IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / He HAD answered that, even BEFORE you asked!
Post #89,229
by CRConrad
3/18/03 5:43:10 PM
Reply
New He HAD answered that, even BEFORE you asked!
Some rabid Marlowe-type Screams:
Contextually, the assumption is that Iran had better get their tactical nukes into production by then (next presidential election) or ??? What fucking conclusion is obvious? "I hope". I asked him point blank why he "hoped" Iran would possess nuclear weapons before 2004. It's a decent question, I think.
He HAD ALREADY SAID, he hoped it *for their sake*. The Iranians, that is.

Because otherwise they'd be attacked by rabid American morons, *that* is the fucking conclusion that is obvious.

Fuck, some of you people are just totally out of your fucking minds, nowadays... I thought it was only Marlowe, of the ones I've seen here; thanks for correcting *that* misapprehension on my part.

Too bad the rabies seems to go directly to your brains, as evidenced by your inability to see that the answer you were looking for was already there -- otherwise, maybe some of you could have been cured, somehow.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
Post #89,295
by screamer
Picture of screamer
3/18/03 9:26:54 PM
Reply
New Avoiding the flames forum...
and trying to take the high ground, your point about my non-complete context is well taken.

As for the rest, I would like to cut out the usual flame road and ask you, a German native, why you find this Iraq conflict offensive, if you do. This is not a bait either. I'm genuinely interested in what the German/Scandinavian perspective is on this.

I think, all insults aside (put a target on my id), we have a lot of common ground. There just seems to be this notion that current American foreign policy is somehow "worse" than it was 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 years ago? I actually think that this administration is doing the right thing and believe their stated reasons. Does that make me "not smart"?

Fucking enlighten me, then insult me.
Just a few thoughts,

Screamer


Living is easy with eyes closed
misunderstanding all you see,
it's getting hard to be someone but it all works out
it doesn't matter much to me

J. Lennon - Strawberry Fields Forever
     interesting "Fresh Air" today - (rcareaga) - (32) - March 17, 2003, 10:30:35 PM EST
         Um... - (ben_tilly) - (31) - March 17, 2003, 10:38:50 PM EST
             Re: Um... - (rcareaga) - (29) - March 17, 2003, 10:46:53 PM EST
                 Very telling... - (screamer) - (28) - March 18, 2003, 09:55:41 AM EST
                     Your logic is wrong - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2003, 10:23:59 AM EST
                     Re: Very telling... - (rcareaga) - (26) - March 18, 2003, 10:33:49 AM EST
                         Carrying this a bit further... - (screamer) - (25) - March 18, 2003, 11:56:23 AM EST
                             you're assuming *way* too much - (rcareaga) - (13) - March 18, 2003, 01:25:40 PM EST
                                 Very fair assessment... - (screamer) - (3) - March 18, 2003, 03:57:36 PM EST
                                     Eschewing obfuscation, then_____ 'Democrats' indeed! - (Ashton) - (2) - March 18, 2003, 06:49:18 PM EST
                                         Mou droog, I respectfully disagree... - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 09:18:05 PM EST
                                             In simplest terms then - bringing this 'off' - (Ashton) - March 18, 2003, 11:57:16 PM EST
                                 Been down this slippery track with this person before - (dmarker) - (8) - March 18, 2003, 04:43:23 PM EST
                                     Add one more thing, Dougie... - (screamer) - (7) - March 18, 2003, 05:33:28 PM EST
                                         He HAD answered that, even BEFORE you asked! - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 05:43:10 PM EST
                                             Avoiding the flames forum... - (screamer) - March 18, 2003, 09:26:54 PM EST
                                         Re: Add one more thing, Dougie... - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 18, 2003, 08:26:03 PM EST
                                             he's not a "seasoned brawler" Thor God of Flaming thunder! -NT - (boxley) - March 18, 2003, 08:37:21 PM EST
                                             Let's start again then. - (screamer) - March 18, 2003, 09:31:31 PM EST
                                             P.S. Dimestore words like interlocutors... - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 09:46:04 PM EST
                                                 Well, when correctly spelled, then - - (Ashton) - March 20, 2003, 06:55:30 AM EST
                             Why the US won't attack countries with nukes - (ben_tilly) - (10) - March 18, 2003, 04:05:41 PM EST
                                 Re: Why the US won't attack countries with nukes - (deSitter) - (3) - March 18, 2003, 04:09:31 PM EST
                                     Conventional Western Wisdom holds... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 04:17:17 PM EST
                                         US current global strategy has China already contained ... - (dmarker) - March 18, 2003, 05:00:19 PM EST
                                     Digression -- Khrushchev - (rcareaga) - March 18, 2003, 05:26:03 PM EST
                                 Using same logic, what about bio/chem weapons? - (screamer) - (4) - March 18, 2003, 05:10:39 PM EST
                                     I'd dispute that getting bio/chem weapons are easier to get - (jake123) - March 18, 2003, 05:25:05 PM EST
                                     Bio/Chem won't have the same impact as nukes. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - March 18, 2003, 05:27:23 PM EST
                                         Basically agree with you and Jake except - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 05:40:40 PM EST
                                             Re: Basically agree with you and Jake except - (jake123) - March 18, 2003, 06:06:22 PM EST
                                 'Immanent' - a Jungian typo ? ;-) - (Ashton) - March 18, 2003, 06:06:07 PM EST
             There was a piece on BBC World Service a day or two ago - (jake123) - March 17, 2003, 10:48:13 PM EST

You just don't see sideburns like that anymore!
142 ms