IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / There was a piece on BBC World Service a day or two ago
Post #88,961
by jake123
3/17/03 10:47:04 PM
3/17/03 10:48:13 PM
Reply
New There was a piece on BBC World Service a day or two ago
on this. They didn't seem to give it much credence.

... fixed subject line to say BBC instead of BBC
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Collapse Edited by jake123 March 17, 2003, 10:48:13 PM EST
There was a piece on BBB World Service a day or two ago
on this. They didn't seem to give it much credence.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *
* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *
* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Collapse All History
     interesting "Fresh Air" today - (rcareaga) - (32) - March 17, 2003, 10:30:35 PM EST
         Um... - (ben_tilly) - (31) - March 17, 2003, 10:38:50 PM EST
             Re: Um... - (rcareaga) - (29) - March 17, 2003, 10:46:53 PM EST
                 Very telling... - (screamer) - (28) - March 18, 2003, 09:55:41 AM EST
                     Your logic is wrong - (ben_tilly) - March 18, 2003, 10:23:59 AM EST
                     Re: Very telling... - (rcareaga) - (26) - March 18, 2003, 10:33:49 AM EST
                         Carrying this a bit further... - (screamer) - (25) - March 18, 2003, 11:56:23 AM EST
                             you're assuming *way* too much - (rcareaga) - (13) - March 18, 2003, 01:25:40 PM EST
                                 Very fair assessment... - (screamer) - (3) - March 18, 2003, 03:57:36 PM EST
                                     Eschewing obfuscation, then_____ 'Democrats' indeed! - (Ashton) - (2) - March 18, 2003, 06:49:18 PM EST
                                         Mou droog, I respectfully disagree... - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 09:18:05 PM EST
                                             In simplest terms then - bringing this 'off' - (Ashton) - March 18, 2003, 11:57:16 PM EST
                                 Been down this slippery track with this person before - (dmarker) - (8) - March 18, 2003, 04:43:23 PM EST
                                     Add one more thing, Dougie... - (screamer) - (7) - March 18, 2003, 05:33:28 PM EST
                                         He HAD answered that, even BEFORE you asked! - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 05:43:10 PM EST
                                             Avoiding the flames forum... - (screamer) - March 18, 2003, 09:26:54 PM EST
                                         Re: Add one more thing, Dougie... - (rcareaga) - (4) - March 18, 2003, 08:26:03 PM EST
                                             he's not a "seasoned brawler" Thor God of Flaming thunder! -NT - (boxley) - March 18, 2003, 08:37:21 PM EST
                                             Let's start again then. - (screamer) - March 18, 2003, 09:31:31 PM EST
                                             P.S. Dimestore words like interlocutors... - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 09:46:04 PM EST
                                                 Well, when correctly spelled, then - - (Ashton) - March 20, 2003, 06:55:30 AM EST
                             Why the US won't attack countries with nukes - (ben_tilly) - (10) - March 18, 2003, 04:05:41 PM EST
                                 Re: Why the US won't attack countries with nukes - (deSitter) - (3) - March 18, 2003, 04:09:31 PM EST
                                     Conventional Western Wisdom holds... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 04:17:17 PM EST
                                         US current global strategy has China already contained ... - (dmarker) - March 18, 2003, 05:00:19 PM EST
                                     Digression -- Khrushchev - (rcareaga) - March 18, 2003, 05:26:03 PM EST
                                 Using same logic, what about bio/chem weapons? - (screamer) - (4) - March 18, 2003, 05:10:39 PM EST
                                     I'd dispute that getting bio/chem weapons are easier to get - (jake123) - March 18, 2003, 05:25:05 PM EST
                                     Bio/Chem won't have the same impact as nukes. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - March 18, 2003, 05:27:23 PM EST
                                         Basically agree with you and Jake except - (screamer) - (1) - March 18, 2003, 05:40:40 PM EST
                                             Re: Basically agree with you and Jake except - (jake123) - March 18, 2003, 06:06:22 PM EST
                                 'Immanent' - a Jungian typo ? ;-) - (Ashton) - March 18, 2003, 06:06:07 PM EST
             There was a piece on BBC World Service a day or two ago - (jake123) - March 17, 2003, 10:48:13 PM EST

I never want to see that line out of context.
148 ms