Re: A peacenik debates a warmonger

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #94,155 by qstephens 4/3/03 6:09:19 PM Reply	Re: A peacenik debates a warmonger A blatantly biased piece. qts
Post #94,156 by Another Scott 4/3/03 6:10:19 PM Reply	That cannot be!!! ;-)
Post #94,211 by ben_tilly 4/3/03 9:23:15 PM Reply	And what did you expect? As I commented, it was either here or Oh Pun. Meaning that I thought of it as an attempt at a joke. One does not expect unbiased reporting in jokes... Cheers, Ben "good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not" - [link\|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html\|Stefano Mazzocchi]

A peacenik debates a warmonger - (ben_tilly) - (12) - April 2, 2003, 07:29:10 AM EST

That sums up my feelings about this well - (jake123) - April 2, 2003, 11:44:37 AM EST

How to get it into The Congressional Record... -NT - (Ashton) - April 2, 2003, 08:52:06 PM EST

Re: A peacenik debates a warmonger - (qstephens) - (2) - April 3, 2003, 06:09:19 PM EST

That cannot be!!! ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - April 3, 2003, 06:10:19 PM EST

And what did you expect? - (ben_tilly) - April 3, 2003, 09:23:15 PM EST

Sounds a lot like Marlowe vs Brandioch -NT - (jb4) - (6) - April 3, 2003, 06:35:07 PM EST

Am I on the good side or the evil side? -NT - (Brandioch) - (5) - April 3, 2003, 06:55:47 PM EST

Depends.. on which God one sacrifices one's sons & goats to: - (Ashton) - April 3, 2003, 09:45:19 PM EST

nah, you are on the weird side different category :) -NT - (boxley) - April 3, 2003, 11:36:02 PM EST

You're on the good side... - (jb4) - April 4, 2003, 10:15:11 AM EST

You're on the losing side. - (marlowe) - (1) - April 4, 2003, 05:20:11 PM EST

We'll see... -NT - (jb4) - April 4, 2003, 05:28:30 PM EST

This theory is not even wrong.
40 ms