IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Did the AP embed a reporter with the teams cruising in unmarked vans and disappearing people?
--

Drew
New nope, there is a missing persons list in portland?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New The first round was catch-and-release. That makes it ok?
--

Drew
New so where did they "disappear" to? if it was to a jail then in front of a judge that not ok?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New No judge.
They were interrogated and threatened, then released. Some were told if they ever attended another protest, they were in big trouble.

This is a test run for the American Gestapo, to demonstrate that nothing will stop these tactics. Indefinite detainment without Miranda or outside communication will be next.

The administration's question, "Do we own enough judges now to get away with this?".

So far, it looks like the answer is, "Yes".
New so we are going to be like canada then
6 months detention without a hearing or notificaton of being held
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Are you implying that makes it OK?
--

Drew
New nope
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Then WTF *I*S* your argument? If you have one, make it -- otherwise, STFU.
Or, preferably: For once in your despicable career as a shitposter, go out and buy a big bucket of decency, so you can then type the words: "No, sorry, as usual I didn't have a point. I just like to disrupt any semblance of rational discussion that threatens to show my Trumpnazi viewpoints are shit."
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who (used to think he) Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New precedent
Homan Square revealed: how Chicago police 'disappeared' 7,000 people



From August 2004 to June 2015, nearly 6,000 of those held at the facility were black, which represents more than twice the proportion of the city’s population. But only 68 of those held were allowed access to attorneys or a public notice of their whereabouts, internal police records show.

The new disclosures, the result of an ongoing Guardian transparency lawsuit and investigation, provide the most detailed, full-scale portrait yet of the truth about Homan Square, a secretive facility that Chicago police have described as little more than a low-level narcotics crime outpost where the mayor has said police “follow all the rules”.

The police portrayals contrast sharply with those of Homan Square detainees and their lawyers, who insist that “if this could happen to someone, it could happen to anyone”. A 30-year-old man named Jose, for example, was one of the few detainees with an attorney present when he surrendered to police. He said officers at the warehouse questioned him even after his lawyer specifically told them he would not speak.

“The Fillmore and Homan boys,” Jose said, referring to police and the facility’s cross streets, “don’t play by the rules.”





Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous.
- - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
New From August 2004 to June 2015 trump wasnt president then, thats why not much concern until now
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New The protests aren't about Trump
--

Drew
New True re many--but he's assurely the gigundo-Example of 'Why-we-Fight', (some: for decades).
New No, really not
There are lots of old white men who are more vociferous in their beliefs. The problem is that the more carefully-spoken ones who wield the institutional power decided to put one of the raving loons in front of their party.
--

Drew
New ~Concur, nice catch: it's the deception-planners who deserve the most obloquy, of whatever age
These KNOW they are lying /spinning but constantly buffer the fact: I Am ..a Rat in Rat's clothing..
and no-mistake.

Could this be ingrained as a toddler? He hit me First, Mom!
We are so fucking malleable ..on the broad Way --> towards adult insouciance-for-life :-/
     not posturing or gotchas, embedded reporting inside portland cthouse and embedded outside as well - (boxley) - (21)
         They don't want a solution, they want an excuse -NT - (drook) - (20)
             which side? or both? -NT - (boxley) - (19)
                 Trying not to knee jerk and assume - (drook) - (18)
                     you have folks inside the courthouse whose "mission" such as it is - (boxley) - (17)
                         This wasn't about the feds until they started playing Gestapo - (drook) - (16)
                             from the article I posted it did not seem like they were playing gestapo -NT - (boxley) - (15)
                                 Did the AP embed a reporter with the teams cruising in unmarked vans and disappearing people? -NT - (drook) - (14)
                                     nope, there is a missing persons list in portland? -NT - (boxley) - (13)
                                         The first round was catch-and-release. That makes it ok? -NT - (drook) - (12)
                                             so where did they "disappear" to? if it was to a jail then in front of a judge that not ok? -NT - (boxley) - (11)
                                                 No judge. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                                                     so we are going to be like canada then - (boxley) - (3)
                                                         Are you implying that makes it OK? -NT - (drook) - (2)
                                                             nope -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                 Then WTF *I*S* your argument? If you have one, make it -- otherwise, STFU. - (CRConrad)
                                                 precedent - (lincoln) - (5)
                                                     From August 2004 to June 2015 trump wasnt president then, thats why not much concern until now -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                                                         The protests aren't about Trump -NT - (drook) - (3)
                                                             True re many--but he's assurely the gigundo-Example of 'Why-we-Fight', (some: for decades). -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                 No, really not - (drook) - (1)
                                                                     ~Concur, nice catch: it's the deception-planners who deserve the most obloquy, of whatever age - (Ashton)

At the tone, please leave a message. *beep*
64 ms