IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Ashton, are you arguing against automatic citizenship?
If someone isn't willing to pledge allegiance to the United States of America, then renounce the citizenship and be done with it.

Oh, yeah, children can't do that.

(Amidst other minor obstructing details such as when you pledge allegiance to someone they owe in return certain responsibilities and duties... like following the constitution...)
New Ah, the traditional response.
If you don't support something I support, then you can just leave the country.

Fascinating.

And yet it reveals a complete lack of historical knowledge.

Since Senator McCarthy was willing to swear many loyalty oaths, would the nation have been better off with him or without him?

Also, please note, that this position does not IN ANY WAY specify what this law is supposed to PROTECT or PREVENT.

Strangely enough, I am not in the least bit surprised at this oversite. Nor do I expect that the omission will be rectified in the future.

Rather than explaining WHY this law is needed, detail how the people who do not support it are "unpatriotic".

Rather than specifying what this law is supposed to prevent/protect, demand that anyone who doesn't support it renounce their citizenship.

Because that is the SOLE reason for this law.

To identify those who are REAL patriots from those OTHER people.

Dude, why don't you leave the US to us REAL patriots and take your wannabe Reich ass over to Iraq where they think that indoctrinating children is a GOOD idea.
New Believe in being as honest with my gov as they are with me\ufffd
New where in the hell do you pledge alegiance to "someone"?
that is something the monarchists might instigate but we got rid of that shit in the 1700s
I have oathed allegiance to the constitution, everyone else can go fuck themselves with the flag if they wish.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
"Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
New What is the pledge?
You pledge allegiance to the flag and to what it stands for. Liberty and justice for all.

Perhaps not to a person, but the idea is the same. It doesn't say "I pledge allegiance to the constitution" but it comes close.

If you are a citizen in this country, live here, work here, play here, and aren't willing to pledge your allegiance to it, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
New Sorry my constitution doesnt deport citizens
for not taking a loyalty oath. That sounds somewhat Islamic to me. Mindless adherence to form over substance. What country do you live in anyway?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
"Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
New Why thats simple...
...it was designed by Hitler to indoctinate all young minds and develop them into good little soldiers to fight for the cause.

[image|/forums/images/warning.png|0|This is sarcasm...]

Why...the very essence of allegiance precludes freedom, yes? How about the Y Smirnov pledge instead...everyone get up at the beginning of class and say "What a country"...then sit.

-----

Before we all get too wrapped up in this (again)...lets see if it actually makes it passed judicial review (where all of the other attempts have failed)...if it does...then lets all cry about the new Nazi party in PA.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New React early - or watch attention span wane via next Warz ads
New Re: Why thats simple...
Yeah, the pledge will turn all those impressionable minds who haven't been turned into mush by PC, bad teachers, bad teaching techniques, and so forth... into mush.

I'm beginning to like the Starship Troopers citizen model a lot more than I used to.
New that was the Roman model
a citizen was called into the legions and stayed there until the age of forty. How is your manual of arms drill?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
"Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
New Never had the option, here
I might have considered serving in the army, only they would have invalidated me because of my scoliosis. Basic training in a back brace, heh.
New that is the problem with military service being a prereq
for citizenship. There is more than one way to serve your country and you with your skills are valuable here.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
"Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
     Pennsylvania passes "Pledge" bill - (Silverlock) - (61)
         Makes me even prouder of my daughter. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
             Gotta say this - (Silverlock)
             Now if that story could travel the grapevine - (Ashton)
         Nail #666013 in the Coffin. - (Ashton) - (57)
             And the previous administration? - (wharris2)
             What if they take the.. - (bepatient) - (55)
                 Just out of curiosity: Would that do it for you? -NT - (CRConrad) - (9)
                     I don't see another... - (bepatient) - (8)
                         The act of protesting - (imric) - (1)
                             I suppose that - (bepatient)
                         I'd agree 'over-reaction' if.. - (Ashton)
                         Over reaction? - (deSitter)
                         I agree - (Silverlock) - (2)
                             Sure. - (bepatient) - (1)
                                 Possibly it is more significant now because of 'conditions' - (Ashton)
                         Never mind the constitution... - (CRConrad)
                 Here's my disagreement. - (inthane-chan) - (42)
                     Precisamente, Thane - (Ashton)
                     Ditto and more. - (Brandioch) - (40)
                         Mere slothful thought + partisan Bible-thumping - I guess -NT - (Ashton) - (39)
                             I'd guess similar. - (Brandioch) - (38)
                                 Both you and Ashton are reacting to the wrong thing - (Silverlock) - (4)
                                     I don't think so. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                         Damn - (Silverlock) - (1)
                                             My objection. - (Brandioch)
                                     Oh,...the irony... - (jb4)
                                 A shameless barter.. - (Ashton) - (32)
                                     You got it. - (Brandioch) - (31)
                                         Tell ya what I find rilly *discouraging* about this thread - (Ashton) - (30)
                                             Ashton, are you arguing against automatic citizenship? - (wharris2) - (11)
                                                 Ah, the traditional response. - (Brandioch)
                                                 Believe in being as honest with my gov as they are with me\ufffd -NT - (Ashton)
                                                 where in the hell do you pledge alegiance to "someone"? - (boxley) - (8)
                                                     What is the pledge? - (wharris2) - (7)
                                                         Sorry my constitution doesnt deport citizens - (boxley)
                                                         Why thats simple... - (bepatient) - (5)
                                                             React early - or watch attention span wane via next Warz ads -NT - (Ashton)
                                                             Re: Why thats simple... - (wharris2) - (3)
                                                                 that was the Roman model - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                     Never had the option, here - (wharris2) - (1)
                                                                         that is the problem with military service being a prereq - (boxley)
                                             Because those oaths have worked. - (Brandioch) - (17)
                                                 nit when did we ever breed for intelligence after slavery - (boxley) - (16)
                                                     Many years ago. - (Brandioch) - (15)
                                                         The link was broken way before that - (mhuber) - (14)
                                                             Even more basic - - (Ashton)
                                                             Evolution. - (Another Scott)
                                                             You can't be serious, can you? - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                                                                 100% serious. - (mhuber) - (3)
                                                                     In that huge span - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                                                                         What advance in capabilities? - (mhuber) - (1)
                                                                             You're mixing 2 discussions here... - (Arkadiy)
                                                             Can't find a reference right now... - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                                                                 are you implying meateaters are smarter - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                     Neither - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                                                         Gould questioned that - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
                                                                             If he wrote about it... - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                                 Overstated the case - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                                                                                     That fits my recollection as well :-) -NT - (ben_tilly)
                 Basically, No - (jb4) - (1)
                     Yes - free speech is also the right to remain silent. -NT - (Ashton)

I have neither space nor cash nor latitude to adorn my house with any more things with CPUs in them.
296 ms