IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Hee hee hee.
Can you understand what a "date/time stamp" is?

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=55794|WTF? Here are the PHOTOGRAPHS!]

In some places on the border, there were walls, along most of it, only fences and guard towers.
Or do you think that I am incapable of recalling my own statements?

And that post FROM ME was to refute THIS statement made by Screamer:
Dude, did you ever leave Berlin? I was on border sites (THE FUCKING WALL) nowhere near Berlin... It ran the entire length of the country.
So, you've managed to prove what, exactly?

That I was CORRECT on 2002-10-09 19:09:36 when I stated that there were walls in places along the border BUT that there wasn't a wall along the border?

Yes, check out my post and the date time stamp.

Then click on the PHOTOGRAPHS I've provided.

You should be @%#$ing ashamed of yourself. And you know what I'm talking about.
Actually, I don't know what you're talking about. I SUSPECT that you might be under the impression that you've just "proven" that there WAS a wall (wall, not fence, not "barrier", wall) running along the border.

What I KNOW is that you will immediately attempt to sidestep the FACT that I CLEARLY stated that there were walls (walls, with bricks and mortar, walls) on the border.

And I am the one that should be ashamed? For posting the information you've just managed to dredge up 2 weeks ago?

I'm sorry, but I just don't quite understand that concept.
New So.......
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=55523|Link]
When screamer says
"Hey, they even built a wall to keep Germany divided... or did you forget that too?"

He is absolutely, undeniably correct.
And you were wrong (and illogical) to challenge that because there is absolutely
NOTHING wrong with the statement.

You jumped to the conclusion that the "wall" was in Berlin
and then realised your own mistake.
Your retrenching after the fact does not impress.

I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
New Heee heee heeeee.
When screamer says
"Hey, they even built a wall to keep Germany divided... or did you forget that too?"

He is absolutely, undeniably correct.
And you were wrong (and illogical) to challenge that because there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with the statement.
Nice try, but, as I've already demonstrated, my memory is far superior to your's.

And I do not have to hunt for "quotes" out of context. Since I've JUST POSTED this IN THE PREVIOUS POST, but you've SOMEHOW managed to miss it, I'll post it again.

Dude, did you ever leave Berlin? I was on border sites (THE FUCKING WALL) nowhere near Berlin... It ran the entire length of the country.
No. There was not a wall running the entire length of the country.

Thanks for making my point.

#1. You were not there, then.

#2. You did not SEE the border.

#3. You only saw some pictures and heard about it.

#4. You BELIEVED that the was a wall RUNNING THE LENGTH OF THE COUNTRY.

Again, anyone who was actually there would KNOW that there wasn't a wall along the length of the country because they would have SEEN the border.

Therefore, anyone who BELIEVED there was a wall running the length of the border WAS NOT AT THE BORDER.

Just as you've demonstrated.
New Here it is, a THIRD time!
Dude, did you ever leave Berlin? I was on border sites (THE FUCKING WALL) nowhere near Berlin... It ran the entire length of the country.
No. There was not a wall running the entire length of the country.
New Just in case you missed 1-3, here it is a 4th time.
Dude, did you ever leave Berlin? I was on border sites (THE FUCKING WALL) nowhere near Berlin... It ran the entire length of the country.
No. There was not a wall running the entire length of the country.
New Whatsamatta? No comment?
New Hee hee hee
Screamer made that statement after you made your blunder
(this is that strange context concept again)
I'm not saying he didn't make a mistake. I'm saying you did.
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
New What "blunder" was that?
Hmmmmm?
New *fap* *fap*
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
New Again, I will understand *fap* to mean...
that you are unable to counter my position and unwilling to admit the flaws in your position.

It was a simple request for you to clarify a word in your statement.
New *fap* *fap* *fap*
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
     To Brandioch - (Mike) - (44)
         Hee hee hee. - (Brandioch) - (10)
             So....... - (Mike) - (9)
                 Heee heee heeeee. - (Brandioch)
                 Here it is, a THIRD time! - (Brandioch)
                 Just in case you missed 1-3, here it is a 4th time. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                     Whatsamatta? No comment? -NT - (Brandioch) - (5)
                         Hee hee hee - (Mike) - (4)
                             What "blunder" was that? - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                 *fap* *fap* -NT - (Mike) - (2)
                                     Again, I will understand *fap* to mean... - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                         *fap* *fap* *fap* -NT - (Mike)
         Anecdote - (wharris2) - (32)
             Could it have been a barrier? :-) -NT - (bepatient) - (30)
                 Re: Could it have been a barrier? :-) - (wharris2) - (29)
                     So nice to see a 4th stooge. - (Brandioch) - (28)
                         No humor left on your planet? -NT - (bepatient) - (27)
                             Sorry, I outgrew Stooge humour. -NT - (Brandioch) - (26)
                                 Ah...fair enough. - (bepatient) - (25)
                                     Reading just isn't your forte, is it? - (Brandioch) - (24)
                                         I see that parent and child threading isn't yours. - (bepatient) - (23)
                                             I guess you have to be right eventually. - (Brandioch) - (22)
                                                 So you are claiming to be wharris2? - (bepatient) - (21)
                                                     Re: Could it have been a barrier? :-) - (Brandioch) - (20)
                                                         .o0o. -NT - (bepatient) - (19)
                                                             et tu? - (screamer) - (18)
                                                                 You want an apology? - (Brandioch) - (16)
                                                                     -----oooo0000oooo----- -NT - (screamer) - (15)
                                                                         What IS this ^^^ -NT - (deSitter) - (14)
                                                                             It's a "horizontal line" that was used by - (screamer) - (7)
                                                                                 You still can't keep it straight. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                                                                     A quick P.S.: - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                                                                         Look, I know after many years... - (screamer) - (2)
                                                                                             A cease fire. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                                                                                 A cease fire - (screamer)
                                                                                 Er umm - not Quite so simple a dismissal please - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                                     Fair, sort of... - (screamer)
                                                                             Why it's - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                                 Re: Why it's - (wharris2) - (1)
                                                                                     One person's babble is another's Enlightenment____Ommmmm -NT - (Ashton)
                                                                             Re: What IS this ^^^ - (deSitter) - (2)
                                                                                 WTF I replied to myself -NT - (deSitter)
                                                                                 No Idea.. what it was supposed to 'mean'.. doodling? -NT - (Ashton)
                                                                 Rofl... - (bepatient)
             Nice Run ^^^^ -NT - (deSitter)

Note for the linguistically-impaired: That was a rhetorical question. (Second note, for the vocabulary-challenged: That means you're not supposed to answer it.)
108 ms