IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Okay, this is a tangent, but I think it's applicable.
[link|http://home.earthlink.net/~paganmade/|One nation, under God.]

I'm thinking of getting a couple.
New But I thought you were an atheist?

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
New I'm going for effect.
In other areas, a Star of David in the same Stars & Stripes pattern would be as effective.

And a bill to replace "One nation, under God" with "One nation, under Yahweh".

Actually, since it says "God" and not "Christ", "Yahweh" SHOULD be a perfectly acceptable replacement.

:)



(yes, I know. Allah and Yahweh and God are all the same....whatever. It's the "prophets" and "sons" and so on that distinguish them (dramatically over-simplified)).
New For Effect...
Allah is better.... much better.
     Federal judge: Pledge of Allegiance violates US Constitution - (bbronson) - (43)
         Yes, I recall when that phrase was added. - (Ashton) - (25)
             Dammit! - (Brandioch) - (24)
                 Well...we'll just have to.. - (bepatient) - (20)
                     Ah, once again, you missed the point. - (Brandioch) - (17)
                         Nope...you missed mine. - (bepatient) - (16)
                             Maybe I was reading that incorrectly. - (Brandioch) - (15)
                                 Wow.... - (bepatient) - (14)
                                     Let me simplify this for you. - (Brandioch) - (13)
                                         My my - (bepatient) - (12)
                                             I'll address this in two parts. - (Brandioch) - (11)
                                                 *cackle* - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                     I'll use really small words for you. - (Brandioch)
                                                     Now, for everyone who doesn't understand what "strawman" is. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                                         >2< Posts this time...way cool! - (bepatient)
                                                 More than retooling quarters - (rsf) - (5)
                                                     Ah... - (bepatient)
                                                     Depends upon the ruling. - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                                         Even better... - (bepatient)
                                                         Re: Depends upon the ruling. - (rsf) - (1)
                                                             But that's the issue. - (Brandioch)
                                                 More than retooling quarters - (rsf)
                     In Dog We Strut - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Heh... - (bepatient)
                 While you are at it ... - (bluke) - (2)
                     I guess reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (1)
                         I just think that the pundits... - (Simon_Jester)
         Senate immediately proves that dumb is cool. - (Brandioch) - (1)
             uhhh... - (jb4)
         Blatantly stolen from CNN - (Brandioch)
         Congress fulminates: stands outside and recites. - (Ashton) - (5)
             User Friendly. Get it fast. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                 I'll genuflect to that! -NT - (Ashton)
             Of course you meant "One Nation under Rah!". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                 I pledge allegiance - (Yendor) - (1)
                     Where do I sign up ;-) -NT - (bepatient)
         I love Bill Mahr's take last night - (drewk)
         Okay, this is a tangent, but I think it's applicable. - (Brandioch) - (3)
             But I thought you were an atheist? -NT - (imric) - (2)
                 I'm going for effect. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                     For Effect... - (Simon_Jester)
         On NPR now: discussion, debate, fulminations - (Ashton) - (2)
             Is that vaguely reminiscient of "separate but equal"? - (Brandioch) - (1)
                 "I plagiarize egregiousness to the flagging of the - (Ashton)

You're typing on a device that stores trillions of pieces of data and makes billions of computations per second with the ability to grab data on almost anything from around the world in milliseconds, using electricity transmitted from hundreds of kilometers through wires on towers dozens of meters tall connected to megastructures that do things like burn coal as fast as entire trains can pull into the yard, or spin in the wind with blades the size of jumbo jets, or the like, which were delivered to their location by vehicles with computer-timed engines burning a fuel that was pumped up halfway around the world from up to half a dozen kilometers underground and locked into complex strata (through wells drilled by diamond-lined bores that can be remote-control steered as they go), shipped around the world in tankers with volumes the size of large city blocks and the height of apartment complexes, run through complex chemical processes in unimaginable quantities, distributed nationwide and sold to you at a corner store for $1.80 a gallon, which you then pay for with a little piece of microchipped plastic, if not a smartphone, which does all of the aforementioned computer stuff but in a box the size of your hand that tolerates getting beaten up in your pocket all day.

But technology never seems to advance...


55 ms