IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New *cackle*
So he has success and your guess is he'll just quit.

Nah...doubt it...he's too afraid of the big bad wolf.

You certainly can take a relatively light comment and turn it into a chore, can't you?

Later.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New I'll use really small words for you.
So he has success and your guess is he'll just quit.
He is not the government. (Damn. I had to use a polysyllabic word there. I've probably lost you.)

He is not the court.

He is not the President.

He is not the House or Senate.

What he wants does not matter.

He must take his case to the court.

The judge must rule that he is right.

Then that ruling can be appealed. (damn. "appealed" is too big. probably lost you again)

If the government (lost you again) has lost all the way to the USSC, then they must change the money.

Only when ALL of those things happen, will we have to change the money.

At which point, you say it will be too expensive.

But we're already changing the quarters 50 times.

Pennies
Nickles
Dimes
Quarters
Half-Dollars
Dollar coins
Dollar bills
$2
$5
$10
$20
$50
$100
etc.

Even if we changed ALL the money, it would STILL be FEWER changes than we are currently going through VOLUNTARILY with the quarters.

Again.

#1. What he WANTS does not matter.

#2. He has to go through the SYSTEM to get his WANTS enacted.

#3. Even if he wins ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE SYSTEM.....the impact will be less than what we're going through right now.

Is there is ANYONE other than Mr. Pathetic who has a PROBLEM understanding the situation?
New Now, for everyone who doesn't understand what "strawman" is.
This is paraphrased.

I say that what this person WANTS doesn't matter. He still has to take it through the system, which has to agree with him, before any changes are even contemplated.

Mr. Pathetic, instead of addressing my position, skips to another, more easily disproven position and introduces "Nah...doubt it...he's too afraid of the big bad wolf."

I didn't say he was afraid.

I didn't say he was not afraid.

But this is what Bill "Strawman" Pathetic will switch to.

And the reason for that is because Bill was unprepared with facts to discuss this issue.

#1. The case against the money has NOT been brought to trial.

#2. Until it IS brought to trial and ruled upon, discussions about the rulling (which hasn't happened yet) are meaningless.

#3. We're already spending MORE than what it would cost to re-do the existing money by RE-DOING the existing quarters.
New >2< Posts this time...way cool!
And I knew you wouldn't be able to get through this without starting with the insults.

You're getting predictable.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
     Federal judge: Pledge of Allegiance violates US Constitution - (bbronson) - (43)
         Yes, I recall when that phrase was added. - (Ashton) - (25)
             Dammit! - (Brandioch) - (24)
                 Well...we'll just have to.. - (bepatient) - (20)
                     Ah, once again, you missed the point. - (Brandioch) - (17)
                         Nope...you missed mine. - (bepatient) - (16)
                             Maybe I was reading that incorrectly. - (Brandioch) - (15)
                                 Wow.... - (bepatient) - (14)
                                     Let me simplify this for you. - (Brandioch) - (13)
                                         My my - (bepatient) - (12)
                                             I'll address this in two parts. - (Brandioch) - (11)
                                                 *cackle* - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                     I'll use really small words for you. - (Brandioch)
                                                     Now, for everyone who doesn't understand what "strawman" is. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                                         >2< Posts this time...way cool! - (bepatient)
                                                 More than retooling quarters - (rsf) - (5)
                                                     Ah... - (bepatient)
                                                     Depends upon the ruling. - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                                         Even better... - (bepatient)
                                                         Re: Depends upon the ruling. - (rsf) - (1)
                                                             But that's the issue. - (Brandioch)
                                                 More than retooling quarters - (rsf)
                     In Dog We Strut - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Heh... - (bepatient)
                 While you are at it ... - (bluke) - (2)
                     I guess reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (1)
                         I just think that the pundits... - (Simon_Jester)
         Senate immediately proves that dumb is cool. - (Brandioch) - (1)
             uhhh... - (jb4)
         Blatantly stolen from CNN - (Brandioch)
         Congress fulminates: stands outside and recites. - (Ashton) - (5)
             User Friendly. Get it fast. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                 I'll genuflect to that! -NT - (Ashton)
             Of course you meant "One Nation under Rah!". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                 I pledge allegiance - (Yendor) - (1)
                     Where do I sign up ;-) -NT - (bepatient)
         I love Bill Mahr's take last night - (drewk)
         Okay, this is a tangent, but I think it's applicable. - (Brandioch) - (3)
             But I thought you were an atheist? -NT - (imric) - (2)
                 I'm going for effect. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                     For Effect... - (Simon_Jester)
         On NPR now: discussion, debate, fulminations - (Ashton) - (2)
             Is that vaguely reminiscient of "separate but equal"? - (Brandioch) - (1)
                 "I plagiarize egregiousness to the flagging of the - (Ashton)

Prolly need to go back for "reeducation"...
133 ms