No, they aren't 1-for-1 replacements for the same idea. In use:
He implied that all cops are racist.
I inferred that he doesn't like cops.
So you can make an inference based on an implication. But they really are so close phonetically, and so related logically, that mis-using one for the other in an off-the-cuff discussion is hardly proof of any glaring deficiency.
He implied that all cops are racist.
I inferred that he doesn't like cops.
So you can make an inference based on an implication. But they really are so close phonetically, and so related logically, that mis-using one for the other in an off-the-cuff discussion is hardly proof of any glaring deficiency.