Re: What - no yammering over the Democratic Party Debate?
(That you, Todd?) OK, my brief yammer (having caught a re-run of the comments of the only two attempting to say something of any substance.) Which was Something! given the clown-posse antagonists dedicated to keeping governance at full-STOP ... until they're tazered out of their sinecures.
{{sigh}} Recall how everyone--watching the ascending BHO, over those few years--worried that such intelligence (say..) just couldn't ever overcome the national brain-deadness and become Prez?
Then, some-how (maybe via more distributed desperation than was realized by the naysayers?) He got in, (as we all held breath that it wasn't all just virtuoso-bloviation.) Years next before the +/-s get sorted.
So then, Clearly Bernie groks to fullness the fact of Murican 'socialism' for the rich/vulture capitalism for the masses. Hillary still postulates 'faith' that this anti-democratic oligarchy can be controlled, reformed {play Zarathustra chords} ... with no root reforms either contemplated or deemed necessary. How brain-dead shall the 2016 electorate (actually voting) prove to be?
{{sigh}} Recall how everyone--watching the ascending BHO, over those few years--worried that such intelligence (say..) just couldn't ever overcome the national brain-deadness and become Prez?
Then, some-how (maybe via more distributed desperation than was realized by the naysayers?) He got in, (as we all held breath that it wasn't all just virtuoso-bloviation.) Years next before the +/-s get sorted.
So then, Clearly Bernie groks to fullness the fact of Murican 'socialism' for the rich/vulture capitalism for the masses. Hillary still postulates 'faith' that this anti-democratic oligarchy can be controlled, reformed {play Zarathustra chords} ... with no root reforms either contemplated or deemed necessary. How brain-dead shall the 2016 electorate (actually voting) prove to be?
