IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Then why are we not invading Syria as well?
Post #80,722
by boxley
2/10/03 6:04:20 PM
Reply
New Then why are we not invading Syria as well?
e are still using the same old, we will ignore your despostism because it suits our short term needs. As far as the pro Israel position, Israel would be better served by invading Syria than Iraq
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #80,807
by Silverlock
2/10/03 10:52:20 PM
Reply
New Ask Bush^H^H^H^H Rumsfeld.
How many lives per gallon?
--Sign outside of various churches
     A different look at the "evidence". - (Brandioch) - (68) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:24:46 PM EST
         UN SCR 1441 says the burden's on Iraq. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:46:09 PM EST
             Let me clarify that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:51:07 PM EST
                 Thats only one aspect of many. - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:59:09 AM EST
         Clever bit of politics - (JayMehaffey) - (64) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:51:52 PM EST
             Re: Clever bit of politics - (dmarker) - (63) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:14:12 PM EST
                 Look at the parallels. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:41 AM EST
                 Misguided view - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:17:56 AM EST
                 Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (54) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:04:33 AM EST
                     Ohhh lawdy lawdy - where do we begin - (dmarker) - (50) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:39:36 AM EST
                         Start with trying to deny any of those statements. -NT - (bepatient) - (49) - Feb. 7, 2003, 07:24:36 AM EST
                             I'll start us off. - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:47:09 PM EST
                                 We've been through that too many times... - (bepatient) - (47) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:35:52 PM EST
                                     How do you do that? - (mmoffitt) - (46) - Feb. 7, 2003, 03:51:28 PM EST
                                         Occam - (bepatient) - (43) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:34:16 PM EST
                                             I chose to believe no one. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Feb. 9, 2003, 11:22:01 AM EST
                                                 No I don't. - (bepatient) - (41) - Feb. 9, 2003, 12:18:48 PM EST
                                                     Do you mangle everyone's statements, or just mine? - (mmoffitt) - (40) - Feb. 9, 2003, 03:53:41 PM EST
                                                         Mangle?? - (bepatient) - (36) - Feb. 9, 2003, 04:54:21 PM EST
                                                             "Reading for Comprehension" != "Conspiracy Theory" - (mmoffitt) - (35) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:14:33 AM EST
                                                                 Read the words. - (bepatient) - (33) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:38:25 AM EST
                                                                     We have no opinion on your dispute. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:42:09 AM EST
                                                                         Because... - (bepatient) - (23) - Feb. 10, 2003, 01:54:31 PM EST
                                                                             So, we're naive in addition to everything else. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:42:17 PM EST
                                                                                 Ambassadors are party contributors (you said Dolt) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:46:13 PM EST
                                                                                     Ah, but she was quoting "James Baker" then SoS. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:08:23 PM EST
                                                                                 Who is "we" - (bepatient) - (19) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:15:13 PM EST
                                                                                     "any suitable methods" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:20:05 PM EST
                                                                                         You can't read, can you. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:55 PM EST
                                                                                         James Baker issued instructions in the late 60's - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:51 PM EST
                                                                                             Glaspie checked w/Baker before the meeting-thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:52:14 PM EST
                                                                                     Addendum. - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:24:07 PM EST
                                                                                         Wow... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:42:48 PM EST
                                                                                             Ah.. the Pontius Pilate lateral arabesque - - (Ashton) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:19:43 PM EST
                                                                                                 Ah...so you thought that.. - (bepatient) - (11) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:27:39 PM EST
                                                                                                     Funny thing about our 'foresight'. Never mind '15 years' - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:52:43 PM EST
                                                                                                         Whatever you say. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:57:02 PM EST
                                                                                                         Then why are we not invading Syria as well? - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:04:20 PM EST
                                                                                                             Ask Bush^H^H^H^H Rumsfeld. -NT - (Silverlock) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:52:20 PM EST
                                                                                                         Obtuse still? *Pattern of behaviour* is the constant. -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:05:29 PM EST
                                                                                                             Yes you are still obtuse. -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:08:48 PM EST
                                                                                                                 Missed again: I'm scalene, - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:30:07 PM EST
                                                                                                                     No apparent need to do anything but repeat my previous post. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:48:12 PM EST
                                                                                                     I can't think of an exclamatory strong enough - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 09:51:51 PM EST
                                                                                                         It is borne out in history... - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:57:44 PM EST
                                                                                                             Boy, there's a euphemism for you. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:31:47 PM EST
                                                                     Oh, I see: the Market Will Correct. Right? -NT - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:57:28 PM EST
                                                                         What the???? possibly *babble* - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:10:47 PM EST
                                                                             It's the laissez-faire slogan, no? - (Ashton) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:32:05 PM EST
                                                                                 As was thought... - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:03 PM EST
                                                                                     Do you even wonder why? - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:08:30 PM EST
                                                                                         Wrong... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:43:22 PM EST
                                                                                             Well that explains it - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:54:28 PM EST
                                                                                                 "Displeased" is amorphus. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:33:28 PM EST
                                                                 A different take on AG's conversation with Saddam. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:56:30 PM EST
                                                         Ah, I see you've met "The Strawman". -NT - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 9, 2003, 05:22:01 PM EST
                                                             "The Strawman" - (orion) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:01:18 PM EST
                                                             From you? Thats funny. - (bepatient) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:19:07 PM EST
                                         Exactly. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:57:44 PM EST
                                             So now >you< believe this bunk? - (bepatient) - Feb. 8, 2003, 10:03:39 AM EST
                     Well.. yeah - missin-out on Justice an all - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 09:19:23 AM EST
                         He could....... - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:10:13 AM EST
                             Aren't you one of those... - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 11:46:36 AM EST
                 Here's some clever politics... - (screamer) - (5) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:24:02 AM EST
                     Well, let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST
                         Semi personal reply... - (screamer) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:01 PM EST
                             Nam was unprecedented. - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:58:14 PM EST
                     Got dizzy reading - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:19:45 PM EST
                         Exactly. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:51:09 PM EST

It’s the extra touches.
73 ms