You were asked to name the individuals.
You named the companies.
The companies and their associated activities were already covered in the original article. The evidence seems to be that the companies are NOT "liberal" in outlook.
Now, you're still refusing to name the individuals who you claim have a "liberal" bias.
But you're still claiming that there is one in the media.
You just won't name who they are.
Just that they work for decidedly non-liberal companies.
And this passes for "logic" where you come from?