I wasn't proficient at snagging all the 'conditions'
Saw this en-passant, so no intro--may have been on pbs/'News: the #s shown were on-screen text.
But in context, the spot was re. 'expected Gaussian-by-age' -vs- the various pre-Maturity! Openings and the results: seen post-event(s). Thus, scoping the age-groups present at [n] of the the Daytona-Beach-grade complete obliviousness, later looking ~2-weeks +/- later: and using similar Stats-munging as previous 'new cases '#s.
(Given the status of getting-any-data from Drumpf Inc. (and the rest we know) I'd say that 2-digit 'precision' is unlikely (??) i.e. "65" without a range is bogus, thence. But the younger age-group span is broad enough, I guess.
Nothing is SImple. when jackals are daily[still[ removing Lots of data fron US-gov sites.(Part of that mutt Be; because, if Obama's name is anywhere near some piles of Docs--erase it, sayeth the unmanly-child.
[Can't believe this isn't Fiction].
But in context, the spot was re. 'expected Gaussian-by-age' -vs- the various pre-Maturity! Openings and the results: seen post-event(s). Thus, scoping the age-groups present at [n] of the the Daytona-Beach-grade complete obliviousness, later looking ~2-weeks +/- later: and using similar Stats-munging as previous 'new cases '#s.
(Given the status of getting-any-data from Drumpf Inc. (and the rest we know) I'd say that 2-digit 'precision' is unlikely (??) i.e. "65" without a range is bogus, thence. But the younger age-group span is broad enough, I guess.
Nothing is SImple. when jackals are daily[still[ removing Lots of data fron US-gov sites.(Part of that mutt Be; because, if Obama's name is anywhere near some piles of Docs--erase it, sayeth the unmanly-child.
[Can't believe this isn't Fiction].