between the bottom-line effects of greedy union slugs VS the total compensation packages of management, from CIEIO on through that vagueness, middle-management?

Apples and apples, say? Leaving aside, that is - the insoluble argument about Which Group is Greedier\ufffd - in a system whose very basis is the maximizing of personal greed / at the expense of all and anyone not-me (I believe that's a sane deconstruction of the core 'incentive' rationale for amassing capital)).

(Econ is such number-fun; it's so bloodless, and each tenet generates a family of logical obfuscations - leading to the next; sorta like that other pseudo-science, The Law ?)


Ashton

Looking for Nobel material next: The Chaos Theory of Econ, Explained