He could.......

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #80,087

by Brandioch

2/7/03 10:10:13 AM

He could.......

Fire some bullets at Kuwait.

Where we have US troops who will come in and blow Baghdad apart.

Hmmmm, "suicide".

He could launch a rocket or 12 at Saudi Arabia.

Where we have US troops who will come in and blow Baghdad apart.

Hmmmm, "suicide".

He could launch some chemical rockets into Iran.

And the US troops in all the other countries would go in and blow Baghdad apart.

Hmmmm, "suicide".

!!!DAMMIT!!!

You do NOT understand.

We MUST kill their civilians so we can prevent these POSSIBLE attacks at some undetermined time in the FUTURE.

Every day we delay is a day closer to Saddam dieing of old age or a coup.

Ignore that last line.

Every day we delay is a day closer to Saddam commiting suicide by attacking a neighboring nation.

Ignore that last line.

Every day we delay is a day closer to.........

He's EVIL!
He's KILLED PEOPLE!
He's EVIL!
He invaded Kuwait!

We MUST invade!

Post #80,113

by bepatient

2/7/03 11:46:36 AM

Aren't you one of those...

...who has complained that one of our main problems in mid-east affairs is that our planning cycle is 4 years at a time.

Now you have a serious problem with that being changed.

This is the stance that this country and the UN should have been taking for the past 11 years.

It appears that because we did NOT take this stance...that everyone here thinks it more relevent that he didn't invade anyone >yesterday< and use that to pretend that Saddam is now harmless...we should leave him alone because he didn't kill anybody >today<.

Make up your mind.

You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson}

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]

A different look at the "evidence". - (Brandioch) - (68) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:24:46 PM EST

UN SCR 1441 says the burden's on Iraq. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:46:09 PM EST

Let me clarify that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:51:07 PM EST

Thats only one aspect of many. - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:59:09 AM EST

Clever bit of politics - (JayMehaffey) - (64) - Feb. 6, 2003, 10:51:52 PM EST

Re: Clever bit of politics - (dmarker) - (63) - Feb. 6, 2003, 11:14:12 PM EST

Look at the parallels. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:41 AM EST

Misguided view - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:17:56 AM EST

Excuse me? - (bepatient) - (54) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:04:33 AM EST

Ohhh lawdy lawdy - where do we begin - (dmarker) - (50) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:39:36 AM EST

Start with trying to deny any of those statements. -NT - (bepatient) - (49) - Feb. 7, 2003, 07:24:36 AM EST

I'll start us off. - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:47:09 PM EST

We've been through that too many times... - (bepatient) - (47) - Feb. 7, 2003, 02:35:52 PM EST

How do you do that? - (mmoffitt) - (46) - Feb. 7, 2003, 03:51:28 PM EST

Occam - (bepatient) - (43) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:34:16 PM EST

I chose to believe no one. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Feb. 9, 2003, 11:22:01 AM EST

No I don't. - (bepatient) - (41) - Feb. 9, 2003, 12:18:48 PM EST

Do you mangle everyone's statements, or just mine? - (mmoffitt) - (40) - Feb. 9, 2003, 03:53:41 PM EST

Mangle?? - (bepatient) - (36) - Feb. 9, 2003, 04:54:21 PM EST

"Reading for Comprehension" != "Conspiracy Theory" - (mmoffitt) - (35) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:14:33 AM EST

Read the words. - (bepatient) - (33) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:38:25 AM EST

We have no opinion on your dispute. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:42:09 AM EST

Because... - (bepatient) - (23) - Feb. 10, 2003, 01:54:31 PM EST

So, we're naive in addition to everything else. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:42:17 PM EST

Ambassadors are party contributors (you said Dolt) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 02:46:13 PM EST

Ah, but she was quoting "James Baker" then SoS. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:08:23 PM EST

Who is "we" - (bepatient) - (19) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:15:13 PM EST

"any suitable methods" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:20:05 PM EST

You can't read, can you. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:55 PM EST

James Baker issued instructions in the late 60's - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:51 PM EST

Glaspie checked w/Baker before the meeting-thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:52:14 PM EST

Addendum. - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:24:07 PM EST

Wow... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:42:48 PM EST

Ah.. the Pontius Pilate lateral arabesque - - (Ashton) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:19:43 PM EST

Ah...so you thought that.. - (bepatient) - (11) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:27:39 PM EST

Funny thing about our 'foresight'. Never mind '15 years' - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:52:43 PM EST

Whatever you say. - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:57:02 PM EST

Then why are we not invading Syria as well? - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:04:20 PM EST

Ask Bush^H^H^H^H Rumsfeld. -NT - (Silverlock) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:52:20 PM EST

Obtuse still? *Pattern of behaviour* is the constant. -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:05:29 PM EST

Yes you are still obtuse. -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:08:48 PM EST

Missed again: I'm scalene, - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:30:07 PM EST

No apparent need to do anything but repeat my previous post. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:48:12 PM EST

I can't think of an exclamatory strong enough - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 09:51:51 PM EST

It is borne out in history... - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:57:44 PM EST

Boy, there's a euphemism for you. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:31:47 PM EST

Oh, I see: the Market Will Correct. Right? -NT - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:57:28 PM EST

What the???? possibly *babble* - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:10:47 PM EST

It's the laissez-faire slogan, no? - (Ashton) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:32:05 PM EST

As was thought... - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:55:03 PM EST

Do you even wonder why? - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:08:30 PM EST

Wrong... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:43:22 PM EST

Well that explains it - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:54:28 PM EST

"Displeased" is amorphus. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2003, 07:33:28 PM EST

A different take on AG's conversation with Saddam. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:56:30 PM EST

Ah, I see you've met "The Strawman". -NT - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 9, 2003, 05:22:01 PM EST

"The Strawman" - (orion) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:01:18 PM EST

From you? Thats funny. - (bepatient) - Feb. 9, 2003, 06:19:07 PM EST

Exactly. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 04:57:44 PM EST

So now >you< believe this bunk? - (bepatient) - Feb. 8, 2003, 10:03:39 AM EST

Well.. yeah - missin-out on Justice an all - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 09:19:23 AM EST

He could....... - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:10:13 AM EST

Aren't you one of those... - (bepatient) - Feb. 7, 2003, 11:46:36 AM EST

Here's some clever politics... - (screamer) - (5) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:24:02 AM EST

Well, let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes - - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 7, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST

Semi personal reply... - (screamer) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:02:01 PM EST

Nam was unprecedented. - (Ashton) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:58:14 PM EST

Got dizzy reading - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:19:45 PM EST

Exactly. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 7, 2003, 12:51:09 PM EST

iwethey.org

Over 9000!
69 ms