him fast. Make it their problem.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
New Who cares where 'he' is
Like a weed, lopping of just the top is not much good. If you want to get rid of thr problem you have to burn it down to the roots. You burn the roots, eventually you'll get the head as course
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New Yes, 'Fundament-al' problem with such an obsession is:
Suppose he's the epitome of psychologist - especially about Murican repetitive behavior. Suppose he takes his 'Beliefs' reeel Fundament-ally, as so many do, there AND here:

Goes to secret cave alone. Kills self (goes directly to the seraglio of 70, in the Sky). Taleban et all run around frantically.. *Really Trying* to find him (say). Can't. Say they can't!

We say: Suuuure you "Can't.."

Well... ???




A.
     Most Terrible Enemy. - (mmoffitt) - (23)
         Polarization - (gdaustin)
         The enemy of our enemy is not our friend. - (marlowe) - (9)
             The gravest mistake of the '60s peace movement . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
                 I came of age in the immediate aftermath of that. - (marlowe)
                 But we must all remember... - (mmoffitt)
                 Why just the sixties? - (Ashton) - (5)
                     It was all a lie, Ashton. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                         Exaggeration. - (Ashton) - (3)
                             I remain dubious. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                 Many were very serious - and some still are. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 An original explanation! and maybe, pretty good :-\ufffd - (Ashton)
         perhaps it worked - (tablizer) - (3)
             It Worked - (gdaustin)
             Time's Man of the Century. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 Remember our discussions - but I forget: Who finally got it? - (CRConrad)
         dont equate taliban and bin laden - (boxley) - (7)
             I am ignorant. - (mmoffitt)
             As soon as the Taliban hand over bin Laden... - (marlowe) - (5)
                 You've heard what the custom is re 'guests' - (Ashton) - (4)
                     A plausible scenario - (wharris2) - (3)
                         The don't-know-where-he-is dodge only works if we let it. - (marlowe) - (2)
                             Who cares where 'he' is - (Fearless Freep) - (1)
                                 Yes, 'Fundament-al' problem with such an obsession is: - (Ashton)

Minimal oversight is seen as more expensive and odious than frequent disaster.
55 ms