Post #440,830
2/4/22 5:30:22 PM
2/4/22 5:30:22 PM
|

Keeping a hand in: “Non-Newtonian Economics”
I may have mentioned before that I (perhaps foolishly) volunteered some months back to take the 1948 manuscript of a friend’s father into print, using the same online service that produced Cinema Paronomasia, which in the five months since its production has already sold two copies at retail (thanks, guys!). Anyway, I took the 300 pages of typescript, deposited on onionskin paper via a ribbon that ought to have been discarded by the end of the war, and rendered these, via a tedious and labor-intensive series of procedures, into machine-readable form. Following much massaging, and some contentious exchanges with the author’s son, I am closing on the final product. Presently I’m making a last page-by-page review with a mind to extirpating such errors and omissions as have survived the past several carpet bombings, and also to correct any subtle formatting inconsistencies such as would elude the eye of the lay reader—there will be few of these—but not the close scrutiny of a trained publishing professional, of whom there will be none. The finished product will likely have a print run of a dozen, mainly to the heirs of its author (1922-1956), but I feel rather good about bringing the young man’s work into the present century. I think he would be pleased with the printed product, and I’ve enjoyed exercising my design chops to this end. Preliminary cover treatment here. cordially,
|
Post #440,831
2/4/22 5:36:27 PM
2/4/22 5:36:27 PM
|

hmm let me know when it is ready I might want to get one
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,833
2/4/22 5:43:14 PM
2/4/22 5:43:14 PM
|

Just so you know…
the profit above printing cost will not go to me, the hardworking editor and designer, but to the late author’s millionaire scion—who, I will add, is a stand-up guy.
|
Post #440,835
2/4/22 9:35:16 PM
2/4/22 9:35:16 PM
|

no issue the subject matter looks interesting to me
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,860
2/10/22 4:52:34 PM
2/10/22 4:52:34 PM
|

No need for you to purchase
The formatted text can be found here. Keep in mind that this was written by an adjunct professor, then twenty-five, near the end of Truman’s first term. cordially,
|
Post #440,866
2/11/22 9:38:32 AM
2/11/22 9:38:32 AM
|

thanks!
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,867
2/11/22 10:11:04 AM
2/11/22 10:11:04 AM
|

Which gives you an opportunity ...
You can compare his analysis to how things have actually gone over the last 60 years. The better it aligns, the more likely he found something useful.
|
Post #440,879
2/12/22 5:09:35 PM
2/12/22 5:09:35 PM
|

very interesting and informative except for his misunderstanding of the purpose of corporations
It may in fact be the difference in the law then and now. a corporation is a shield for shareholders from individual responsibilities of corporate debt. One set of investors holding off subordinate sets of investors.
He doesnt really offer any concrete solutions but does define very well how money flow moves and why
well edited
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,881
2/12/22 9:13:56 PM
2/12/22 9:13:56 PM
|

Is it primarily shielding from financial liability or criminal?
|
Post #440,885
2/13/22 6:29:05 PM
2/13/22 6:29:05 PM
|

primary is financial, criminal pierces the corporate shield and makes shareholders liable for both
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,886
2/13/22 8:39:11 PM
2/13/22 8:39:11 PM
|

Tell that to the citizens of Bhopal
|
Post #440,857
2/10/22 3:26:16 AM
2/10/22 3:26:16 AM
|

Stuff on the back cover that strikes the eye of the lay reader:
- Close-quarters repetition of the phrase "real-world consequences".
- Author portrait is "looking out of the picture". Mirror-flip pic, or move it to the other side?
--
Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking EverythingMail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
|
Post #440,859
2/10/22 1:45:40 PM
2/10/22 1:45:40 PM
|

Re: Stuff on the back cover that strikes the eye of the lay reader:
Yeah, I revised the copy, including that repetition, before it finally went to press on Monday. The author is looking out of the picture, to be sure, but the other side is reserved for the ISBN barcode, and I wouldn’t have wanted for the poor man to “turn over in his grave.”
There is one formatting inconsistency mid-book that the lay reader—not that there will ever be many of these—will never register. I could have fixed it at the cost of much manual repagination, which at that point, four months in, I didn’t feel much like undertaking.
cordially,
|
Post #440,868
2/11/22 10:32:04 AM
2/11/22 10:32:04 AM
|

he can turn a phrase all right
This is the case because the work of scientists “obviously” is amoral, without meaning in terms of the ethical and political issues of the day. “Consider the Census Bureau facts and generalizations regarding trends in our population, labor force, and income. Are these conclusions Communist, Capitalist, or Fascist? The question makes no more sense than to ask whether the law of gravity is Catholic, Protestant, or Pagan.”
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
|
Post #440,918
2/16/22 11:51:31 PM
2/16/22 11:51:31 PM
|

The law of gravity is certainly Pagan
|