IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Aye, that I am.
After I post a message (so far it's only been replies; I haven't had any top-level messages), my browser kinda hiccups and it looks like [link|http://www.mikevitale.com/images/iwt_error.png|this]. I searched [link|http://bugzilla.mozilla.org|http://bugzilla.mozilla.org] for "redirect" and it came back with 70 bugs filed. I wasn't about to search through all of 'em.

This is Moz 1.3 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314) on Red Hat 7.2. I downloaded and installed the RPMs from moz.org yesterday.
[mike@sixofone ~]$ rpm -qa | grep mozilla\nmozilla-nspr-1.3-0_rh7\nmozilla-psm-1.3-0_rh7\nmozilla-nss-1.3-0_rh7\nmozilla-1.3-0_rh7
-YendorMike

[link|http://www.hope-ride.org/|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
New Update: didn't happen when I posted that reply
...but for that one, I previewed it first, whereas for the others I hadn't. Hmmm. Interesting.
-YendorMike

[link|http://www.hope-ride.org/|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
New You might try 1.3b
I leapfrogged right past 1.3 and haven't had any problems.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New no you didn't
[link|http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html|http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html]

1.3a = alpha
1.3b = beta
1.3 = release

Darrell Spice, Jr.                      [link|http://www.spiceware.org/cgi-bin/spa.pl?album=./Artistic%20Overpass|Artistic Overpass]\n[link|http://www.spiceware.org/|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
New hmm, didn't notice that
When I tried to install Galeon it said it needed 1.3b, so that's what I installed. Guess I should go get 1.3 and upgrade again. Thanks for the heads up.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New confusing, eh?
I realized the numbering scheme last weekend when I downloaded the OS/2 release. I went to unzip it and noticed the last one I'd downloaded was the 1.3b version.

I don't see an "official version scheme" but it can be deduced by looking at the [link|http://www.mozilla.org/releases/|releases]. I see the sequence has been:
1.1a
1.1b
1.1
1.2a
1.2b
1.2
1.2.1
1.3a
1.3b
1.3

I'd prefer they used 1.1alpha, 1.1beta but suspect they were concerned about scaring off users. So now, instead of scaring them off. they just have confused users :-)
Darrell Spice, Jr.                      [link|http://www.spiceware.org/cgi-bin/spa.pl?album=./Artistic%20Overpass|Artistic Overpass]\n[link|http://www.spiceware.org/|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
     Mozilla 1.3 is available. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (21)
         At least one person is experiencing bugs here with 1.3 - (admin) - (19)
             I'm on 1.3b - (drewk)
             Aye, that I am. - (Yendor) - (5)
                 Update: didn't happen when I posted that reply - (Yendor)
                 You might try 1.3b - (drewk) - (3)
                     no you didn't - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                         hmm, didn't notice that - (drewk) - (1)
                             confusing, eh? - (SpiceWare)
             Problems with 1.3b - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                 Partial writing over other content - (admin)
                 Blank page with Moz 1.3 under OS/2 - (jake123)
                 Occasional blank white page on "back" on WinMe too. - (a6l6e6x)
             One change in rendering... - (scoenye) - (6)
                 Another one - (drewk) - (5)
                     mozilla_home is your friend - (jake123) - (4)
                         The problem with that... - (admin) - (3)
                             Heh, must be the IBM fetish - (jake123)
                             I always install fresh - then . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                 Same procedure here. -NT - (admin)
             I guess I am unique then... - (folkert)
         Interesting features - (orion)

Indigenous life must be in agreement.
204 ms