What part of "propaganda" do you have trouble understanding?

Post #82,121 by Brandioch 2/16/03 9:01:53 PM Reply	What part of "propaganda" do you have trouble understanding?
Post #82,123 by boxley 2/16/03 9:09:05 PM Reply	what part of the post I made are you refering to? as for propaganda I understand yours just fine. I also disagree with it just fine. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,129 by Brandioch 2/16/03 9:29:44 PM Reply	Do you understand what "propaganda" is? what part of the post I made are you refering to? Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you reference polls in your post. You know, the polls of the population to see what their opinion is about a subject. Now, "propaganda" is feeding the public specific information and outright lies so they will have the opinion about a subject that you want them to have. You keep claiming to know that our government has lied to us.... Yet you keep swallowing every new lie that they release.
Post #82,147 by boxley 2/16/03 9:58:10 PM Reply	do you read my posts or just start typing like a maniac? I was complaining about the use of polls in the decision making process. Talking about taking a flying tangent to another topic that has nothing to do with the original post you then start claiming I believe what the polls represent and are positioned as. To be effective you have to pretend you read what you are responding to. You are leaving even that shred of coherence behind. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,233 by Brandioch 2/17/03 11:32:57 AM Reply	Item by item. ...you then start claiming I believe what the polls represent and are positioned as. You do. Talking about taking a flying tangent to another topic that has nothing to do with the original post... It is in direct relation to your original post. As I illustrated earlier. I was complaining about the use of polls in the decision making process. That's because you do not believe that you're swallowing their propaganda.
Post #82,241 by boxley 2/17/03 11:49:38 AM Reply	like someone else said around here you cant prove a negative thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,247 by Brandioch 2/17/03 12:05:33 PM Reply	But you can prove a positive. So, until someone bags a bigfoot or hooks the Lock Ness monster, I'm going to say they don't exist. And showing that our current regime is not stating the facts is easy.
Post #82,249 by boxley 2/17/03 12:14:04 PM Reply	What does bigfoot have to do with my wanted to get sadaam gone with 100 of his closest friends? You agreed with my post about canine predators and empire so you should agree that to remove an ankle biter is good pack policy. Wouldnt want to diagree with yourself again would you? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,282 by Brandioch 2/17/03 3:39:23 PM Reply	The question is "why"? What does bigfoot have to do with my wanted to get sadaam gone with 100 of his closest friends? Why do you want that? The "why" gets back to the propaganda. You want that because you've been fed propaganda that tells you how much of a threat Saddam is. That propaganda is based upon unproven allegations. But they strike an emotional chord within you. You respond emotionally, even when those allegations are later shown to be unfounded. "Iraq has NUKES!" "Iraq will have NUKES within SIX MONTHS!" "Saddam will use NUKES against the US homeland!" The fear remains within you even when there are no facts to support it. That is "propaganda".
Post #82,297 by boxley 2/17/03 5:19:17 PM Reply	May horsesh*t appear in your wheaties bowl you would probably think they were strawberries. If you read the post of mine that said Sadaam should have been removed in 1998 when he kicked the Inspectors out. It has nothing to do with oil, WMD or rockets. Those are YOUR excuses and causes not mine. thanx, Bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,318 by Brandioch 2/17/03 9:15:00 PM Reply	I believe the term is "whatever". If you read the post of mine that said Sadaam should have been removed in 1998 when he kicked the Inspectors out. It has nothing to do with oil, WMD or rockets. Those are YOUR excuses and causes not mine. Saddam did not kick them out. They were recalled because of other US operations. But, so what? You claim that it isn't because of "WMD's" or rockets. But that is what the inspectors were there to check on. If you don't care about whether Saddam has "WMD's" or rockets, then why are you so concerned about the inspectors? Like I said, emotional responses.
Post #82,124 by Ashton 2/16/03 9:09:45 PM Reply	Viscerally? (so much Gun-Fun, that) - All of it.

Welcome to IWETHEY!