IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I remain dubious.
Are you *that* much older than I?

Admittedly, I was really a child of the 60's (born 9/9/59), but my father was a high school teacher and his students "baby-sat" my brother and me. This was in Southern California. Still, I wonder how much social progress was owed to the "heightened since of awareness" (apologies to Leary) generated from an artificially generated state of euphoria? Perhaps it was simply that the almost imperceivable minority of clearer minds were given greater voice owing to those of the drug-induced state of awareness? Did the progressives have a go only because a significant portion of the great, mindless American public was too stoned to notice? I think so.
New Many were very serious - and some still are.
The era was not nearly so drug sodden as the Hollywood image that has been built for it. The drugs were also very weak compared to what they are now. You could puff happily all night for what a couple of hits will do you for now.

Yes, there were "events" that were drugged out, but they were few enough to be legendary.

Yes, there were "drug abusers", and I knew some, but just about all of them have died of heart ailments, and at the time they weren't peace freaks, they were paranoid as hell.

It was drugs that did in the "flower children" - the influx of heavy druggies was dark and criminal and the "children" pulled back out of the line of fire.

Yes, I was there, at the peak, in the Fairfax (which was soon returned to the Jewish community), hob-knobing with the likes of Ronnie Cobb (once famous political cartoonist, later designer of Alien).

It was a very fun time, and I miss it lots, but I know a few pockets that remain, and I intend to return there from this computer crap - soon I hope.

[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New An original explanation! and maybe, pretty good :-\ufffd
Heh - got a couple decades on ya.. not that I believe my take on the local scene has any statistical validity, though I think I noticed the Berkeley and Bay area milieu pretty alertly..

As with your Moscow story - we're all creatures of the accidents of (WTF, it's a clear idea) 'peak experiences' - the ones that create permanent memory of the smells, sounds - virtually everything. So that night with the KGB and "actually helping a father!" must remain pretty vivid today (?).

Hardly comparable in adrenalin; by accident I met the Maharishi (Mahesh Yogi; also a physicist) in late '60s at lab. Being main honcho of the day, I got to stick next to him as we checked out our fancy machines. And actually looking him in the eyes from a couple feet away proved an 'odd' experience. I knew zippo about his gig, at the time (well - a few hints). But my impression became, after a half-hour of wandering about ~ "whatever this guy is, he isn't a phony.." (Meaning nothing re followers or their versions - then or later, of course). Anyway, that started for me an investigation of sorts, then other angles and self-experiments. Next throw in the RFK assassination (he Would have won) and...

So - we're such creatures. (Whenever someone tells me about their 'organizer' and how planned is their ascent up the corp. grey ladder to inanity yada yada - it is to laugh.) I deemed we were in for it when Nixon got back in power (after humiliation in CA gov. race in early '60s). I had a friend "hosed down" the city hall steps in SF - protesting a planned *HUAC "investigation" of local teachers, also early '60s. Began to actually pay attention to how Murican matters were manipulated ~ from those times.

* - We won! - chased the bastards outta town: that was the *last* scheduled HUAC witch hunt ever! Bill Mandel opening remarks, "Honorable beaters of children..". It was Glorious. This event began.. Murica's growth from political infancy. We almost reached adolescence.

Your explanation might be close - there were indeed some fine minds, undulled by the temptations to just play; there was dedication and a lot of it selfless - as we haven't seen around - til a week ago, IMhO. And there was lots of noise - a *rejection* of the dull, grey Eisenhower years, at last! And for some -- acid indeed opened minds; it wasn't meant for recreation, though always are the excessive around.

(A friend, Ian Underwood - went practically from a Mozart piano recital at Hertz Hall ---> to play with Frank Zappa! so I later got to meet the Mothers..) They were (I think all, then) prof. musicians - could transpose, play classical as well - and on a shrug from FZ, could do so in mid-selection. Not your kid players from a garage..

Accidents. Unexpected events. I'm grateful for some quite unMurican experiences - it isn't our style to question the daily 'reality' in this culture, or to turn off the noise.

I see today a hint of that 'danger + opportunity' of the RFK time; he was a rich kid who actually, finally Got it. We'll have to do with less, next. Might make it.. Believe we underestimate the brilliant few among us, via these stupid 'Xers' labels; here's a chance for some growing-up fast, to next occur.

Nostalgia ain't what it used to be,

A.
     Most Terrible Enemy. - (mmoffitt) - (23)
         Polarization - (gdaustin)
         The enemy of our enemy is not our friend. - (marlowe) - (9)
             The gravest mistake of the '60s peace movement . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
                 I came of age in the immediate aftermath of that. - (marlowe)
                 But we must all remember... - (mmoffitt)
                 Why just the sixties? - (Ashton) - (5)
                     It was all a lie, Ashton. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                         Exaggeration. - (Ashton) - (3)
                             I remain dubious. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                 Many were very serious - and some still are. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 An original explanation! and maybe, pretty good :-\ufffd - (Ashton)
         perhaps it worked - (tablizer) - (3)
             It Worked - (gdaustin)
             Time's Man of the Century. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 Remember our discussions - but I forget: Who finally got it? - (CRConrad)
         dont equate taliban and bin laden - (boxley) - (7)
             I am ignorant. - (mmoffitt)
             As soon as the Taliban hand over bin Laden... - (marlowe) - (5)
                 You've heard what the custom is re 'guests' - (Ashton) - (4)
                     A plausible scenario - (wharris2) - (3)
                         The don't-know-where-he-is dodge only works if we let it. - (marlowe) - (2)
                             Who cares where 'he' is - (Fearless Freep) - (1)
                                 Yes, 'Fundament-al' problem with such an obsession is: - (Ashton)

I am discretely counting the dark sides you have seen.
90 ms