IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New There's more in there
One of his major points is that education department programs seem designed to attract and promote scientific illiteracy if not outright fear and loathing of math and science in aspiring teachers.

Ramble: I once taught a math-for-ed-majors class at a university towards the end of my grad student days, and I remember feeling at the time that these were the worst math students I'd ever had. They were nice, pretty, attentive, and well-behaved, but they were also profoundly uncurious and unwilling to appreciate any actual math. There was no fun, no exploration, no "aha" moments -- and no expectation that there should be for "normal" people (folks like me who expected math to be fun and at least somewhat interesting in itself were clearly damaged in some way). It was upsetting to know that these people were actually going out of their way to "specialize" in math ed., and that their math anxiety attitude would be part of countless youngsters' introduction to math and science.

My own undergraduate school had no ed major -- to get a teaching certificate, you majored in a real subject like everyone else, and took a few ed courses and student teaching in addition to that (an ed minor if you will). Something like this is proposed in the article. Higher pay and respect are only in there to lure actual math and science majors into the teaching profession. The ed program at my alma mater was being shut down twenty years ago, presumably because too few students at the private university were interested in becoming secondary-school teachers.

Giovanni
New One more comment
Just a drop of cold water on the glimpse of promised land he offers at the end...
But imagine a world in which teaching in high school is such an attractive profession that it would be worth the trouble of a doctoral level education to get the job. For that to happen, we would have to pay teachers more, at least as much as what graduating doctoral students get. And they should be paid more.

But that's not the whole answer. Just as important, schools would have to learn to treat these teachers with professional respect, and society would have to afford them the honor and admiration that professionals expect. This is not unthinkable. Something like it was true in much of Europe before World War II. But it is very far from true in today's United States.
The situation in today's Europe may not be as bad as here in the US, but it is definitely no longer as rosy as he says it once was. Also, the high schools it was true for in pre-WWII Europe serviced the intellectual elite, not the working-class masses -- expectations of excellence and the ability to recognize it will be harder to come by these days.

Giovanni
     On the education paradox - (cforde) - (16)
         Summary... - (Yendor) - (15)
             #0: parents who care -NT - (tonytib)
             I've always thought - (imric) - (1)
                 Re: I've always thought - (screamer)
             Disagree... - (neelk) - (3)
                 Not quite so simple, IMO. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Your district looks very good.... - (neelk) - (1)
                         Fairfax is an anomaly in many ways. - (Another Scott)
             There's more in there - (GBert) - (1)
                 One more comment - (GBert)
             Paradox - (wharris2) - (4)
                 simple answer, public schools have to take everyone - (boxley) - (3)
                     or the converse... - (Fearless Freep) - (1)
                         very true -NT - (boxley)
                     Take away the public/private school question for a moment - (wharris2)
             Depends on the teachers. - (marlowe)

This is why I am in therapy.
60 ms