Is that vaguely reminiscient of "separate but equal"?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #43,674

6/27/02 3:17:57 PM

Is that vaguely reminiscient of "separate but equal"?

"Rehnquist moving away from the Burger Court's view:
From 'strict separation' ---> [something imagined as] 'neutrality'."

Can they be "neutral" without being "strictly separate"?

Again, a simple proof would be whether we could get "One nation, under Allah" passed as a suitable replacement for "One nation, under God".

It's "neutral" and nothing to worry about WHEN IT IS YOUR GOD who is given preeminence.

Them's fightin' words when it the OTHER GUY'S blasphemous misrepresentation is given preeminence and the TRUE GOD isn't even mentioned.

('specially when we happen to be at war with them heathens)

It isn't that we be favourin' one side nor that we be SAYIN' that one side be "better". We be "neutral" and they be "equal" to us.

Post #43,836

6/28/02 5:35:08 PM

"I plagiarize egregiousness to the flagging of the

Republic for which it stood.. til it didn't."

or

I placate legions with the swag and for the Republicans which stand to collect it, with liberty and justice for ~~all~~ [3-5% give or mostly, take].

Federal judge: Pledge of Allegiance violates US Constitution - (bbronson) - (43) - June 26, 2002, 03:47:07 PM EDT

Yes, I recall when that phrase was added. - (Ashton) - (25) - June 26, 2002, 04:22:58 PM EDT

Dammit! - (Brandioch) - (24) - June 26, 2002, 04:53:07 PM EDT

Well...we'll just have to.. - (bepatient) - (20) - June 26, 2002, 06:27:24 PM EDT

Ah, once again, you missed the point. - (Brandioch) - (17) - June 26, 2002, 07:02:42 PM EDT

Nope...you missed mine. - (bepatient) - (16) - June 26, 2002, 08:19:18 PM EDT

Maybe I was reading that incorrectly. - (Brandioch) - (15) - June 26, 2002, 08:27:56 PM EDT

Wow.... - (bepatient) - (14) - June 26, 2002, 10:32:51 PM EDT

Let me simplify this for you. - (Brandioch) - (13) - June 26, 2002, 11:43:07 PM EDT

My my - (bepatient) - (12) - June 27, 2002, 07:13:59 AM EDT

I'll address this in two parts. - (Brandioch) - (11) - June 27, 2002, 10:51:13 AM EDT

*cackle* - (bepatient) - (3) - June 27, 2002, 11:13:10 AM EDT

I'll use really small words for you. - (Brandioch) - June 27, 2002, 12:37:33 PM EDT

Now, for everyone who doesn't understand what "strawman" is. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 12:45:16 PM EDT

>2< Posts this time...way cool! - (bepatient) - June 27, 2002, 12:59:46 PM EDT

More than retooling quarters - (rsf) - (5) - June 27, 2002, 12:58:14 PM EDT

Ah... - (bepatient) - June 27, 2002, 01:02:06 PM EDT

Depends upon the ruling. - (Brandioch) - (3) - June 27, 2002, 01:54:54 PM EDT

Even better... - (bepatient) - June 27, 2002, 02:22:30 PM EDT

Re: Depends upon the ruling. - (rsf) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 03:30:47 PM EDT

But that's the issue. - (Brandioch) - June 27, 2002, 05:01:35 PM EDT

More than retooling quarters - (rsf) - June 27, 2002, 12:59:05 PM EDT

In Dog We Strut - (deSitter) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 11:45:31 AM EDT

Heh... - (bepatient) - June 27, 2002, 02:19:08 PM EDT

While you are at it ... - (bluke) - (2) - June 27, 2002, 06:17:07 AM EDT

I guess reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 08:54:06 AM EDT

I just think that the pundits... - (Simon_Jester) - June 27, 2002, 04:35:20 PM EDT

Senate immediately proves that dumb is cool. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 26, 2002, 08:40:32 PM EDT

uhhh... - (jb4) - June 26, 2002, 09:27:45 PM EDT

Blatantly stolen from CNN - (Brandioch) - June 26, 2002, 08:43:13 PM EDT

Congress fulminates: stands outside and recites. - (Ashton) - (5) - June 27, 2002, 03:30:03 AM EDT

User Friendly. Get it fast. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 04:46:26 AM EDT

I'll genuflect to that! -NT - (Ashton) - June 27, 2002, 05:41:47 AM EDT

Of course you meant "One Nation under Rah!". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - June 27, 2002, 08:44:46 PM EDT

I pledge allegiance - (Yendor) - (1) - June 28, 2002, 10:11:21 AM EDT

Where do I sign up ;-) -NT - (bepatient) - June 28, 2002, 10:20:00 AM EDT

I love Bill Mahr's take last night - (drewk) - June 27, 2002, 09:29:17 AM EDT

Okay, this is a tangent, but I think it's applicable. - (Brandioch) - (3) - June 27, 2002, 02:00:16 PM EDT

But I thought you were an atheist? -NT - (imric) - (2) - June 27, 2002, 02:23:22 PM EDT

I'm going for effect. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 03:23:11 PM EDT

For Effect... - (Simon_Jester) - June 27, 2002, 04:38:41 PM EDT

On NPR now: discussion, debate, fulminations - (Ashton) - (2) - June 27, 2002, 02:20:30 PM EDT

Is that vaguely reminiscient of "separate but equal"? - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 27, 2002, 03:17:57 PM EDT

"I plagiarize egregiousness to the flagging of the - (Ashton) - June 28, 2002, 05:35:08 PM EDT

Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
57 ms