IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
React early - or watch attention span wane via next Warz ads
Post #63,443
by
Ashton
11/17/02 5:44:41 PM
Reply
React early - or watch attention span wane via next Warz ads
Pennsylvania passes "Pledge" bill
- (
Silverlock
)
- (61)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 03:36:23 PM EST
Makes me even prouder of my daughter.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 04:03:08 PM EST
Gotta say this
- (
Silverlock
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 04:56:19 AM EST
Now if that story could travel the grapevine
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 06:03:18 AM EST
Nail #666013 in the Coffin.
- (
Ashton
)
- (57)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 04:26:46 PM EST
And the previous administration?
- (
wharris2
)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 04:43:19 PM EST
What if they take the..
- (
bepatient
)
- (55)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 04:46:06 PM EST
Just out of curiosity: Would that do it for you?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (9)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 04:50:19 PM EST
I don't see another...
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:06:57 PM EST
The act of protesting
- (
imric
)
- (1)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:24:41 PM EST
I suppose that
- (
bepatient
)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:33:07 PM EST
I'd agree 'over-reaction' if..
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:35:55 PM EST
Over reaction?
- (
deSitter
)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 09:03:37 PM EST
I agree
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 04:24:03 AM EST
Sure.
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 08:22:14 AM EST
Possibly it is more significant now because of 'conditions'
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 03:23:49 PM EST
Never mind the constitution...
- (
CRConrad
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 07:00:57 PM EST
Here's my disagreement.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (42)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:11:12 PM EST
Precisamente, Thane
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 05:52:03 PM EST
Ditto and more.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (40)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 09:07:22 PM EST
Mere slothful thought + partisan Bible-thumping - I guess
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- (39)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 09:50:41 PM EST
I'd guess similar.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (38)
- Nov. 15, 2002, 10:53:58 PM EST
Both you and Ashton are reacting to the wrong thing
- (
Silverlock
)
- (4)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 04:52:46 AM EST
I don't think so.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (2)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 05:11:28 AM EST
Damn
- (
Silverlock
)
- (1)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 05:49:23 AM EST
My objection.
- (
Brandioch
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 05:31:10 PM EST
Oh,...the irony...
- (
jb4
)
- Nov. 20, 2002, 02:35:19 PM EST
A shameless barter..
- (
Ashton
)
- (32)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 05:47:40 AM EST
You got it.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (31)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 05:40:29 PM EST
Tell ya what I find rilly *discouraging* about this thread
- (
Ashton
)
- (30)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 08:21:44 PM EST
Ashton, are you arguing against automatic citizenship?
- (
wharris2
)
- (11)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 08:51:28 PM EST
Ah, the traditional response.
- (
Brandioch
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 09:23:21 PM EST
Believe in being as honest with my gov as they are with me\ufffd
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 09:44:13 PM EST
where in the hell do you pledge alegiance to "someone"?
- (
boxley
)
- (8)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 10:09:34 PM EST
What is the pledge?
- (
wharris2
)
- (7)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 07:23:57 AM EST
Sorry my constitution doesnt deport citizens
- (
boxley
)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 09:08:25 AM EST
Why thats simple...
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 03:07:06 PM EST
React early - or watch attention span wane via next Warz ads
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 05:44:41 PM EST
Re: Why thats simple...
- (
wharris2
)
- (3)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 06:51:00 PM EST
that was the Roman model
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 07:18:00 PM EST
Never had the option, here
- (
wharris2
)
- (1)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 08:37:25 PM EST
that is the problem with military service being a prereq
- (
boxley
)
- Nov. 17, 2002, 09:14:25 PM EST
Because those oaths have worked.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (17)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 09:07:59 PM EST
nit when did we ever breed for intelligence after slavery
- (
boxley
)
- (16)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 10:11:30 PM EST
Many years ago.
- (
Brandioch
)
- (15)
- Nov. 16, 2002, 11:41:10 PM EST
The link was broken way before that
- (
mhuber
)
- (14)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 11:53:16 AM EST
Even more basic -
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 03:54:10 PM EST
Evolution.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 04:03:57 PM EST
You can't be serious, can you?
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (4)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 04:37:12 PM EST
100% serious.
- (
mhuber
)
- (3)
- Nov. 26, 2002, 02:32:00 AM EST
In that huge span
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (2)
- Nov. 26, 2002, 11:12:14 AM EST
What advance in capabilities?
- (
mhuber
)
- (1)
- Nov. 26, 2002, 01:24:50 PM EST
You're mixing 2 discussions here...
- (
Arkadiy
)
- Nov. 26, 2002, 01:35:58 PM EST
Can't find a reference right now...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (6)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 10:23:57 PM EST
are you implying meateaters are smarter
- (
boxley
)
- (5)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 10:43:04 PM EST
Neither
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 10:48:24 PM EST
Gould questioned that
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (3)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 11:26:04 PM EST
If he wrote about it...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- Nov. 18, 2002, 11:45:07 PM EST
Overstated the case
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- Nov. 19, 2002, 09:54:33 PM EST
That fits my recollection as well :-)
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Nov. 19, 2002, 11:11:52 PM EST
Basically, No
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- Nov. 20, 2002, 02:27:22 PM EST
Yes - free speech is also the right to remain silent.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Nov. 20, 2002, 05:04:53 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Powered by a bowl of Giorgio's Fettucini Primavera and two rabid Viking weasels!
248 ms