IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Also also
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/well/eat/scientist-who-discredited-meat-guidelines-didnt-report-past-food-industry-ties.html

Apparently there were ties between the food industry and the lead researcher. And the tool that was used, GRADE, was designed for use with clinical drug trials, not health studies.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Ties with food industry.
It was mentioned that the lead researcher had some past involvement with the sugar industry, with no evidence of any involvement with the meat industry.

On the other other hand, some of the harshest critics get considerable financial support from the walnut and peanut industries, major players in the vegetable protein movement.
New Are you saying that we have to be wary of...
...Big Nuts?
New Especially in California.
Any major industry needs to be carefully watched. Any major industry will apply political pressure to get what they want, and what they want may not be good for citizens.

California produces 1/3 of the entire world's supply of Walnuts, and 82% of the entire world's supply of Almonds. Clearly, these are major industries that need to be watched.

The US produces only 6% of the world's supply of Peanuts, but that industry has certainly had it's share of scandals, especially regarding aflatoxins and salmonella. 44% of the world's peanut production is in China and 25% in India. Food industries in those countries certainly need to be watched carefully.

Trivia: Walnuts are nuts. Almonds are peach pits, and peanuts are beans. The almond flavor of almonds comes from their cyanide content.
New Boffo-while-true.. that last :-)
New Nah, no need to invoke conspiracy theories; he's just generally saying...
...they're nuts!
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who (used to think he) Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
     Improved science exonerates red meat. - (Andrew Grygus) - (10)
         Similar article in NY Times. - (a6l6e6x) - (9)
             Depends on the analysis. - (malraux) - (8)
                 Also also - (malraux) - (5)
                     Ties with food industry. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                         Are you saying that we have to be wary of... - (pwhysall) - (3)
                             Especially in California. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                 Boffo-while-true.. that last :-) -NT - (Ashton)
                             Nah, no need to invoke conspiracy theories; he's just generally saying... - (CRConrad)
                 depends on the meat as well -NT - (boxley)
                 Null hypotheses anyone? - (drook)

Note for the linguistically-impaired: That was a rhetorical question. (Second note, for the vocabulary-challenged: That means you're not supposed to answer it.)
115 ms